From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Greg Freemyer" Subject: Re: RFC: detection of silent corruption via ATA long sector reads Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 16:05:48 -0500 Message-ID: <87f94c370901021305x7ad237ear25dcd32cbe6e7d2c@mail.gmail.com> References: <49580061.9060506@yahoo.com> <87f94c370901021226j40176872h9e5723c6da4afcbe@mail.gmail.com> <124360.23007.qm@web110612.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <124360.23007.qm@web110612.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sitsofe Wheeler Cc: Mark Lord , Redeeman , piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de, neilb@suse.de, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, IDE/ATA development list , linux-kernel List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: >> Is there a more comprehensive write-up / resource that describes the >> current status of the overall INTEGRITY support is, especially as it >> relates to ATA devices? > > > Did you check the kernel notes on kernelnewbies when the feature went in - > http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_2_6_27 ? Interesting read, but it does not really answer the questions I posed. I did look through the 2.6.27 source I have handy and the only call to blk_integrity_register() is in./drivers/scsi/sd_dif.c. That leaves me with the impression that there are not any ATA devices claiming support yet. Greg -- Greg Freemyer Litigation Triage Solutions Specialist http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregfreemyer First 99 Days Litigation White Paper - http://www.norcrossgroup.com/forms/whitepapers/99%20Days%20whitepaper.pdf The Norcross Group The Intersection of Evidence & Technology http://www.norcrossgroup.com