From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Neil Brown Subject: RE: Scalability of MD raid 1 mirror devices Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 13:29:12 +1100 Message-ID: <87mvvjwnpj.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> References: <98ad0e44-1ac1-4451-a3d3-0a48f3a1d9e7@default> <9b3ee99a-b29d-4e3f-8fba-a8346c3196ea@default> <87vba7vcqg.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87vba7vcqg.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ankur Bose , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Cc: Suresh Babu Kandukuru List-Id: linux-raid.ids Neil Brown writes: >> So if the minor number is more than 511, the =E2=80=9Cfd=E2=80=9D is= assigned to -1, >> if it is in the range of 0 to 511 It is working fine. > > Hmmm... you are right. > Probably due to this: > > blk_register_region(MKDEV(MD_MAJOR, 0), 512, THIS_MODULE, > md_probe, NULL, NULL); > > Try changing the "512" to "1< /sys/module/md_mod/parameters/new_array NeilBrown -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html