From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Matt Garman <matthew.garman@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: high throughput storage server?
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:36:50 -0600
Message-ID: <AANLkTin0X1CP5yMAQV_iwWNuaVPdvv9NwYYj6uu05KsC@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTik5_Zx98rSbmpgUtG82qtFObANtCcbnn-a7MXcp@mail.gmail.com>
	<4D5A8415.5000905@gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimT=JLvBTU52aZDYC5gwryXmsp4F+WbzsJNbSCC@mail.gmail.com>
	<4D5A9407.5000508@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4D5A9407.5000508@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Zdenek Kaspar <zkaspar82@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Zdenek Kaspar <zkaspar82@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dne 15.2.2011 15:29, Roberto Spadim napsal(a):
>> for hobby = SATA2 disks, 50USD disks of 1TB 50MB/s
>> the today state of art, in 'my world' is: http://www.ramsan.com/products/3
>
> I doubt 20TB SLC which will survive huge abuse (writes) is low-cost
> solution what OP wants to build himself..
>
> or 20TB RAM omg..

Just to be clear, this is *not* a hobby system.  I mentioned hobby
system in my original post just to serve as a reference for my current
knowledge level.  I've built and configured the simple linux md raid6
NAS box at home, and a similar system for backups here at work.

But now I'm looking at something that's obviously a completely
different game, with bigger and stricter requirements.