From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@spadim.com.br>
To: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de>
Cc: "Eric D. Mudama" <edmudama@bounceswoosh.org>,
"Scott E. Armitage" <launchpad@scott.armitage.name>,
David Brown <david@westcontrol.com>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SSD - TRIM command
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:30:15 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimtdL31Nx+XCBy3EUiewnq87vF1SWjv3K_25=E_@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110209182426.GA2724@lazy.lzy>
nice =)
but check that parity block is a raid information, not a filesystem information
for raid we could implement trim when possible (like swap)
and implement a trim that we receive from filesystem, and send to all
disks (if it´s a raid1 with mirrors, we should sent to all mirrors)
i don´t know what trim do very well, but i think it´s a very big write
with only some bits for example:
set sector1='00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000'
could be replace by:
trim sector1
it´s faster for sata communication, and it´s a good information for
hard disk (it can put a single '0' at the start of the sector and know
that all sector is 0, if it try to read any information it can use
internal memory (don´t read hard disk), if a write is done it should
write 0000 to bits, and after after the write operation, but it´s
internal function of hard disk/ssd, not a problem of md raid... md
raid should need know how to optimize and use it =] )
2011/2/9 Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de>:
>> ext4 send trim commands to device (disk/md raid/nbd)
>> kernel swap send this commands (when possible) to device too
>> for internal raid5 parity disk this could be done by md, for data
>> disks this should be done by ext4
>
> That's an interesting point.
>
> On which basis should a parity "block" get a TRIM?
>
> If you ask me, I think the complete TRIM story is, at
> best, a temporary patch.
>
> IMHO the wear levelling should be handled by the filesystem
> and, with awarness of this, by the underlining device drivers.
> Reason is that the FS knows better what's going on with the
> blocks and what will happen.
>
> bye,
>
> pg
>
>>
>> the other question... about resync with only write what is different
>> this is very good since write and read speed can be different for ssd
>> (hd don´t have this 'problem')
>> but i´m sure that just write what is diff is better than write all
>> (ssd life will be bigger, hd maybe... i think that will be bigger too)
>>
>>
>> 2011/2/9 Eric D. Mudama <edmudama@bounceswoosh.org>:
>> > On Wed, Feb 9 at 11:28, Scott E. Armitage wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Who sends this command? If md can assume that determinate mode is
>> >> always set, then RAID 1 at least would remain consistent. For RAID 5,
>> >> consistency of the parity information depends on the determinate
>> >> pattern used and the number of disks. If you used determinate
>> >> all-zero, then parity information would always be consistent, but this
>> >> is probably not preferable since every TRIM command would incur an
>> >> extra write for each bit in each page of the block.
>> >
>> > True, and there are several solutions. Maybe track space used via
>> > some mechanism, such that when you trim you're only trimming the
>> > entire stripe width so no parity is required for the trimmed regions.
>> > Or, trust the drive's wear leveling and endurance rating, combined
>> > with SMART data, to indicate when you need to replace the device
>> > preemptive to eventual failure.
>> >
>> > It's not an unsolvable issue. If the RAID5 used distributed parity,
>> > you could expect wear leveling to wear all the devices evenly, since
>> > on average, the # of writes to all devices will be the same. Only a
>> > RAID4 setup would see a lopsided amount of writes to a single device.
>> >
>> > --eric
>> >
>> > --
>> > Eric D. Mudama
>> > edmudama@bounceswoosh.org
>> >
>> > --
>> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Roberto Spadim
>> Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> --
>
> piergiorgio
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Roberto Spadim
Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-09 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-07 20:07 SSD - TRIM command Roberto Spadim
2011-02-08 17:37 ` maurice
2011-02-08 18:31 ` Roberto Spadim
[not found] ` <AANLkTik5SumqyTN5LZVntna8nunvPe7v38TSFf9eCfcU@mail.gmail.com>
2011-02-08 20:50 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-08 21:18 ` maurice
2011-02-08 21:33 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-09 7:44 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-02-09 9:05 ` Eric D. Mudama
2011-02-09 15:45 ` Chris Worley
2011-02-09 13:29 ` David Brown
2011-02-09 14:39 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-09 15:00 ` Scott E. Armitage
2011-02-09 15:52 ` Chris Worley
2011-02-09 19:15 ` Doug Dumitru
2011-02-09 19:22 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-09 16:19 ` Eric D. Mudama
2011-02-09 16:28 ` Scott E. Armitage
2011-02-09 17:17 ` Eric D. Mudama
2011-02-09 18:18 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-09 18:24 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2011-02-09 18:30 ` Roberto Spadim [this message]
2011-02-09 18:38 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2011-02-09 18:46 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-09 18:52 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-09 19:13 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2011-02-09 19:16 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-09 19:21 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2011-02-09 19:27 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-21 18:24 ` Phillip Susi
2011-02-21 18:30 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-09 15:49 ` David Brown
2011-02-21 18:20 ` Phillip Susi
2011-02-21 18:25 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-21 18:34 ` Phillip Susi
2011-02-21 18:48 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-21 18:51 ` Mathias Burén
2011-02-21 19:32 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-21 19:38 ` Mathias Burén
2011-02-21 19:39 ` Mathias Burén
2011-02-21 19:43 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-21 20:45 ` Phillip Susi
2011-02-21 19:39 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-21 19:51 ` Doug Dumitru
2011-02-21 19:57 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-21 20:47 ` Phillip Susi
2011-02-21 21:02 ` Mathias Burén
2011-02-21 22:52 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-21 23:41 ` Mathias Burén
2011-02-21 23:42 ` Mathias Burén
2011-02-21 23:52 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-22 0:25 ` Mathias Burén
2011-02-22 0:30 ` Brendan Conoboy
2011-02-22 0:36 ` Eric D. Mudama
2011-02-22 1:46 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-22 1:52 ` Mathias Burén
2011-02-22 1:55 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-22 2:01 ` Eric D. Mudama
2011-02-22 2:02 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2011-02-22 2:22 ` Guy Watkins
2011-02-22 2:27 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-22 3:45 ` NeilBrown
2011-02-22 4:37 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-22 2:38 ` Phillip Susi
2011-02-22 3:29 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-22 3:42 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-22 4:04 ` Phillip Susi
2011-02-22 4:30 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-22 14:45 ` Phillip Susi
2011-02-22 17:15 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-02-22 0:32 ` Eric D. Mudama
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTimtdL31Nx+XCBy3EUiewnq87vF1SWjv3K_25=E_@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=roberto@spadim.com.br \
--cc=david@westcontrol.com \
--cc=edmudama@bounceswoosh.org \
--cc=launchpad@scott.armitage.name \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).