From: Tobias McNulty <tobias@caktusgroup.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: reshape failure
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:41:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTin__CDHu4qxAJe2NACXBFdE7EV1kuFOMoG7-P-h@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110217073247.2dbc9299@notabene.brown>
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:32 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:46:32 -0500 Tobias McNulty <tobias@caktusgroup.com>
>> nas:~# mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 --backup-file=md0.backup /dev/sdc
>> /dev/sdd /dev/sde /dev/sdf /dev/sdg /dev/sdh
>> mdadm: Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry.
>>
>> Is my data lost for good? Is there anything else I can do?
>
> Try above command with --verbose.
> If a message about "too-old timestamp" appears, run
>
> export MDADM_GROW_ALLOW_OLD=1
>
> and run the command again.
>
> In either case, post the output.
Wow - it looks like that might have done the trick:
nas:~# mdadm --verbose --assemble /dev/md0 --backup-file=md0.backup
/dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sde /dev/sdf /dev/sdg /dev/sdh
mdadm: looking for devices for /dev/md0
mdadm: /dev/sdc is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 3.
mdadm: /dev/sdd is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 2.
mdadm: /dev/sde is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 1.
mdadm: /dev/sdf is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 0.
mdadm: /dev/sdg is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 5.
mdadm: /dev/sdh is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 4.
mdadm:/dev/md0 has an active reshape - checking if critical section
needs to be restored
mdadm: too-old timestamp on backup-metadata on md0.backup
mdadm: Failed to find backup of critical section
mdadm: Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry.
nas:~# export MDADM_GROW_ALLOW_OLD=1
nas:~# mdadm --verbose --assemble /dev/md0 --backup-file=md0.backup
/dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sde /dev/sdf /dev/sdg /dev/sdh
mdadm: looking for devices for /dev/md0
mdadm: /dev/sdc is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 3.
mdadm: /dev/sdd is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 2.
mdadm: /dev/sde is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 1.
mdadm: /dev/sdf is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 0.
mdadm: /dev/sdg is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 5.
mdadm: /dev/sdh is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 4.
mdadm:/dev/md0 has an active reshape - checking if critical section
needs to be restored
mdadm: accepting backup with timestamp 1297624561 for array with
timestamp 1297692473
mdadm: restoring critical section
mdadm: added /dev/sde to /dev/md0 as 1
mdadm: added /dev/sdd to /dev/md0 as 2
mdadm: added /dev/sdc to /dev/md0 as 3
mdadm: added /dev/sdh to /dev/md0 as 4
mdadm: added /dev/sdg to /dev/md0 as 5
mdadm: added /dev/sdf to /dev/md0 as 0
mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 5 drives and 1 spare.
Now I see this in /etc/mdstat:
md0 : active raid6 sdf[0] sdg[5](S) sdh[4] sdc[3] sdd[2] sde[1]
5860543488 blocks super 0.91 level 6, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [5/5] [UUUUU]
[=>...................] reshape = 9.9% (193691648/1953514496)
finish=97156886.4min speed=0K/sec
Is the 0K/sec something I need to worry about?
Thanks!
Tobias
--
Tobias McNulty, Managing Partner
Caktus Consulting Group, LLC
http://www.caktusgroup.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-16 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-16 15:46 reshape failure Tobias McNulty
2011-02-16 20:32 ` NeilBrown
2011-02-16 20:41 ` Tobias McNulty [this message]
2011-02-16 21:06 ` NeilBrown
2011-02-17 21:39 ` Tobias McNulty
2011-05-11 18:06 ` Tobias McNulty
2011-05-11 21:12 ` NeilBrown
2011-05-11 21:19 ` Tobias McNulty
[not found] ` <BANLkTi=3-PgTqeGqyu5fPZMporA1vk6-Tw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-05-11 21:34 ` NeilBrown
2011-05-12 0:46 ` Tobias McNulty
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-09-03 21:39 Reshape Failure Jason Moss
2023-09-04 1:41 ` Yu Kuai
2023-09-04 16:38 ` Jason Moss
2023-09-05 1:07 ` Yu Kuai
2023-09-06 14:05 ` Jason Moss
2023-09-07 1:38 ` Yu Kuai
2023-09-07 5:44 ` Jason Moss
[not found] ` <79aa3cf3-78d4-cfc6-8d3b-eb8704ffaba1@huaweicloud.com>
2023-09-07 6:19 ` Jason Moss
2023-09-10 2:45 ` Yu Kuai
2023-09-10 4:58 ` Jason Moss
2023-09-10 6:10 ` Yu Kuai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTin__CDHu4qxAJe2NACXBFdE7EV1kuFOMoG7-P-h@mail.gmail.com \
--to=tobias@caktusgroup.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).