From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: [PATCH 37/54] md/raid5: Replace a seq_printf() call by seq_puts() in raid5_status() Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 11:37:01 +0200 Message-ID: <92c52f1d-d151-cea6-e9ac-31378e6862d0@users.sourceforge.net> References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <786843ef-4b6f-eb04-7326-2f6f5b408826@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <786843ef-4b6f-eb04-7326-2f6f5b408826@users.sourceforge.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Guoqing Jiang , Jens Axboe , Mike Christie , Neil Brown , Shaohua Li , Tomasz Majchrzak Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall List-Id: linux-raid.ids From: Markus Elfring Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 14:40:27 +0200 The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following. WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring --- drivers/md/raid5.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c index ebcd692..7a825c0 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c @@ -7044,7 +7044,7 @@ static void raid5_status(struct seq_file *seq, struct mddev *mddev) rdev && test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) ? "U" : "_"); } rcu_read_unlock(); - seq_printf (seq, "]"); + seq_puts(seq, "]"); } static void print_raid5_conf(struct r5conf *conf) -- 2.10.1