From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md: don't use flush_signals in userspace processes
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 11:55:03 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87shja9b7s.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1706081847150.3603@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2326 bytes --]
On Thu, Jun 08 2017, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, NeilBrown wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 07 2017, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>>
>> > The function flush_signals clears all pending signals for the process. It
>> > may be used by kernel threads when we need to prepare a kernel thread for
>> > responding to signals. However using this function for an userspaces
>> > processes is incorrect - clearing signals without the program expecting it
>> > can cause misbehavior.
>> >
>> > The raid1 and raid5 code uses flush_signals in its request routine because
>> > it wants to prepare for an interruptible wait. This patch drops
>> > flush_signals and uses sigprocmask instead to block all signals (including
>> > SIGKILL) around the schedule() call. The signals are not lost, but the
>> > schedule() call won't respond to them.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
>> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>
>> Thanks for catching that!
>>
>> Acked-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
>>
>> NeilBrown
>
> BTW. why does md_thread do "allow_signal(SIGKILL)" and then
> "if (signal_pending(current)) flush_signals(current)"?
>
> Does userspace really send SIGKILL to MD kernel threads? The SIGKILL will
> be lost when flush_signals is called, so it looks quite dubious.
>
This is for md_check_recovery() which does do something on a signal.
Chances are good that it will get to handle the signal before
md_thread() flushed them, but not guaranteed. I could be improved I
guess.
Or maybe it could be discarded - the md_check_recovery() thing.
The idea was that if you alt-sysrq-K to kill all processes, md arrays
would go into immediate-safe-mode where the metadata is marked clean
immediately after writes finish, rather than waiting a few seconds. The
chance of having a clean array after shutdown is hopefully improved.
I've never actually used this though, and I doubt many people know about
it. And bitmaps make it fairly pointless.
So I wouldn't object much if
allow_signal(SIGKILL);
and
if (signal_pending(current)) {
if (mddev->pers->sync_request && !mddev->external) {
pr_debug("md: %s in immediate safe mode\n",
mdname(mddev));
mddev->safemode = 2;
}
flush_signals(current);
}
were removed.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-09 1:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-07 23:05 [PATCH] md: don't use flush_signals in userspace processes Mikulas Patocka
2017-06-08 6:59 ` NeilBrown
2017-06-08 17:15 ` Shaohua Li
2017-06-08 20:51 ` Mikulas Patocka
2017-06-08 21:24 ` NeilBrown
2017-06-08 22:58 ` Shaohua Li
2017-06-09 1:49 ` NeilBrown
2017-06-08 22:52 ` Mikulas Patocka
2017-06-09 1:55 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2017-06-09 3:27 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87shja9b7s.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox