linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, kumba@gentoo.org,
	Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md/bitmap: avoid read out of the disk
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 08:44:17 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tvz4m47i.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171012173019.c2bbfyz3hgudjbhz@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2143 bytes --]

On Thu, Oct 12 2017, Shaohua Li wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 02:09:21PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 10 2017, Shaohua Li wrote:
>> 
>> > From: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
>> >
>> > If PAGE_SIZE is bigger than 4k, we could read out of the disk boundary. Limit
>> > the read size to the end of disk. Write path already has similar limitation.
>> >
>> > Fix: 8031c3ddc70a(md/bitmap: copy correct data for bitmap super)
>> > Reported-by: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>
>> > Tested-by: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>
>> > Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
>> 
>> Given that this bug was introduced by
>> Commit: 8031c3ddc70a ("md/bitmap: copy correct data for bitmap super")
>> 
>> and that patch is markted:
>> 
>>     Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org (4.10+)
>> 
>> I think this patch should be tagged "CC: stable" too.
>
> I thought the Fix tag is enough, but I'll add the stable 

My experience is that Fixes: sometimes causes patched to go to stable,
but not always.  Cc: stable *always* causes the stable team to look at
the patch.
I prefer to keep each having a well defined meaning.  Fixes is
documentation about a relationship between commits, Cc:stable is a
statement about the importance of a patch.

Thanks,
Neilbrown


>> However ... that earlier patch looks strange to me.
>> Why is it that "raid5 cache could write bitmap superblock before bitmap superblock is
>> initialized."  Can we just get raid5 cache *not* to write the bitmap
>> superblock too early?
>> I think that would better than breaking code that previously worked.
>
> That's the log reply code, which must update superblock and hence bitmap
> superblock, because reply happens very earlier. I agree the reply might still
> have problem with bitmap. We'd better defer reply after the raid is fully
> initialized. Song, any idea?
>
> Thanks,
> Shaohua 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-12 21:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-10 21:20 [PATCH] md/bitmap: avoid read out of the disk Shaohua Li
2017-10-11 12:41 ` Joshua Kinard
2017-10-12  3:09 ` NeilBrown
2017-10-12 17:30   ` Shaohua Li
2017-10-12 17:53     ` Song Liu
2017-10-12 21:46       ` NeilBrown
2017-10-12 22:51         ` Shaohua Li
2017-10-13  5:16       ` NeilBrown
2017-10-13 19:51         ` Shaohua Li
2017-10-16 16:21           ` Song Liu
2017-10-16 21:15             ` NeilBrown
2017-10-16 23:56               ` Shaohua Li
2017-10-17  3:24                 ` [PATCH] md: forbid a RAID5 from having both a bitmap and a journal NeilBrown
2017-10-17 20:41                   ` John Stoffel
2017-10-17 21:03                     ` NeilBrown
2017-10-18  1:51                       ` Joshua Kinard
2017-10-19 23:16                         ` Wols Lists
2017-10-18 14:48                       ` John Stoffel
2017-10-19 23:21                         ` Wols Lists
2017-10-18  1:50                   ` Joshua Kinard
2017-10-19  3:16                   ` Shaohua Li
2017-10-12 21:44     ` NeilBrown [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87tvz4m47i.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
    --to=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=kumba@gentoo.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shli@fb.com \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).