From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Read errors on raid5 ignored, array still clean .. then disaster !!
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:06:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wrz337v1.fsf@frosties.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B601A5F.9050301@shiftmail.org> (asdo@shiftmail.org's message of "Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:50:07 +0100")
Asdo <asdo@shiftmail.org> writes:
> Giovanni Tessore wrote:
>> I didn't setup smart monitoring... Luca is right.
>> But I dont like the idea that md relies on another tool, that could
>> be not installed or correctly configured, to warn the user on
>> potential critical situations which involve directly itself.
>>
>> From the logs, it results that it did a "check" on md3 the 4 january
>> (first read errors at beginning of december, failure of other disk
>> 18 january); no read error occurred.
>> Looks like it did not help much :(
>> Maybe I was just very unluky
>
> It's strange... quite unlucky I'd say...
> Maybe the check needs to be run more frequently, like weekly.
> (Asdo taking notes... :-D)
> I also am not expert of this kind of statistics.
> FWIW I have seen two hardware raid controllers, and they do the scrub
> weekly by default. I don't know if they also run SMART tests.
>
> Also is it possible that you experienced an electricity surge or a
> physical shock on the computer?
>
> Obviously smart checks also help.
>
> Good luck
> Asdo
Or the check just does not report errors.
You need to read your syslog/kernel log to see read errors and check the
mismatch count after a check. Not all distributions do report mismatch
count != 0 after a check. Most don't I think.
MfG
Goswin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-27 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-26 22:28 Read errors on raid5 ignored, array still clean .. then disaster !! Giovanni Tessore
2010-01-27 7:41 ` Luca Berra
2010-01-27 9:01 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-01-29 10:48 ` Neil Brown
2010-01-29 11:58 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-01-29 19:14 ` Giovanni Tessore
2010-01-30 7:58 ` Luca Berra
2010-01-30 15:52 ` Giovanni Tessore
2010-01-30 7:54 ` Luca Berra
2010-01-30 10:55 ` Giovanni Tessore
2010-01-30 18:44 ` Giovanni Tessore
2010-01-30 21:41 ` Asdo
2010-01-30 22:20 ` Giovanni Tessore
2010-01-31 1:23 ` Roger Heflin
2010-01-31 10:45 ` Giovanni Tessore
2010-01-31 14:08 ` Roger Heflin
2010-01-31 14:31 ` Asdo
2010-02-01 10:56 ` Giovanni Tessore
2010-02-01 12:45 ` Asdo
2010-02-01 15:11 ` Giovanni Tessore
2010-02-01 13:27 ` Luca Berra
2010-02-01 15:51 ` Giovanni Tessore
2010-01-27 9:01 ` Asdo
2010-01-27 10:09 ` Giovanni Tessore
2010-01-27 10:50 ` Asdo
2010-01-27 15:06 ` Goswin von Brederlow [this message]
2010-01-27 16:15 ` Giovanni Tessore
2010-01-27 19:33 ` Richard Scobie
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-27 9:56 Giovanni Tessore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wrz337v1.fsf@frosties.localdomain \
--to=goswin-v-b@web.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox