From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] md: raid1/raid10: initialize bvec table via bio_add_page()
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 13:09:28 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87inix2ftj.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170713013710.GC670@ming.t460p>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5861 bytes --]
On Thu, Jul 13 2017, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:01:33AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 12 2017, Ming Lei wrote:
>>
>> > We will support multipage bvec soon, so initialize bvec
>> > table using the standardy way instead of writing the
>> > talbe directly. Otherwise it won't work any more once
>> > multipage bvec is enabled.
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/md/md.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> > drivers/md/md.h | 3 +++
>> > drivers/md/raid1.c | 16 ++--------------
>> > drivers/md/raid10.c | 4 ++--
>> > 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
>> > index 8cdca0296749..cc8dcd928dde 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/md/md.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
>> > @@ -9130,6 +9130,27 @@ void md_reload_sb(struct mddev *mddev, int nr)
>> > }
>> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(md_reload_sb);
>> >
>> > +/* generally called after bio_reset() for reseting bvec */
>> > +void md_bio_reset_resync_pages(struct bio *bio, struct resync_pages *rp,
>> > + int size)
>> > +{
>> > + int idx = 0;
>> > +
>> > + /* initialize bvec table again */
>> > + do {
>> > + struct page *page = resync_fetch_page(rp, idx);
>> > + int len = min_t(int, size, PAGE_SIZE);
>> > +
>> > + /*
>> > + * won't fail because the vec table is big
>> > + * enough to hold all these pages
>> > + */
>> > + bio_add_page(bio, page, len, 0);
>> > + size -= len;
>> > + } while (idx++ < RESYNC_PAGES && size > 0);
>> > +}
>> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(md_bio_reset_resync_pages);
>>
>> I really don't think this is a good idea.
>> This code is specific to raid1/raid10. It is not generic md code. So
>> it doesn't belong here.
>
> We already added 'struct resync_pages' in drivers/md/md.h, so I think
> it is reasonable to add this function into drivers/md/md.c
Alternative perspective: it was unreasonable to add "resync_pages" to
md.h.
>
>>
>> If you want to remove code duplication, then work on moving all raid1
>> functionality into raid10.c, then discard raid1.c
>
> This patch is for avoiding new code duplication, not for removing current
> duplication.
>
>>
>> Or at the very least, have a separate "raid1-10.c" file for the common
>> code.
>
> You suggested it last time, but looks too overkill to be taken. But if
> someone wants to refactor raid1 and raid10, I think it can be a good start,
> but still not belong to this patch.
You are trying to create common code for raid1 and raid10. This does
not belong in md.c.
If you really want to have a single copy of common code, then it exactly
is the role of this patch to create a place to put it.
I'm not saying you should put all common code in raid1-10.c. Just the
function that you have identified.
NeilBrown
>
> Thanks,
> Ming
>
>>
>> NeilBrown
>>
>> > +
>> > #ifndef MODULE
>> >
>> > /*
>> > diff --git a/drivers/md/md.h b/drivers/md/md.h
>> > index 2c780aa8d07f..efb32ce7a2f1 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/md/md.h
>> > +++ b/drivers/md/md.h
>> > @@ -782,4 +782,7 @@ static inline struct page *resync_fetch_page(struct resync_pages *rp,
>> > return NULL;
>> > return rp->pages[idx];
>> > }
>> > +
>> > +void md_bio_reset_resync_pages(struct bio *bio, struct resync_pages *rp,
>> > + int size);
>> > #endif /* _MD_MD_H */
>> > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
>> > index 7901ddc3362f..5dc3fda2fdf7 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
>> > @@ -2085,10 +2085,7 @@ static void process_checks(struct r1bio *r1_bio)
>> > /* Fix variable parts of all bios */
>> > vcnt = (r1_bio->sectors + PAGE_SIZE / 512 - 1) >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 9);
>> > for (i = 0; i < conf->raid_disks * 2; i++) {
>> > - int j;
>> > - int size;
>> > blk_status_t status;
>> > - struct bio_vec *bi;
>> > struct bio *b = r1_bio->bios[i];
>> > struct resync_pages *rp = get_resync_pages(b);
>> > if (b->bi_end_io != end_sync_read)
>> > @@ -2097,8 +2094,6 @@ static void process_checks(struct r1bio *r1_bio)
>> > status = b->bi_status;
>> > bio_reset(b);
>> > b->bi_status = status;
>> > - b->bi_vcnt = vcnt;
>> > - b->bi_iter.bi_size = r1_bio->sectors << 9;
>> > b->bi_iter.bi_sector = r1_bio->sector +
>> > conf->mirrors[i].rdev->data_offset;
>> > b->bi_bdev = conf->mirrors[i].rdev->bdev;
>> > @@ -2106,15 +2101,8 @@ static void process_checks(struct r1bio *r1_bio)
>> > rp->raid_bio = r1_bio;
>> > b->bi_private = rp;
>> >
>> > - size = b->bi_iter.bi_size;
>> > - bio_for_each_segment_all(bi, b, j) {
>> > - bi->bv_offset = 0;
>> > - if (size > PAGE_SIZE)
>> > - bi->bv_len = PAGE_SIZE;
>> > - else
>> > - bi->bv_len = size;
>> > - size -= PAGE_SIZE;
>> > - }
>> > + /* initialize bvec table again */
>> > + md_bio_reset_resync_pages(b, rp, r1_bio->sectors << 9);
>> > }
>> > for (primary = 0; primary < conf->raid_disks * 2; primary++)
>> > if (r1_bio->bios[primary]->bi_end_io == end_sync_read &&
>> > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
>> > index e594ca610f27..cb8e803cd1c2 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
>> > @@ -2086,8 +2086,8 @@ static void sync_request_write(struct mddev *mddev, struct r10bio *r10_bio)
>> > rp = get_resync_pages(tbio);
>> > bio_reset(tbio);
>> >
>> > - tbio->bi_vcnt = vcnt;
>> > - tbio->bi_iter.bi_size = fbio->bi_iter.bi_size;
>> > + md_bio_reset_resync_pages(tbio, rp, fbio->bi_iter.bi_size);
>> > +
>> > rp->raid_bio = r10_bio;
>> > tbio->bi_private = rp;
>> > tbio->bi_iter.bi_sector = r10_bio->devs[i].addr;
>> > --
>> > 2.9.4
>
>
>
> --
> Ming
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-13 3:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-12 8:29 [PATCH 2/2] md: raid1/raid10: initialize bvec table via bio_add_page() Ming Lei
2017-07-12 9:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-07-13 1:40 ` Ming Lei
2017-07-13 0:01 ` NeilBrown
2017-07-13 1:37 ` Ming Lei
2017-07-13 3:09 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2017-07-13 9:20 ` Ming Lei
2017-07-13 16:39 ` Shaohua Li
2017-07-13 22:08 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87inix2ftj.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).