From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
Cc: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>, linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
yizhan@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Bad raid0 bio too large problem
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 12:25:45 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k2rhyiqe.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <wrfjoagucvyq.fsf@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1727 bytes --]
Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com> writes:
> Hi Neil,
>
> I think we have some bad side effects with this patch:
>
> commit 199dc6ed5179251fa6158a461499c24bdd99c836
> Author: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
> Date: Mon Aug 3 13:11:47 2015 +1000
>
> md/raid0: update queue parameter in a safer location.
>
> When a (e.g.) RAID5 array is reshaped to RAID0, the updating
> of queue parameters (e.g. max number of sectors per bio) is
> done in the wrong place.
> It should be part of ->run, but it is actually part of ->takeover.
> This means it happens before level_store() calls:
>
> blk_set_stacking_limits(&mddev->queue->limits);
>
> Running the '03r0assem' test suite fills my kernel log with output like
> below. Yi Zhang also had issues where writes failed too.
>
> robably something we need to resolve for 4.2-final or revert the
> offending patch.
>
> Cheers,
> Jes
>
> md: bind<loop0>
> md: bind<loop1>
> md: bind<loop2>
> md/raid0:md2: md_size is 116736 sectors.
> md: RAID0 configuration for md2 - 1 zone
> md: zone0=[loop0/loop1/loop2]
> zone-offset= 0KB, device-offset= 0KB, size= 58368KB
>
> md2: detected capacity change from 0 to 59768832
> bio too big device loop0 (296 > 255)
> bio too big device loop0 (272 > 255)
1/ Why do you blame that particular patch?
2/ Where is that error message coming from? I cannot find "bio too big"
in the kernel (except in a comment).
Commit: 54efd50bfd87 ("block: make generic_make_request handle arbitrarily sized bios")
removed the only instance of the error message that I know of.
Which kernel exactly are you testing?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-23 2:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-22 15:30 Bad raid0 bio too large problem Jes Sorensen
2015-09-22 16:07 ` Jes Sorensen
2015-09-23 2:25 ` Neil Brown [this message]
2015-09-23 11:18 ` Jes Sorensen
2015-09-23 11:20 ` Jes Sorensen
2015-09-23 11:42 ` Jes Sorensen
2015-09-24 2:53 ` Neil Brown
2015-09-24 8:48 ` Xiao Ni
2015-09-24 12:59 ` Jes Sorensen
2015-09-25 4:23 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k2rhyiqe.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xni@redhat.com \
--cc=yizhan@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).