Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Ciechanowski, Ed" <ed.ciechanowski@intel.com>,
	"Neubauer, Wojciech" <Wojciech.Neubauer@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/4] Report new_disks number when migration is started
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:52:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <905EDD02F158D948B186911EB64DB3D192410313@irsmsx503.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110418103351.76f3f594@notabene.brown>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: NeilBrown [mailto:neilb@suse.de]
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 2:34 AM
> To: Kwolek, Adam
> Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org; Williams, Dan J; Ciechanowski, Ed;
> Neubauer, Wojciech
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Report new_disks number when migration is
> started
> 
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:30:22 +0200 Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > External metadata handler reports starting disks number during
> expansion
> > until migration is finished. It is opposite to native metadata
> behavior
> > where new disks number is reported immediately when expansion is
> started.
> > This causes problem during expansion restart and causes exception
> > due to wrong disks number information.
> >
> > This patch series unifies reported raid disks number. After reshape
> > is started external metadata handler reports new disks number now.
> >
> > BR
> > Adam
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Adam Kwolek (4):
> >       FIX: Count correctly added devices
> >       FIX: Set proper raid disks during migration
> >       FIX: Fiddle raid_disks number for external metadta
> >       FIX: Always report new raid_disks during migration
> >
> >
> 
> Thanks.  I've applied all this.
> 
> I change the second one a bit - please check that it still works for
> you.

Unfortunately it doesn't work.
During restart 3-disks raid5 to 5-disks expansion  it stops in reshape_array() on first condition after change (Grow.c:1695)
	reshape.before.raid_disks +reshape.parity != info->array.raid_disks 
where:
	reshape.before.raid_disks = 2
	reshape.parity = 1
	info->array.raid_disks = 5

It is used during restart only (checked for restart flag).

Do not you think that in this condition instead reshape.before.raid_disks, reshape.after.raid_disks should be used?
For both (native and external) metadata formats during reshape restart new raid_disks will be reported so 'after' filed should be used.
Patch for this will follow this post.

BR
Adam













> 
> Thanks.
> NeilBrown
> 
> 
> commit 178b8f353c4b4ffdf3bd4cd8c9dde37f64097da8
> Author: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
> Date:   Mon Apr 18 10:31:06 2011 +1000
> 
>     FIX: Fiddle raid_disks number when restarting reshape
> 
>     When restarting a reshape, the value of 'raid_disks' is the *new*
>     value.  The old value is found by subtracting delta_disks.
>     So before calling analyse_change we must set raid_disks to be the
>     old value, and then reset it afterwards.
> 
>     All other fields are cleanly separated with the main field being
>     the 'old' value and a new_* field available.
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
>     Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> 
> diff --git a/Grow.c b/Grow.c
> index 017a79d..9c1f096 100644
> --- a/Grow.c
> +++ b/Grow.c
> @@ -1676,8 +1676,10 @@ static int reshape_array(char *container, int fd,
> char *devname,
>  	if (info->reshape_active) {
>  		int new_level = info->new_level;
>  		info->new_level = UnSet;
> +		info->array.raid_disks -= info->delta_disks;
>  		msg = analyse_change(info, &reshape);
>  		info->new_level = new_level;
> +		info->array.raid_disks += info->delta_disks;
>  		if (!restart)
>  			/* Make sure the array isn't read-only */
>  			ioctl(fd, RESTART_ARRAY_RW, 0);

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-18 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-15 12:30 [PATCH 0/4] Report new_disks number when migration is started Adam Kwolek
2011-04-15 12:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] FIX: Always report new raid_disks during migration Adam Kwolek
2011-04-15 12:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] FIX: Fiddle raid_disks number for external metadta Adam Kwolek
2011-04-15 12:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] FIX: Set proper raid disks during migration Adam Kwolek
2011-04-15 12:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] FIX: Count correctly added devices Adam Kwolek
2011-04-18  0:33 ` [PATCH 0/4] Report new_disks number when migration is started NeilBrown
2011-04-18 10:52   ` Kwolek, Adam [this message]
2011-04-19  7:27     ` NeilBrown
2011-04-19  7:39       ` Kwolek, Adam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=905EDD02F158D948B186911EB64DB3D192410313@irsmsx503.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=adam.kwolek@intel.com \
    --cc=Wojciech.Neubauer@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=ed.ciechanowski@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox