linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [md PATCH 01/36] md: beginnings of bad block management.
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 01:52:22 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r55i45rt.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110721025847.8422.29443.stgit@notabene.brown> (NeilBrown's message of "Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:58:47 +1000")

NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> writes:

> This the first step in allowing md to track bad-blocks per-device so
> that we can fail individual blocks rather than the whole device.
>
> This patch just adds a data structure for recording bad blocks, with
> routines to add, remove, search the list.
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> ---
>
>  drivers/md/md.c |  457 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/md/md.h |   49 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 502 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> index 2a32050..220fadb 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@ -1952,6 +1952,10 @@ static void unbind_rdev_from_array(mdk_rdev_t * rdev)
>  	sysfs_remove_link(&rdev->kobj, "block");
>  	sysfs_put(rdev->sysfs_state);
>  	rdev->sysfs_state = NULL;
> +	kfree(rdev->badblocks.page);
> +	rdev->badblocks.count = 0;
> +	rdev->badblocks.page = NULL;
> +	rdev->badblocks.active_page = NULL;
>  	/* We need to delay this, otherwise we can deadlock when
>  	 * writing to 'remove' to "dev/state".  We also need
>  	 * to delay it due to rcu usage.
> @@ -2778,7 +2782,7 @@ static struct kobj_type rdev_ktype = {
>  	.default_attrs	= rdev_default_attrs,
>  };
>  
> -void md_rdev_init(mdk_rdev_t *rdev)
> +int md_rdev_init(mdk_rdev_t *rdev)
>  {
>  	rdev->desc_nr = -1;
>  	rdev->saved_raid_disk = -1;
> @@ -2794,6 +2798,20 @@ void md_rdev_init(mdk_rdev_t *rdev)
>  
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rdev->same_set);
>  	init_waitqueue_head(&rdev->blocked_wait);
> +
> +	/* Add space to store bad block list.
> +	 * This reserves the space even on arrays where it cannot
> +	 * be used - I wonder if that matters
> +	 */
> +	rdev->badblocks.count = 0;
> +	rdev->badblocks.shift = 0;
> +	rdev->badblocks.page = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	rdev->badblocks.active_page = rdev->badblocks.page;
> +	spin_lock_init(&rdev->badblocks.lock);
> +	if (rdev->badblocks.page == NULL)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(md_rdev_init);
>  /*
> @@ -2819,8 +2837,11 @@ static mdk_rdev_t *md_import_device(dev_t newdev, int super_format, int super_mi
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  	}
>  
> -	md_rdev_init(rdev);
> -	if ((err = alloc_disk_sb(rdev)))
> +	err = md_rdev_init(rdev);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto abort_free;
> +	err = alloc_disk_sb(rdev);
> +	if (err)
>  		goto abort_free;
>  
>  	err = lock_rdev(rdev, newdev, super_format == -2);

Now error path at abort_free needs to free rdev->badblocks.page
otherwise there will be memory leaks.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-07-22 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-21  2:58 [md PATCH 00/36] md patches for 3.1 - part 2: bad block logs NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 01/36] md: beginnings of bad block management NeilBrown
2011-07-22 15:03   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  2:26     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-26  5:17       ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-22 16:52   ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2011-07-26  3:20     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 02/36] md/bad-block-log: add sysfs interface for accessing bad-block-log NeilBrown
2011-07-22 15:43   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  2:29     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-26  5:17       ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  8:48   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 15:03     ` [PATCH v2] md: add documentation for bad block log Namhyung Kim
2011-07-27  1:05     ` [md PATCH 02/36] md/bad-block-log: add sysfs interface for accessing bad-block-log NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 04/36] md: load/store badblock list from v1.x metadata NeilBrown
2011-07-22 16:34   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 03/36] md: don't allow arrays to contain devices with bad blocks NeilBrown
2011-07-22 15:47   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 05/36] md: Disable bad blocks and v0.90 metadata NeilBrown
2011-07-22 17:02   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 13/36] md/raid1: Handle write errors by updating badblock log NeilBrown
2011-07-27 15:28   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 08/36] md: add 'write_error' flag to component devices NeilBrown
2011-07-26 15:22   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 14/36] md/raid1: record badblocks found during resync etc NeilBrown
2011-07-27 15:39   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 07/36] md/raid1: avoid reading known bad blocks during resync NeilBrown
2011-07-26 14:25   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 11/36] md/raid1: clear bad-block record when write succeeds NeilBrown
2011-07-27  5:05   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 06/36] md/raid1: avoid reading from known bad blocks NeilBrown
2011-07-26 14:06   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 10/36] md/raid1: avoid writing to known-bad blocks on known-bad drives NeilBrown
2011-07-27  4:09   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-27  4:19     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 12/36] md/raid1: store behind-write pages in bi_vecs NeilBrown
2011-07-27 15:16   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 09/36] md: make it easier to wait for bad blocks to be acknowledged NeilBrown
2011-07-26 16:04   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-27  1:18     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 19/36] md/raid5: write errors should be recorded as bad blocks if possible NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 23/36] md/raid10: Split handle_read_error out from raid10d NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 16/36] md/raid1: factor several functions out or raid1d() NeilBrown
2011-07-27 15:55   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-28  1:39     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 24/36] md/raid10: avoid reading from known bad blocks - part 1 NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 21/36] md/raid5: Clear bad blocks on successful write NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 15/36] md/raid1: improve handling of read failure during recovery NeilBrown
2011-07-27 15:45   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 17/36] md/raid5: avoid reading from known bad blocks NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 22/36] md/raid10: simplify/reindent some loops NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 18/36] md/raid5: use bad-block log to improve handling of uncorrectable read errors NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 20/36] md/raid5. Don't write to known bad block on doubtful devices NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 27/36] md/raid10: avoid reading known bad blocks during resync/recovery NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 33/36] md/raid10: record bad blocks due to write errors " NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 29/36] md/raid10: avoid writing to known bad blocks on known bad drives NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 30/36] md/raid10: clear bad-block record when write succeeds NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 26/36] md/raid10 - avoid reading from known bad blocks - part 3 NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 32/36] md/raid10: attempt to fix read errors during resync/check NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 31/36] md/raid10: Handle write errors by updating badblock log NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 25/36] md/raid10: avoid reading from known bad blocks - part 2 NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 34/36] md/raid10: simplify read error handling during recovery NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 28/36] md/raid10 record bad blocks as needed " NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 36/36] md/raid10: handle further errors during fix_read_error better NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 35/36] md/raid10: Handle read errors during recovery better NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r55i45rt.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=namhyung@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).