From: Carlos Mennens <carloswill@gmail.com>
To: Mdadm <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RAID Configuration For New Home Server
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 09:00:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTilAzPKlOMecKpQLIEPOqAhFDglR5STq3_QP_caW@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e35643473b05cc946fc35c0df2e85fcd.squirrel@mail.monkii.net>
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:54 AM, <tron@monkii.net> wrote:
> There are about as many answers to this as there are people using your
> setup so let's all agree that there's no "one way" of doing things.
Thanks for all the suggestions and you guys are right. There will no
right or wrong answer here but I just want to make sure I am not doing
anything that will hinder / limit performance in my system. At most my
system will simply idle and do nothing more than store a few files for
me so I think RAID5 is going to be my selection for my / file system.
I have 4 identical drives and need to partition them all the same to
avoid any inconsistencies across the RAID array. Since Grub doesn't
support RAID5 for /boot, I will need to make a 4 disk RAID1 for /boot
& do the same for Swap. Does this look reasonable to you guys?
Partitioning the 1st disk below:
/dev/sda1 100 MB - RAID (bootable)
/dev/sda2 2 GB - RAID
/dev/sda3 320 GB - RAID
Do that same partition schema above for all 4 drives and then create my RAID:
/
mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=5 --raid-devices=4 /dev/sda3 /dev/sdb3
/dev/sdc3 /dev/sdd3
/boot
mdadm --create /dev/md1 --level=1 --raid-devices=4 /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1
/dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1
Swap
mdadm --create /dev/md2 --level=1 --raid-devices=4 /dev/sda2 /dev/sdb2
/dev/sdc2 /dev/sdd2
Would you guys change anything in my partition or 'mdadm' command?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-02 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-01 17:08 RAID Configuration For New Home Server Carlos Mennens
2010-06-01 17:56 ` Mark Knecht
2010-06-01 22:59 ` Ryan Wagoner
2010-06-02 4:03 ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-06-02 6:08 ` Simon Matthews
2010-06-02 6:33 ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-06-02 7:51 ` tron
2010-06-02 14:24 ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-06-02 7:54 ` tron
2010-06-02 13:00 ` Carlos Mennens [this message]
2010-06-02 15:31 ` John Robinson
2010-06-05 17:45 ` Kristleifur Daðason
2010-06-05 17:19 ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-06-05 19:41 ` Mark Knecht
2010-06-05 23:56 ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-06-06 1:04 ` Keld Simonsen
2010-06-06 1:57 ` Simon Matthews
2010-06-06 2:01 ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-06-06 2:43 ` Mark Knecht
2010-06-06 5:19 ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-06-06 11:23 ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-06-06 14:56 ` Mark Knecht
2010-06-06 20:47 ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-06-06 14:50 ` Mark Knecht
2010-06-06 20:35 ` Leslie Rhorer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTilAzPKlOMecKpQLIEPOqAhFDglR5STq3_QP_caW@mail.gmail.com \
--to=carloswill@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).