public inbox for linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
To: John Robinson <john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk>
Cc: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>,
	Linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Poor write performance with write-intent bitmap?
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:02:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87skk0947d.fsf@frosties.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49EF108D.4070605@anonymous.org.uk> (John Robinson's message of "Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:41:49 +0100")

John Robinson <john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk> writes:

> On 22/04/2009 10:16, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> John Robinson <john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk> writes:
>>> Can't do that, my root filesystem is on the RAID-5, and part of the
>>> reason for wanting the bitmap is because the md can't be stopped while
>>> shutting down, so it was always wanting to resync at startup, which is
>>> rather tedious.
>>
>> Normal shutdown should put the raid in read-only mode as last step. At
>> least Debian does that. That way even a mounted raid will be clean
>> after reboot.
>
> Yes, I would have thought it should as well. But I've just looked at
> CentOS 5's /etc/rc.d/halt and as far as I can see it doesn't try to
> switch md devices to read-only. Of course the root filesystem has gone
> read-only but as we know that doesn't mean the device underneath it
> gets told that. In particular we know that ext3 normally opens its
> device read-write even when you're mounting the filesystem read-only
> (iirc it's so it can replay the journal).
>
> Another issue might be the LVM layer; does that need to be stopped or
> switched to read-only too?

Debian does

/sbin/vgchange -aln --ignorelockingfailure || return 2

before S60mdadm-raid, S60umountroot and S90reboot.


>> I would also suggest restructuring your system like this:
>>
>> sdX1 1GB  raid1  / (+/boot)
>> sdX2 rest raid5  lvm with /usr, /var, /home, ...
>>
>> Both / and /usr can usualy be read-only preventing any filesystem
>> corruption and raid resyncs in that part of the raid.
>
> I did do this multiple partition/LV thing once upon a time, but I got
> fed up with having to resize things when one partition was full and
> others empty. The machine is primarily a fileserver and Xen host, so
> the dom0 only has 40GB of its own, and I couldn't be bothered
> splitting that up. Having said all this, your suggestion is a good
> one, it's just my preference to have it otherwise :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> John.

I've been using a 1GB / for years and years now so that won't be a
problem. As for the rest one can also bind mount /usr, /var, /home to
/mnt/space/* respectively. I.e. have just 2 (/ and everything else)
partitions.

Esspecially for XEN hosts I find LVM verry usefull. Makes it easy to
create new logical volumes for new xen domains.

MfG
        Goswin

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-22 14:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-20 17:12 Performance of a software raid 5 Johannes Segitz
2009-04-20 23:46 ` John Robinson
2009-04-21  0:10   ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-21  0:52     ` John Robinson
2009-04-21  1:05       ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-21  1:12         ` John Robinson
2009-04-21  1:19         ` NeilBrown
2009-04-21  2:04           ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-21  5:46             ` Neil Brown
2009-04-21 12:40               ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-24 13:49                 ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-26 17:03               ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-21 18:56             ` Corey Hickey
2009-04-22 12:29               ` Bill Davidsen
2009-04-22 22:32                 ` Corey Hickey
2009-04-22  9:07           ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-21  0:44   ` Poor write performance with write-intent bitmap? John Robinson
2009-04-21  1:33     ` NeilBrown
2009-04-21  2:13       ` John Robinson
2009-04-21  5:50         ` Neil Brown
2009-04-21 12:05           ` John Robinson
2009-05-22 23:00             ` Redeeman
2009-04-22  9:16         ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-22 12:41           ` John Robinson
2009-04-22 14:02             ` Goswin von Brederlow [this message]
2009-04-23  7:48               ` John Robinson
2009-04-22 14:21             ` Andre Noll
2009-04-23  8:04               ` John Robinson
2009-04-23 20:23                 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-21 16:00       ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87skk0947d.fsf@frosties.localdomain \
    --to=goswin-v-b@web.de \
    --cc=john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox