From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
To: Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@gmail.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
raz ben yehuda <raziebe@013.net>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
Jacek Danecki <jacek.danecki@intel.com>,
"Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Subject: [001/002 ] raid0 reshape
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 14:19:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r5ydqsrd.fsf@frosties.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87f94c370905211220n4e686a30ke452a56a2690d22b@mail.gmail.com> (Greg Freemyer's message of "Thu, 21 May 2009 15:20:42 -0400")
Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@gmail.com> writes:
> ==> What I mean by raid equivalent levels
>
> More and more arrays allow the user to simply say "give me a 100 GB
> logical volume with Raid 5 equivalent protection. The array then
> looks at the drives it has available and puts together the necessary
> pieces. As drives are added, removed it moves the data around under
> its own control, but maintains the raid equivalent protection.
>
> Especially when working with dozens of drives and lots of logical
> volumes it makes life much easier. Admittedly it may come at a cost
> of not being able to specify raid levels with the specificity that
> mdraid currently allows.
>
> ==>
>
> The reason I ask if this is the goal is that doing so may factor into
> decisions about how reshaping is implemented.
>
> Greg
That really seems to scream for LVM to support more raid levels. It
already has linear, raid0 and raid1 support (although I have no idea
how device mapper raid1 compares to md raid1).
Those should be fleshed out more and also support raid 4/5/6 for what
you ask.
MfG
Goswin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-25 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-02 21:46 Subject: [001/002 ] raid0 reshape raz ben yehuda
2009-05-10 22:31 ` Neil Brown
2009-05-12 16:59 ` Raz
2009-05-19 18:09 ` Dan Williams
2009-05-19 22:27 ` Raz
2009-05-21 11:48 ` Neil Brown
2009-05-21 12:33 ` OT: busting a gut (was Re: Subject: [001/002 ] raid0 reshape) John Robinson
2009-05-21 19:20 ` Subject: [001/002 ] raid0 reshape Greg Freemyer
2009-05-25 12:19 ` Goswin von Brederlow [this message]
2009-05-25 20:06 ` Raz
2009-05-27 21:55 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-05-25 22:14 ` Neil Brown
2009-05-26 11:17 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-05-26 11:51 ` Neil Brown
2009-05-28 19:07 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-05-22 7:53 ` Dan Williams
2009-05-23 22:33 ` Raz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r5ydqsrd.fsf@frosties.localdomain \
--to=goswin-v-b@web.de \
--cc=Marcin.Labun@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=greg.freemyer@gmail.com \
--cc=jacek.danecki@intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=raziebe@013.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).