linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [md PATCH 09/36] md: make it easier to wait for bad blocks to be acknowledged.
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 01:04:15 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87livldo5c.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110721025848.8422.68600.stgit@notabene.brown> (NeilBrown's message of "Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:58:48 +1000")

NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> writes:

> It is only safe to choose not to write to a bad block if that bad
> block is safely recorded in metadata - i.e. if it has been
> 'acknowledged'.
>
> If it hasn't we need to wait for the acknowledgement.
>
> We support that using rdev->blocked wait and
> md_wait_for_blocked_rdev by introducing a new device flag
> 'BlockedBadBlock'.
>
> This flag is only advisory.
> It is cleared whenever we acknowledge a bad block, so that a waiter
> can re-check the particular bad blocks that it is interested it.
>
> It should be set by a caller when they find they need to wait.
> This (set after test) is inherently racy, but as
> md_wait_for_blocked_rdev already has a timeout, losing the race will
> have minimal impact.
>
> When we clear "Blocked" was also clear "BlockedBadBlocks" incase it
> was set incorrectly (see above race).
>
> We also modify the way we manage 'Blocked' to fit better with the new
> handling of 'BlockedBadBlocks' and to make it consistent between
> externally managed and internally managed metadata.   This requires
> that each raidXd loop checks if the metadata needs to be written and
> triggers a write (md_check_recovery) if needed.  Otherwise a queued
> write request might cause raidXd to wait for the metadata to write,
> and only that thread can write it.
>
> Before writing metadata, we set FaultRecorded for all devices that
> are Faulty, then after writing the metadata we clear Blocked for any
> device for which the Fault was certainly Recorded.
>
> The 'faulty' device flag now appears in sysfs if the device is faulty
> *or* it has unacknowledged bad blocks.  So user-space which does not
> understand bad blocks can continue to function correctly.
> User space which does, should not assume a device is faulty until it
> sees the 'faulty' flag, and then sees the list of unacknowledged bad
> blocks is empty.
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Probably you also need this patch:

From 76320c4fdaed91f26a083a9337bb5a5503300e0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:59:26 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] md: update documentation for md/rdev/state sysfs interface

Previous patches in the bad block series extended behavior of
rdev's 'state' interface but lacked documentation update.
Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/md.txt |   14 +++++++++-----
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/md.txt b/Documentation/md.txt
index 923a6bddce7c..fc94770f44ab 100644
--- a/Documentation/md.txt
+++ b/Documentation/md.txt
@@ -360,18 +360,20 @@ Each directory contains:
         A file recording the current state of the device in the array
 	which can be a comma separated list of
 	      faulty   - device has been kicked from active use due to
-                         a detected fault
+                         a detected fault or it has unacknowledged bad
+                         blocks
 	      in_sync  - device is a fully in-sync member of the array
 	      writemostly - device will only be subject to read
 		         requests if there are no other options.
 			 This applies only to raid1 arrays.
-	      blocked  - device has failed, metadata is "external",
-	                 and the failure hasn't been acknowledged yet.
+	      blocked  - device has failed, and the failure hasn't been
+			 acknowledged yet by the metadata handler.
 			 Writes that would write to this device if
 			 it were not faulty are blocked.
 	      spare    - device is working, but not a full member.
 			 This includes spares that are in the process
 			 of being recovered to
+	      write_error - device has ever seen a write error.
 	This list may grow in future.
 	This can be written to.
 	Writing "faulty"  simulates a failure on the device.
@@ -379,9 +381,11 @@ Each directory contains:
 	Writing "writemostly" sets the writemostly flag.
 	Writing "-writemostly" clears the writemostly flag.
 	Writing "blocked" sets the "blocked" flag.
-	Writing "-blocked" clears the "blocked" flag and allows writes
-		to complete.
+	Writing "-blocked" clears the "blocked" flags and allows writes
+		to complete and possibly simulates an error.
 	Writing "in_sync" sets the in_sync flag.
+	Writing "write_error" sets writeerrorseen flag.
+	Writing "-write_error" clears writeerrorseen flag.
 
 	This file responds to select/poll. Any change to 'faulty'
 	or 'blocked' causes an event.
-- 
1.7.6


  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-26 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-21  2:58 [md PATCH 00/36] md patches for 3.1 - part 2: bad block logs NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 02/36] md/bad-block-log: add sysfs interface for accessing bad-block-log NeilBrown
2011-07-22 15:43   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  2:29     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-26  5:17       ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  8:48   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 15:03     ` [PATCH v2] md: add documentation for bad block log Namhyung Kim
2011-07-27  1:05     ` [md PATCH 02/36] md/bad-block-log: add sysfs interface for accessing bad-block-log NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 01/36] md: beginnings of bad block management NeilBrown
2011-07-22 15:03   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  2:26     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-26  5:17       ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-22 16:52   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  3:20     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 04/36] md: load/store badblock list from v1.x metadata NeilBrown
2011-07-22 16:34   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 03/36] md: don't allow arrays to contain devices with bad blocks NeilBrown
2011-07-22 15:47   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 05/36] md: Disable bad blocks and v0.90 metadata NeilBrown
2011-07-22 17:02   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 07/36] md/raid1: avoid reading known bad blocks during resync NeilBrown
2011-07-26 14:25   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 14/36] md/raid1: record badblocks found during resync etc NeilBrown
2011-07-27 15:39   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 08/36] md: add 'write_error' flag to component devices NeilBrown
2011-07-26 15:22   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 13/36] md/raid1: Handle write errors by updating badblock log NeilBrown
2011-07-27 15:28   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 06/36] md/raid1: avoid reading from known bad blocks NeilBrown
2011-07-26 14:06   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 11/36] md/raid1: clear bad-block record when write succeeds NeilBrown
2011-07-27  5:05   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 09/36] md: make it easier to wait for bad blocks to be acknowledged NeilBrown
2011-07-26 16:04   ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2011-07-27  1:18     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 12/36] md/raid1: store behind-write pages in bi_vecs NeilBrown
2011-07-27 15:16   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 10/36] md/raid1: avoid writing to known-bad blocks on known-bad drives NeilBrown
2011-07-27  4:09   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-27  4:19     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 23/36] md/raid10: Split handle_read_error out from raid10d NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 19/36] md/raid5: write errors should be recorded as bad blocks if possible NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 24/36] md/raid10: avoid reading from known bad blocks - part 1 NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 16/36] md/raid1: factor several functions out or raid1d() NeilBrown
2011-07-27 15:55   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-28  1:39     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 17/36] md/raid5: avoid reading from known bad blocks NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 15/36] md/raid1: improve handling of read failure during recovery NeilBrown
2011-07-27 15:45   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 21/36] md/raid5: Clear bad blocks on successful write NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 20/36] md/raid5. Don't write to known bad block on doubtful devices NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 22/36] md/raid10: simplify/reindent some loops NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 18/36] md/raid5: use bad-block log to improve handling of uncorrectable read errors NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 27/36] md/raid10: avoid reading known bad blocks during resync/recovery NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 29/36] md/raid10: avoid writing to known bad blocks on known bad drives NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 33/36] md/raid10: record bad blocks due to write errors during resync/recovery NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 30/36] md/raid10: clear bad-block record when write succeeds NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 28/36] md/raid10 record bad blocks as needed during recovery NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 34/36] md/raid10: simplify read error handling " NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 25/36] md/raid10: avoid reading from known bad blocks - part 2 NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 31/36] md/raid10: Handle write errors by updating badblock log NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 32/36] md/raid10: attempt to fix read errors during resync/check NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 26/36] md/raid10 - avoid reading from known bad blocks - part 3 NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 36/36] md/raid10: handle further errors during fix_read_error better NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 35/36] md/raid10: Handle read errors during recovery better NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87livldo5c.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=namhyung@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).