Re: New setup: partitions or raw devices

[Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>]

On 2 Dec 2017, Reindl Harald outgrape:

> Am 02.12.2017 um 14:19 schrieb Nix:
>> If RAID-5 and RAID-6 had no benefits at all over RAID-10 it is unlikely
>> they would still be in wide use. They are, even for new installations,
>> because they truly do offer benefits for some use cases. They may not
>> for yours, but that doesn't mean they don't for anyone
>
> yes, when you need far more than 8 TB...

I can't figure out whether you're castigating people who need more than
8TiB, castigating people who need less, applauding people who need more
than 8TiB, applauding people who need less, saying that people who need
more than 8TiB should use RAID 10, saying that people who need more
should use RAID 6, or *what*. All I can tell is that you want to be as
unpleasant as possible while saying it. (I suspect this ambiguity is
intentional, so that no matter what people assume you meant, you can
flame them for not interpreting it the other way.)

But then that's not surprising because you've morphed again to try to
escape from people's killfiles. Back you go into mine, *yet again*.

-- 
NULL && (void)