From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nix Subject: Re: New setup: partitions or raw devices Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 16:18:32 +0000 Message-ID: <87y3mmzajr.fsf@esperi.org.uk> References: <7f6abcbc-7dfa-0252-e9df-984e7e637936@thelounge.net> <3654cb70-9d7c-dfc0-f57d-c57004f11f92@thelounge.net> <34e548a3-111a-909f-9683-8eae3efafdcc@thelounge.net> <46648c36-3a63-1524-995d-786620dc716e@thelounge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <46648c36-3a63-1524-995d-786620dc716e@thelounge.net> (Reindl Harald's message of "Wed, 29 Nov 2017 23:34:17 +0100") Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Reindl Harald Cc: Gandalf Corvotempesta , Linux RAID Mailing List List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 29 Nov 2017, Reindl Harald said: > Am 29.11.2017 um 23:25 schrieb Gandalf Corvotempesta: >> Look at one of Intel DC SSD, the S3610 1.6TB is about 1500 USD. Twice >> the price, 40% less capacity > > and do you really need them? > for what usecase? Not bricking or corrupting themselves when the power goes out. Intel DC SSDs are the only SSDs I have *ever* heard of surviving such tests. (btw, if you really are overprovisioning SSDS by hand, 2--5% is not remotely enough. 10% is not really enough. I'd go for 15--20%. -- NULL && (void)