From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kernel-team@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] raid5-cache: avoid write failure for journal hotadd
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 12:03:13 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87io37y0xa.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1eb31e4a94d3bb5d723164cdcb30a76d1feac7ef.1452028077.git.shli@fb.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3970 bytes --]
On Wed, Jan 06 2016, Shaohua Li wrote:
> r5l_log_disk_error() will make write request fail if there is no log,
> but MD_HAS_JOURNAL is set. When we hotadd journal, MD_HAS_JOURNAL is set
> but the r5l_log isn't fully initialized yet. Adding a new flag to
> indicate the situation and let r5l_log_disk_error() handle the
> situation.
>
> Based on Song Liu's original patch
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/md.c | 10 +++++++++-
> drivers/md/md.h | 2 ++
> drivers/md/raid5-cache.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> index c0c3e6d..9f1d609 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@ -6899,8 +6899,16 @@ static int md_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
> else if (!(info.state & (1<<MD_DISK_SYNC)))
> /* Need to clear read-only for this */
> break;
> - else
> + else {
> + if ((info.state & (1<<MD_DISK_JOURNAL)) &&
> + !test_bit(MD_HAS_JOURNAL, &mddev->flags))
> + set_bit(MD_JOURNAL_NOT_INITIALIZED,
> + &mddev->flags);
> err = add_new_disk(mddev, &info);
> + if (err)
> + clear_bit(MD_JOURNAL_NOT_INITIALIZED,
> + &mddev->flags);
> + }
> goto unlock;
> }
> break;
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.h b/drivers/md/md.h
> index e16a17c..d18e0d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.h
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.h
> @@ -238,6 +238,8 @@ struct mddev {
> #define MD_RELOAD_SB 7 /* Reload the superblock because another node
> * updated it.
> */
> +#define MD_JOURNAL_NOT_INITIALIZED 8 /* hot add a journal, and journal isn't
> + * ready to use yet */
>
> int suspended;
> atomic_t active_io;
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
> index 31e0fad..5a0f680 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
> @@ -859,9 +859,17 @@ bool r5l_log_disk_error(struct r5conf *conf)
> rcu_read_lock();
> log = rcu_dereference(conf->log);
>
> - if (!log)
> - ret = test_bit(MD_HAS_JOURNAL, &conf->mddev->flags);
> - else
> + if (!log) {
> + ret = test_bit(MD_HAS_JOURNAL, &conf->mddev->flags) &&
> + !test_bit(MD_JOURNAL_NOT_INITIALIZED, &conf->mddev->flags);
> + smp_mb__after_atomic();
> + /*
> + * r5l_init_log sets ->log first and then clear INITIALIZED, we
> + * check in reverse order to avoid race condition.
> + */
> + log = rcu_dereference(conf->log);
> + }
> + if (log)
> ret = test_bit(Faulty, &log->rdev->flags);
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return ret;
> @@ -1242,6 +1250,8 @@ int r5l_init_log(struct r5conf *conf, struct md_rdev *rdev)
> goto error;
>
> rcu_assign_pointer(conf->log, log);
> + smp_mb__before_atomic();
> + clear_bit(MD_JOURNAL_NOT_INITIALIZED, &conf->mddev->flags);
> return 0;
>
> error:
> --
> 2.4.6
I don't feel at all comfortable about this.
Having one flag saying "there is a journal" and another saying
"actually, no there isn't" just isn't very clean.
So I wondered "why is MD_HAS_JOURNAL set so early", and discovered it
being set in super_1_validate() - but in the wrong place.
super_1_validate should only make changes the mddev when
mddev->raid_disks is zero. In that case all the array details are
initialised from the metadata.
Other calls to super_1_validate should validate that the new metadata
matches mddev, and may set some details in 'rdev'.
So:
if (mddev->recovery_cp == MaxSector)
set_bit(MD_JOURNAL_CLEAN, &mddev->flags);
and
if (le32_to_cpu(sb->feature_map) & MD_FEATURE_JOURNAL)
set_bit(MD_HAS_JOURNAL, &mddev->flags);
don't fit the pattern.
These should be moved to the "mddev->raid_disks == 0" section of
super_1_validate.
Then when a journal is hot-added, the MD_HAS_JOURNAL flag should be set
once the journal is actually active.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-06 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-05 21:26 [PATCH 0/4]raid5-cache: fix journal hotadd Shaohua Li
2016-01-05 21:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] raid5-cache: use rcu api to access r5conf->log Shaohua Li
2016-01-06 1:04 ` NeilBrown
2016-01-05 21:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] raid5-cache: avoid write failure for journal hotadd Shaohua Li
2016-01-06 1:03 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2016-01-05 21:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] raid5-cache: handle flush request " Shaohua Li
2016-01-06 1:12 ` NeilBrown
2016-01-06 1:47 ` Shaohua Li
2016-01-06 2:07 ` NeilBrown
2016-01-05 21:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] raid5-cache: handle batch stripe " Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87io37y0xa.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shli@fb.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).