linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
Cc: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>, linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
	yizhan@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Bad raid0 bio too large problem
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 12:25:45 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k2rhyiqe.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <wrfjoagucvyq.fsf@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1727 bytes --]

Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com> writes:

> Hi Neil,
>
> I think we have some bad side effects with this patch:
>
> commit 199dc6ed5179251fa6158a461499c24bdd99c836
> Author: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
> Date:   Mon Aug 3 13:11:47 2015 +1000
>
>     md/raid0: update queue parameter in a safer location.
>     
>     When a (e.g.) RAID5 array is reshaped to RAID0, the updating
>     of queue parameters (e.g. max number of sectors per bio) is
>     done in the wrong place.
>     It should be part of ->run, but it is actually part of ->takeover.
>     This means it happens before level_store() calls:
>     
>         blk_set_stacking_limits(&mddev->queue->limits);
>     
> Running the '03r0assem' test suite fills my kernel log with output like
> below. Yi Zhang also had issues where writes failed too.
>
> robably something we need to resolve for 4.2-final or revert the
> offending patch.
>
> Cheers,
> Jes
>
> md: bind<loop0>
> md: bind<loop1>
> md: bind<loop2>
> md/raid0:md2: md_size is 116736 sectors.
> md: RAID0 configuration for md2 - 1 zone
> md: zone0=[loop0/loop1/loop2]
>       zone-offset=         0KB, device-offset=         0KB, size=     58368KB
>
> md2: detected capacity change from 0 to 59768832
> bio too big device loop0 (296 > 255)
> bio too big device loop0 (272 > 255)

1/ Why do you blame that particular patch?

2/ Where is that error message coming from?  I cannot find "bio too big"
  in the kernel (except in a comment).
  Commit: 54efd50bfd87 ("block: make generic_make_request handle arbitrarily sized bios")
  removed the only instance of the error message that I know of.

Which kernel exactly are you testing?

Thanks,
NeilBrown

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-09-23  2:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-22 15:30 Bad raid0 bio too large problem Jes Sorensen
2015-09-22 16:07 ` Jes Sorensen
2015-09-23  2:25 ` Neil Brown [this message]
2015-09-23 11:18   ` Jes Sorensen
2015-09-23 11:20     ` Jes Sorensen
2015-09-23 11:42       ` Jes Sorensen
2015-09-24  2:53     ` Neil Brown
2015-09-24  8:48       ` Xiao Ni
2015-09-24 12:59       ` Jes Sorensen
2015-09-25  4:23         ` Neil Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87k2rhyiqe.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xni@redhat.com \
    --cc=yizhan@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).