linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/14] md: raid1: don't use bio's vec table to manage resync pages
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 09:09:08 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mv8d5ht7.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170316161235.27110-6-tom.leiming@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3988 bytes --]

On Fri, Mar 17 2017, Ming Lei wrote:

> Now we allocate one page array for managing resync pages, instead
> of using bio's vec table to do that, and the old way is very hacky
> and won't work any more if multipage bvec is enabled.
>
> The introduced cost is that we need to allocate (128 + 16) * raid_disks
> bytes per r1_bio, and it is fine because the inflight r1_bio for
> resync shouldn't be much, as pointed by Shaohua.
>
> Also the bio_reset() in raid1_sync_request() is removed because
> all bios are freshly new now and not necessary to reset any more.
>
> This patch can be thought as a cleanup too
>
> Suggested-by: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/md/raid1.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> index e30d89690109..0e64beb60e4d 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> @@ -80,6 +80,24 @@ static void lower_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr);
>  #define raid1_log(md, fmt, args...)				\
>  	do { if ((md)->queue) blk_add_trace_msg((md)->queue, "raid1 " fmt, ##args); } while (0)
>  
> +/*
> + * 'strct resync_pages' stores actual pages used for doing the resync
> + *  IO, and it is per-bio, so make .bi_private points to it.
> + */
> +static inline struct resync_pages *get_resync_pages(struct bio *bio)
> +{
> +	return bio->bi_private;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * for resync bio, r1bio pointer can be retrieved from the per-bio
> + * 'struct resync_pages'.
> + */
> +static inline struct r1bio *get_resync_r1bio(struct bio *bio)
> +{
> +	return get_resync_pages(bio)->raid_bio;
> +}
> +
>  static void * r1bio_pool_alloc(gfp_t gfp_flags, void *data)
>  {
>  	struct pool_info *pi = data;
> @@ -107,12 +125,18 @@ static void * r1buf_pool_alloc(gfp_t gfp_flags, void *data)
>  	struct r1bio *r1_bio;
>  	struct bio *bio;
>  	int need_pages;
> -	int i, j;
> +	int j;
> +	struct resync_pages *rps;
>  
>  	r1_bio = r1bio_pool_alloc(gfp_flags, pi);
>  	if (!r1_bio)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> +	rps = kmalloc(sizeof(struct resync_pages) * pi->raid_disks,
> +		      gfp_flags);
> +	if (!rps)
> +		goto out_free_r1bio;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Allocate bios : 1 for reading, n-1 for writing
>  	 */
> @@ -132,22 +156,22 @@ static void * r1buf_pool_alloc(gfp_t gfp_flags, void *data)
>  		need_pages = pi->raid_disks;
>  	else
>  		need_pages = 1;
> -	for (j = 0; j < need_pages; j++) {
> +	for (j = 0; j < pi->raid_disks; j++) {
> +		struct resync_pages *rp = &rps[j];
> +
>  		bio = r1_bio->bios[j];
> -		bio->bi_vcnt = RESYNC_PAGES;
> -
> -		if (bio_alloc_pages(bio, gfp_flags))
> -			goto out_free_pages;
> -	}
> -	/* If not user-requests, copy the page pointers to all bios */
> -	if (!test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_REQUESTED, &pi->mddev->recovery)) {
> -		for (i=0; i<RESYNC_PAGES ; i++)
> -			for (j=1; j<pi->raid_disks; j++) {
> -				struct page *page =
> -					r1_bio->bios[0]->bi_io_vec[i].bv_page;
> -				get_page(page);
> -				r1_bio->bios[j]->bi_io_vec[i].bv_page = page;
> -			}
> +
> +		if (j < need_pages) {
> +			if (resync_alloc_pages(rp, gfp_flags))
> +				goto out_free_pages;
> +		} else {
> +			memcpy(rp, &rps[0], sizeof(*rp));
> +			resync_get_all_pages(rp);
> +		}
> +
> +		rp->idx = 0;

This is the only place the ->idx is initialized, in r1buf_pool_alloc().
The mempool alloc function is suppose to allocate memory, not initialize
it.

If the mempool_alloc() call cannot allocate memory it will use memory
from the pool.  If this memory has already been used, then it will no
longer have the initialized value.

In short: you need to initialise memory *after* calling
mempool_alloc(), unless you ensure it is reset to the init values before
calling mempool_free().

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196307

NeilBrown

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-09 23:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-16 16:12 [PATCH v3 00/14] md: cleanup on direct access to bvec table Ming Lei
2017-03-16 16:12 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] md: raid1/raid10: don't handle failure of bio_add_page() Ming Lei
2017-03-27  9:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-16 16:12 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] md: move two macros into md.h Ming Lei
2017-03-24  5:57   ` NeilBrown
2017-03-24  6:30     ` Ming Lei
2017-03-24 16:53     ` Shaohua Li
2017-03-27  9:15       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-27  9:52         ` NeilBrown
2017-03-16 16:12 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] md: prepare for managing resync I/O pages in clean way Ming Lei
2017-03-24  6:00   ` NeilBrown
2017-03-16 16:12 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] md: raid1: simplify r1buf_pool_free() Ming Lei
2017-03-16 16:12 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] md: raid1: don't use bio's vec table to manage resync pages Ming Lei
2017-07-09 23:09   ` NeilBrown [this message]
2017-07-10  3:35     ` Ming Lei
2017-07-10  4:13       ` Ming Lei
2017-07-10  4:38         ` NeilBrown
2017-07-10  7:25           ` Ming Lei
2017-07-10 19:05             ` Shaohua Li
2017-07-10 22:54               ` Ming Lei
2017-07-10 23:14               ` NeilBrown
2017-07-12  1:40                 ` Ming Lei
2017-07-12 16:30                   ` Shaohua Li
2017-07-13  1:22                     ` Ming Lei
2017-03-16 16:12 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] md: raid1: retrieve page from pre-allocated resync page array Ming Lei
2017-03-16 16:12 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] md: raid1: use bio helper in process_checks() Ming Lei
2017-03-16 16:12 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] block: introduce bio_copy_data_partial Ming Lei
2017-03-24  5:34   ` Shaohua Li
2017-03-24 16:41   ` Jens Axboe
2017-03-16 16:12 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] md: raid1: move 'offset' out of loop Ming Lei
2017-03-16 16:12 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] md: raid1: improve write behind Ming Lei
2017-03-16 16:12 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] md: raid10: refactor code of read reshape's .bi_end_io Ming Lei
2017-03-16 16:12 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] md: raid10: don't use bio's vec table to manage resync pages Ming Lei
2017-03-16 16:12 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] md: raid10: retrieve page from preallocated resync page array Ming Lei
2017-03-16 16:12 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] md: raid10: avoid direct access to bvec table in handle_reshape_read_error Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87mv8d5ht7.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
    --to=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).