From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Asynchronous raid6 acceleration (part 1 of 2) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:43:39 +0100 Message-ID: <87ljr21jo4.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> References: <20090318191248.20375.40560.stgit@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090318191248.20375.40560.stgit@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com> (Dan Williams's message of "Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:20:16 -0700") Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dan Williams Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, neilb@suse.de, maciej.sosnowski@intel.com List-Id: linux-raid.ids Dan Williams writes: > This series constitutes the pieces of the raid6 acceleration work that are > aimed at the next merge window. It implements: > 1/ An api for asynchronous raid6 parity generation and recovery routines Could you please comment a bit how well the default load balancing works. If I write a single stream from a single CPU will it use multiple CPU cores in the system to do the RAID6 work? Thanks, -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.