From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PPC32] ADMA support for PPC 440SPe processors. Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:38:20 +0100 Message-ID: <9db80aa3f81b1c7fa6e7bb761b7642a3@kernel.crashing.org> References: <20070315232956.37DAB353A6C@atlas.denx.de> <200703170909.13869.sr@denx.de> <200703171943.27465.sr@denx.de> <1174320799.5044.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> <582f77296616b0b85ff7533bb7fea05c@kernel.crashing.org> <1174506924.10836.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <0e5aac2ffcd189dc51f59d5891b2366c@kernel.crashing.org> <20070322113857.GA13547@lst.de> <856c539083dbd89a6f71edfd46f502f0@kernel.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Linux/PPC Development , Christoph Hellwig , Dan Williams , Stefan Roese List-Id: linux-raid.ids >> That sounds nice. There are slightly fewer things called >> SPU than there are called SPE I imagine? Or is it just a >> historical misnomer. > > AFAIK SPE is the preferred name, as the SPU is only a part of the SPE. > That's what I was told. And you were told right. I was trying to be sarcastic here, but you missed it. Don't worry, it wasn't aimed at you anyway ;-) Segher