From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@spadim.com.br>
To: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: Re: raid1 boot regression in 2.6.37 [bisected]
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:59:37 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinvf_WM+9J6hoCHkz-qjMEaXOvv20ZyVLwmMsPV@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D90E580.7020406@intra2net.com>
that´s what i did, not a linux raid list opnion/experience:
i had some problems with hp server (the same model but G5) and new
intel core i7 desktops with archlinux and kernel 2.6.37, try to get a
older kernel version, just to make your production server stable
maybe some changes between kernel 3.6.32 and 3.6.37 made md working
worst, i will wait some changes at kernel, since realtime works are
being developed and many modifications are in work
using the same instalation process with archilnux using a dell (i
don´t remember the model, but i bought it in january 2011) removed the
problem (maybe a problem at hp sas interface/driver?! i didn´t tested
hp with dell interface)
2011/3/28 Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com>:
> On 03/28/2011 05:59 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> Call Trace:
>>> [<c12dc808>] mutex_unlock+0x8/0x10
>>> [<c11c4451>] kobj_lookup+0xe1/0x140
>>> [<c11323b0>] ? exact_match+0x0/0x10
>>> [<c11331b8>] get_gendisk+0x98/0xb0
>>> [<c10e85aa>] __blkdev_get+0xca/0x320
>>> [<c10e8843>] blkdev_get+0x43/0x2c0
>>> [<c12de75d>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1d/0x20
>>> [<c10e8b12>] blkdev_open+0x52/0x70
>>> [<c10bb12d>] __dentry_open+0x9d/0x240
>>> [<c10bb3c6>] nameidata_to_filp+0x66/0x80
>>> [<c10e8ac0>] ? blkdev_open+0x0/0x70
>>> [<c10c781f>] finish_open+0xaf/0x190
>>> [<c10c8a24>] ? do_path_lookup+0x44/0xe0
>>> [<c10c9920>] do_filp_open+0x210/0x6d0
>>> [<c10672e9>] ? lock_release_non_nested+0x59/0x2f0
>>> [<c12de75d>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1d/0x20
>>> [<c10d47d8>] ? alloc_fd+0xb8/0xf0
>>> [<c10baf45>] do_sys_open+0x55/0xf0
>>> [<c10bb049>] sys_open+0x29/0x40
>>> [<c1002e9f>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x38
>>
>> Hmmm... Weird.
>>
>> * blkid seems to be looping in blkdev_open() repeatedly calling
>> md_open() which keeps returning -ERESTARTSYS.
>>
>> * It triggered softlockup. Even with -ERESTARTSYS looping, I can't
>> see how that would be possible.
>>
>> Is this custom boot script? If so, do you use RT priority in the
>> script?
>
> It's a normal dracut installation with an additional custom script
> to trigger kernel raid auto detection via mdadm.
> The custom script was part of the initial post.
>
> I've also noticed another odd thing: On a HP Proliant ML110 G6 box,
> which is quite fast / SMP, the box brings up the software
> RAID successfully. The box is slow as hell and I can see a constant load
> on a kernel process (could be "kworker", don't remember it exactly).
> I'll try tomorrow if that is also related to the RAID subsystem
> or something else turning it into a PDP11...
>
> Thanks for your help so far!
>
> Cheers,
> Thomas
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Roberto Spadim
Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-28 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201103251725.21180.thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com>
2011-03-28 7:59 ` raid1 boot regression in 2.6.37 [bisected] Tejun Heo
2011-03-28 11:02 ` Thomas Jarosch
2011-03-28 12:53 ` Thomas Jarosch
2011-03-28 15:59 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-28 19:46 ` Thomas Jarosch
2011-03-28 19:59 ` Roberto Spadim [this message]
2011-03-29 12:06 ` Thomas Jarosch
2011-03-29 12:22 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-03-29 8:25 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-29 9:53 ` Thomas Jarosch
2011-03-29 10:07 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-29 11:52 ` Thomas Jarosch
2011-04-05 3:46 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-06 10:16 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-12 14:05 ` Thomas Jarosch
2011-04-12 22:44 ` NeilBrown
[not found] ` <201104261051.09464.thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com>
2011-04-27 8:17 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-27 10:05 ` NeilBrown
[not found] ` <201104271700.58894.thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com>
2011-04-28 1:23 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-28 13:47 ` Thomas Jarosch
2011-05-02 12:17 ` Thomas Jarosch
2011-03-25 18:55 Thomas Jarosch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTinvf_WM+9J6hoCHkz-qjMEaXOvv20ZyVLwmMsPV@mail.gmail.com \
--to=roberto@spadim.com.br \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).