From: Turbo Fredriksson <turbo@bayour.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-raid compatable w/ Adaptec AIC-7902?
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 13:27:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r7eex14d.fsf@pumba.bayour.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200506301014.11454.eric@pretorious.net> (Eric Pretorious's message of "Thu, 30 Jun 2005 10:14:11 -0700")
>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Pretorious <eric@pretorious.net> writes:
Eric> On Wednesday 29 June 2005 07:10 pm, Guy wrote:
>>> md: delaying resync of md0 until md2 has finished resync (they
>>> share one or more physical units) md: delaying resync of md1
>>> until md2 has finished resync (they share one or more physical
>>> units) ...
>>>
>>> Should I be concerned by the last two lines?
>> No, this is normal. Your 3 arrays are on the same disk(s). In
>> this case, it is faster to do them 1 at a time.
Eric> Oh - I get it: md can only work on one RAID at a time
Eric> because md0, md1, & md2 are all on sda & sdb (i.e., sda is
Eric> mirrored on sdb). Thanks!
I'm not DELIBERATELY trying to be rude here, but I want you to find the
answer yourself... :)
WHY are you putting multiple md's on the same disks? Did you intend to
do something like this?
md0 /boot sd[ab]1
md1 / sd[ab]2
md2 /usr sd[ab]3
md3 /var sd[ab]4
Just one question (this is the magic :). What do you gain by this? And
why do you do it?
--
Marxist Albanian quiche NSA critical FBI Honduras radar president
cracking assassination FSF cryptographic DES Mossad
[See http://www.aclu.org/echelonwatch/index.html for more about this]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-04 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-29 22:38 linux-raid compatable w/ Adaptec AIC-7902? Eric Pretorious
2005-06-29 22:57 ` Eric Pretorious
2005-06-29 23:57 ` Eric Pretorious
2005-06-29 23:55 ` Eric Pretorious
2005-06-30 2:10 ` Guy
2005-06-30 17:14 ` Eric Pretorious
2005-07-04 11:27 ` Turbo Fredriksson [this message]
2005-07-07 18:49 ` Eric Pretorious
2005-07-08 0:35 ` Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
2005-07-08 12:40 ` Turbo Fredriksson
2005-07-08 12:52 ` Joshua Baker-LePain
2005-07-08 22:56 ` Mark Hahn
2005-07-08 23:20 ` Tyler
2005-06-30 0:38 ` Eric Pretorious
2005-06-30 1:08 ` Eric Pretorious
2005-06-30 15:51 ` Dinesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r7eex14d.fsf@pumba.bayour.com \
--to=turbo@bayour.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).