From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
To: "Majed B." <majedb@gmail.com>
Cc: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>,
Linux Raid Study <linuxraid.study@gmail.com>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: LVM and Raid5
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:34:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ljk8rylu.fsf@frosties.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <70ed7c3e0909160320j68c792d2g8ba01ac3c34eaae5@mail.gmail.com> (Majed B.'s message of "Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:20:40 +0300")
"Majed B." <majedb@gmail.com> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I'm the one who ran those tests with LVM vs. RAID5 and I think I have
> faced speed difference because I have disks of varying speeds
> (different models and vendors), and I believe that LVM gets crippled
> down to the speed of the slowest disk.
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de> wrote:
>> Linux Raid Study <linuxraid.study@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Hello:
>>>
>>> Has someone experimented with LVM and Raid5 together (on say, 2.6.27)?
>>> Is there any performance drop if LVM/Raid5 are combined vs Raid5 alone?
>>>
>>> Thanks for your inputs!
>>
>> Has always worked perfectly for me and i can't say I noticed any
>> performance change.
>>
>> MfG
>> Â Â Â Â Goswin
But the question was raid5 vs lvm+raid5. The raid5 gets cripled down
to the slowest disk and speeds up due to striping. The LVM should not
have any noticeable effect on top of that.
MfG
Goswin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-21 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-16 8:22 LVM and Raid5 Linux Raid Study
2009-09-16 9:42 ` Jon Hardcastle
2009-09-16 10:09 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-09-16 10:20 ` Majed B.
2009-09-16 10:33 ` Jon Hardcastle
2009-09-16 11:00 ` Majed B.
2009-09-16 13:15 ` Chris Webb
2009-09-21 17:34 ` Goswin von Brederlow [this message]
2009-09-17 12:37 ` Michal Soltys
2009-09-21 14:33 ` Mike Snitzer
2009-09-21 16:30 ` Jon Hardcastle
2009-09-21 17:26 ` Mike Snitzer
2009-09-21 17:38 ` Linux Raid Study
2009-09-21 19:14 ` Majed B.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ljk8rylu.fsf@frosties.localdomain \
--to=goswin-v-b@web.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxraid.study@gmail.com \
--cc=majedb@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).