From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
To: Alberto Bertogli <albertito@blitiri.com.ar>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, agk@redhat.com, neilb@suse.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] dm-csum: A new device mapper target that checks data integrity
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 14:22:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87my91qsn4.fsf@frosties.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090521161317.GU1376@blitiri.com.ar> (Alberto Bertogli's message of "Thu, 21 May 2009 13:13:17 -0300")
Alberto Bertogli <albertito@blitiri.com.ar> writes:
> Hi!
>
> I'm writing this device mapper target that stores checksums on writes and
> verifies them on reads.
>
> It's not widely tested, but you can run mke2fs on it and do basic file
> operations. The to-do list is still large, and most of it can be found within
> the code.
>
> To test it, you will need to format the device using the (very rough) attached
> tool, and then create the dm device with something like:
>
> echo 0 $SIZE csum $REALDEVICE 0 | dmsetup create $NAME
>
>
> I think it can be useful for people who want to detect data corruption and are
> either using the block layer directly or a filesystem that doesn't check data
> integrity (which are most, if not all, of the popular ones today). Maybe it
> could also be used for testing the bio-integrity extensions, although at the
> moment it's completely independent and I haven't looked much, but it's on my
> to-do list.
>
> It does NOT pretend to be useful for consistency checks for security purposes.
> Use something else if you do not want someone evil tampering with your data.
>
>
> Comments are obviously welcome. There are also some questions embedded in the
> code, if anyone cares to answer any of them, I'd really appreciate it.
>
> Thanks a lot,
> Alberto
How does that behave on crashes? Will checksums be out of sync with data?
Will pending blocks recalculate their checksum?
MfG
Goswin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-25 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-21 16:13 [RFC PATCH] dm-csum: A new device mapper target that checks data integrity Alberto Bertogli
2009-05-21 18:17 ` Greg Freemyer
2009-05-21 19:17 ` Alberto Bertogli
2009-05-25 12:22 ` Goswin von Brederlow [this message]
2009-05-25 17:46 ` Alberto Bertogli
2009-05-26 10:33 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-05-26 12:52 ` Alberto Bertogli
2009-05-28 19:29 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-06-26 7:26 ` SandeepKsinha
2009-06-26 8:50 ` SandeepKsinha
2009-06-26 22:36 ` Alberto Bertogli
2009-06-26 22:53 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-28 0:34 ` Neil Brown
2009-06-28 15:30 ` Alberto Bertogli
2009-06-28 22:59 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-05-26 19:48 ` [RFC PATCH v2] " Alberto Bertogli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87my91qsn4.fsf@frosties.localdomain \
--to=goswin-v-b@web.de \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=albertito@blitiri.com.ar \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).