From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
To: Jon@eHardcastle.com
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid 5 - not clean and then a failure.
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:18:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87hbvu9626.fsf@frosties.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15771.7292.qm@web51312.mail.re2.yahoo.com> (Jon Hardcastle's message of "Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:54:49 -0700 (PDT)")
Jon Hardcastle <jd_hardcastle@yahoo.com> writes:
> Guys,
>
> I have been having some problems with my arrays that I think i have nailed down to a pci controller (well I say that - it is always the drives connected to *a* controller but I have tried 2!) anyway the latest saga is i was trying some new kernel options last night - which didn't work.
>
> But when i booted up again this morning it said one of the drives was in an inconsistent state (not sure of the *exact* error message). I then kicked off an add of the drive and it started syncing. It got about 5% in and then the second drive in on that controller complained and the array failed.
>
> Is there any hope for my data? If i get a good controller in there will the resync continue? can I try and tell it to assume the drives are good (which they ought to be)?
>
> Please help!
The inconsistency is probably just a block here or there and I'm
assuming none of your drives actualy failed. So 99.9999% of your data
should be there. Just rebooting might actualy just get your raid back
(to syncing). If not then you have to force reassembly from the drives
with the newest serials. That will give you some data corruption,
whatever was writing when the controler gave errors. Worst case you
have to recreate the raid with --assume-clean.
I recommend adding a bitmap to the raid. That way a wrongfully failed
drive can be resynced in a matter of minutes instead of hours or
days. Makes it way less likely another error occurs during resync.
MfG
Goswin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-26 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-25 7:54 Raid 5 - not clean and then a failure Jon Hardcastle
2009-08-25 8:16 ` Robin Hill
2009-08-25 8:40 ` Jon Hardcastle
2009-08-25 9:34 ` Robin Hill
2009-08-25 13:47 ` John Robinson
2009-08-25 14:11 ` Jon Hardcastle
2009-08-26 11:02 ` Jon Hardcastle
2009-08-26 11:18 ` Goswin von Brederlow [this message]
2009-08-26 11:29 ` Jon Hardcastle
2009-08-26 12:47 ` John Robinson
2009-08-26 20:34 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-08-26 14:14 ` Ryan Wagoner
2009-08-26 14:19 ` Jon Hardcastle
2009-08-26 14:50 ` Robin Hill
2009-08-26 14:33 ` Robin Hill
2009-08-26 20:35 ` Goswin von Brederlow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87hbvu9626.fsf@frosties.localdomain \
--to=goswin-v-b@web.de \
--cc=Jon@eHardcastle.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).