From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
To: Micha Sawicz <michal@sawicz.net>
Cc: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>,
Tim Bock <jtbock@daylight.com>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about raid robustness when disk fails
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:29:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87hbq9s4r2.fsf@frosties.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1264443165.30742.73.camel@test.apertos.eu> (Micha's message of "Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:12:45 +0100")
Michał Sawicz <michal@sawicz.net> writes:
> Dnia 2010-01-25, pon o godzinie 18:51 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow pisze:
>> The only values I would keep a close eye on is remapped sectors and
>> pending sectors. Anything else gives nice graphs but I always feel is
>> totaly useless. And even the pending sectors are != 0 on one drive
>> while
>> badblocks reports no errors on repeated passes. The drive just doesn't
>> seem to reduce the count when it successfully remaps a sector.
>
> I read today that Samsungs show that behavior. Maybe this is the case?
I usualy buy one or at most 2 new disks at a time so my drives are all
different makes and models. Might verry well be a samsung drive that has
that behaviour.
MfG
Goswin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-26 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-08 17:39 Question about raid robustness when disk fails Tim Bock
2010-01-22 16:32 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-01-25 16:22 ` Tim Bock
2010-01-25 17:51 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-01-25 18:12 ` Michał Sawicz
2010-01-26 7:29 ` Goswin von Brederlow [this message]
2010-01-27 0:19 ` Ryan Wagoner
2010-01-27 4:22 ` Michael Evans
2010-01-27 9:04 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-01-27 9:22 ` Asdo
2010-01-27 10:25 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-01-27 10:43 ` Asdo
2010-01-27 15:34 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-01-28 11:52 ` Michael Evans
2010-01-27 15:15 ` Tim Bock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87hbq9s4r2.fsf@frosties.localdomain \
--to=goswin-v-b@web.de \
--cc=jtbock@daylight.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal@sawicz.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox