From: Neil Brown <nfbrown@novell.com>
To: "Rainer Fügenstein" <rfu@oudeis.org>,
Linux-RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 60s! [md0_raid5:1614]
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:15:59 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87si5bvcj4.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1092031595.20151015153830@oudeis.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2641 bytes --]
Rainer Fügenstein <rfu@oudeis.org> writes:
> Hi,
>
> my NAS-like server with 5*3TB SATA drives in RAID5 configuration was
> running without problems for what seems an eternity; since about 3
> weeks it keeps freezing every other day with the following error:
>
> # grep soft /var/log/messages
> Oct 15 11:26:49 alfred kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 60s! [md0_raid5:1614]
> Oct 15 11:26:49 alfred kernel: [<ffffffff8005e298>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
> Oct 15 11:26:49 alfred kernel: [<ffffffff80012583>] __do_softirq+0x51/0x133
> Oct 15 11:26:49 alfred kernel: [<ffffffff8005e298>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
> Oct 15 11:26:49 alfred kernel: [<ffffffff8006d63a>] do_softirq+0x2c/0x7d
> Oct 15 11:27:49 alfred kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 60s! [md0_raid5:1614]
> Oct 15 11:27:49 alfred kernel: [<ffffffff8005e298>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
> Oct 15 11:27:49 alfred kernel: [<ffffffff80012583>] __do_softirq+0x51/0x133
> Oct 15 11:27:49 alfred kernel: [<ffffffff8005e298>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
> Oct 15 11:27:49 alfred kernel: [<ffffffff8006d63a>] do_softirq+0x2c/0x7d
> Oct 15 11:28:49 alfred kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 60s! [md0_raid5:1614]
> Oct 15 11:28:49 alfred kernel: [<ffffffff8005e298>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
> Oct 15 11:28:49 alfred kernel: [<ffffffff80012583>] __do_softirq+0x51/0x133
> Oct 15 11:28:49 alfred kernel: [<ffffffff8005e298>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
> Oct 15 11:28:49 alfred kernel: [<ffffffff8006d63a>] do_softirq+0x2c/0x7d
> [...]
> this is only part of the story, check the end of this message for
> a detailed log.
>
> sometimes the server recovers after 60+ seconds, sometimes it requires
> a hard reset (causing mdraid to re-sync the whole array).
I strongly recommend adding a write-intend bitmap
mdadm --grow /dev/md0 --bitmap=internal
that will speed up the resync enormously.
>
> IIRC, it started when a drive in the array failed with "SATA
> connection timeouts" (kind of). this drive has been replaced by a new
> one, but yet the CPU lockups keep coming.
>
> I suspect that aging hardware slowly starts to fail, but not sure
> which part (drives? SATA controller? cables? NIC? CPU? ...)
>
> here's some info that might be useful:
> # uname -a
> Linux alfred 2.6.18-406.el5 #1 SMP Tue Jun 2 17:25:57 EDT 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
This is a rather ancient kernel.
The "el" suffix probably suggests Redhat? If you have a Redhat support
contract you should ask them. If you don't, you should probably try a
newer kernel (or buy a support contract).
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-16 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-15 13:38 kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 60s! [md0_raid5:1614] Rainer Fügenstein
2015-10-16 1:15 ` Neil Brown [this message]
2015-10-16 19:31 ` Rainer Fügenstein
2015-10-24 16:15 ` performance issue (was: Re: kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 60s!) Rainer Fügenstein
2015-10-24 16:31 ` Roman Mamedov
2015-10-25 19:23 ` Rainer Fügenstein
2015-10-25 20:08 ` Neil Brown
2015-10-25 20:32 ` Rainer Fügenstein
2015-10-25 21:10 ` Neil Brown
2015-11-02 22:55 ` performance issue Rainer Fügenstein
2015-11-03 1:34 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87si5bvcj4.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=nfbrown@novell.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rfu@oudeis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).