From: Matthias Julius <jnews@julius-net.net>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: non-optimal RAID 5 performance with 8 drive array
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 17:23:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y8d3oxsh.fsf@julius-net.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 42246D1F.3070407@variant.ch
Nicola Fankhauser <nicola.fankhauser@variant.ch> writes:
> Hi all
>
> I have a RAID 5 array consisting of 8 300GB Maxtor SATA drives
> (6B300S0), hooked up to a Asus A8N-SLI deluxe motherboard with 4
> NForce4 SATA ports and 4 SiI 3114 ports.
>
> see [3] for a description of what I did and more details.
>
> each single disk in the array gives a read performance (tested with
> dd) of about 62MB/s (when reading the first 4GiB of a disk).
>
> the array (reading the first 8GiB from /dev/md0 with dd, bs=1024K)
> performs at about 174MiB/s, accessing the array through LVM2 (still
> with bs=1024K) only 86MiB/s.
>
> my first conclusion was to leave out the LVM2 of the loop and directly
> put a file system on /dev/md0.
>
> however, when reading Neil Brown's article [1], I got the impression
> that my system should perform better, given the fact that each disk
> has a transfer rate of minimally 37MiB/s, maximally 65MiB/s [2].
>
> or is there a flaw in my argumentation and the current performance is
> normal? are at last the controllers saturating?
>
> any suggestions are welcome.
Maybe you should try to measure performance by reading from all drives
directly in parallel. That might show hardware bottlenecks. The SiL
is certainly connected to the PCI and can surely not transmit 4 x 62
MB/s (theoretical maximum of PCI 133 MB/s).
Matthias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-04 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-01 13:24 non-optimal RAID 5 performance with 8 drive array Nicola Fankhauser
2005-03-01 17:53 ` Robin Bowes
2005-03-01 18:04 ` Roberto Fichera
2005-03-01 18:12 ` Robin Bowes
2005-03-01 18:41 ` Roberto Fichera
2005-03-02 23:08 ` dd with bytes/sec patch [was: non-optimal RAID 5 performance with 8 drive array] Tim Moore
2005-03-04 22:23 ` Matthias Julius [this message]
2005-03-06 14:25 ` non-optimal RAID 5 performance with 8 drive array Stephan van Hienen
2005-03-06 14:43 ` Nicola Fankhauser
2005-03-06 17:09 ` Stephan van Hienen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y8d3oxsh.fsf@julius-net.net \
--to=jnews@julius-net.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).