From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: adfas asd <chimera_god@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: Disappointing RAID10 Performance
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 05:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <883970.2319.qm@web38803.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <20091017060332339.ILNZ13254@cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20091017060332339.ILNZ13254@cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

--- On Fri, 10/16/09, Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@satx.rr.com> wrote:
> > Why would RAID10 performance be -poorer-?
> > If it weren't for mirroring, this wouldn't be worth
> it.
> 
> Is this with all drives local, or are you mirroring across
> a Gig-E link, as
> I believe you said you were going to do?

Do not have the remote array running yet, so all drives are local.