From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@gmail.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID5: failing an active component during spare rebuild - arrays hangs
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:05:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTik+kjXHPzrp=bPDjZXz7N2j_n2NLw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinr_1GcbypCpxFKPXoid4DxTKvCag@mail.gmail.com>
Anyone???...
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> the kernel version is:
>
> root@ubuntu:~# uname -a
> Linux ubuntu 2.6.38-8-server #42-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 11 03:49:04 UTC
> 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> mdadm version is:
> root@ubuntu:~# mdadm -V
> mdadm - v3.1.4 - 31st August 2010
>
> Examining the three array components:
>
> root@ubuntu:~# mdadm -E /dev/sd{a,b,c}
> /dev/sda:
> Magic : a92b4efc
> Version : 1.2
> Feature Map : 0x1
> Array UUID : b5802763:fd4790dd:ee8bdeb2:2418097f
> Name : vc:zvp_1123
> Creation Time : Mon Jun 6 21:10:38 2011
> Raid Level : raid5
> Raid Devices : 3
>
> Avail Dev Size : 41940992 (20.00 GiB 21.47 GB)
> Array Size : 83879936 (40.00 GiB 42.95 GB)
> Used Dev Size : 41939968 (20.00 GiB 21.47 GB)
> Data Offset : 2048 sectors
> Super Offset : 8 sectors
> State : active
> Device UUID : 8db90071:be80216e:09468262:1f5046b1
>
> Internal Bitmap : 8 sectors from superblock
> Update Time : Mon Jun 6 21:10:46 2011
> Checksum : 2e424556 - correct
> Events : 10
>
> Layout : left-symmetric
> Chunk Size : 512K
>
> Device Role : Active device 0
> Array State : A.A ('A' == active, '.' == missing)
> /dev/sdb:
> Magic : a92b4efc
> Version : 1.2
> Feature Map : 0x1
> Array UUID : b5802763:fd4790dd:ee8bdeb2:2418097f
> Name : vc:zvp_1123
> Creation Time : Mon Jun 6 21:10:38 2011
> Raid Level : raid5
> Raid Devices : 3
>
> Avail Dev Size : 41940992 (20.00 GiB 21.47 GB)
> Array Size : 83879936 (40.00 GiB 42.95 GB)
> Used Dev Size : 41939968 (20.00 GiB 21.47 GB)
> Data Offset : 2048 sectors
> Super Offset : 8 sectors
> State : clean
> Device UUID : 9f41313b:b1aa70f8:6cf0ca2f:c6ea0a64
>
> Internal Bitmap : 8 sectors from superblock
> Update Time : Mon Jun 6 21:10:44 2011
> Checksum : 2d23c61 - correct
> Events : 8
>
> Layout : left-symmetric
> Chunk Size : 512K
>
> Device Role : Active device 1
> Array State : AAA ('A' == active, '.' == missing)
> /dev/sdc:
> Magic : a92b4efc
> Version : 1.2
> Feature Map : 0x3
> Array UUID : b5802763:fd4790dd:ee8bdeb2:2418097f
> Name : vc:zvp_1123
> Creation Time : Mon Jun 6 21:10:38 2011
> Raid Level : raid5
> Raid Devices : 3
>
> Avail Dev Size : 41940992 (20.00 GiB 21.47 GB)
> Array Size : 83879936 (40.00 GiB 42.95 GB)
> Used Dev Size : 41939968 (20.00 GiB 21.47 GB)
> Data Offset : 2048 sectors
> Super Offset : 8 sectors
> Recovery Offset : 999424 sectors
> State : active
> Device UUID : 61189a9d:ec082cea:a3ba32fb:800fe84b
>
> Internal Bitmap : 8 sectors from superblock
> Update Time : Mon Jun 6 21:10:46 2011
> Checksum : a47a059 - correct
> Events : 10
>
> Layout : left-symmetric
> Chunk Size : 512K
>
> Device Role : Active device 2
> Array State : A.A ('A' == active, '.' == missing)
>
> Details about the array:
>
> root@ubuntu:~# mdadm -Q --detail /dev/md1123
> /dev/md1123:
> Version : 1.2
> Creation Time : Mon Jun 6 21:10:38 2011
> Raid Level : raid5
> Array Size : 41939968 (40.00 GiB 42.95 GB)
> Used Dev Size : 20969984 (20.00 GiB 21.47 GB)
> Raid Devices : 3
> Total Devices : 3
> Persistence : Superblock is persistent
>
> Intent Bitmap : Internal
>
> Update Time : Mon Jun 6 21:10:46 2011
> State : active, FAILED
> Active Devices : 1
> Working Devices : 2
> Failed Devices : 1
> Spare Devices : 1
>
> Layout : left-symmetric
> Chunk Size : 512K
>
> Name : vc:zvp_1123
> UUID : b5802763:fd4790dd:ee8bdeb2:2418097f
> Events : 10
>
> Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
> 0 8 0 0 active sync /dev/sda
> 1 8 16 1 faulty spare rebuilding /dev/sdb
> 3 8 32 2 spare rebuilding /dev/sdc
>
>
> Basically, the thing is that the faulty (and the rebuilding spare)
> component are not kicked out of the array, and the array is stuck in
> this state.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex.
>
>
> 2011/6/6 Nagilum <nagilum@nagilum.org>:
> > Make sure you provide all relevant details such as kernel version, mdadm
> > version and maybe also mdadm -E /dev/sd{a,b,c}, mdadm -Q --detail /dev/md0,
> > ..
> >
> > ----- Message from alex.bolshoy@gmail.com ---------
> > Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 22:41:55 +0300
> > From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@gmail.com>
> > Subject: RAID5: failing an active component during spare rebuild - arrays
> > hangs
> > To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
> >
> >
> >> Hello everybody,
> >> I am testing a scenario, in which I create a RAID5 with three devices:
> >> /dev/sd{a,b,c}. Since I don't supply --force to mdadm during creation,
> >> it treats the array as degraded and starts rebuilding the sdc as a
> >> spare. This is as documented.
> >>
> >> Then I do --fail on /dev/sda. I understand that at this point my data
> >> is gone, but I think should still be able to tear down the array.
> >>
> >> Sometimes I see that /dev/sda is kicked from the array as faulty, and
> >> /dev/sdc is also removed and marked as a spare. Then I am able to tear
> >> down the array.
> >>
> >> But sometimes, it looks like the system hits some kind of a deadlock.
> >> mdadm --detail produces:
> >>
> >> Update Time : Sun Jun 5 21:54:34 2011
> >> State : active, FAILED
> >> Active Devices : 1
> >> Working Devices : 2
> >> Failed Devices : 1
> >> Spare Devices : 1
> >>
> >> Layout : left-symmetric
> >> Chunk Size : 512K
> >>
> >> Name : ubuntu:zvp_1123
> >> UUID : 48a15fb6:b6410bb9:a2ca173e:0092032c
> >> Events : 67
> >>
> >> Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
> >> 0 8 0 0 faulty spare rebuilding /dev/sda
> >> 1 8 16 1 active sync /dev/sdb
> >> 3 8 32 2 spare rebuilding /dev/sdc
> >>
> >> So the faulty device and the spare are not kicked out of the array. At
> >> this point I am unable to do anything with the array:
> >>
> >> root@ubuntu:~# sudo mdadm --stop /dev/md1123
> >> mdadm: failed to stop array /dev/md1123: Device or resource busy
> >> Perhaps a running process, mounted filesystem or active volume group?
> >> root@ubuntu:~# sudo mdadm /dev/md1123 --remove /dev/sda
> >> mdadm: hot remove failed for /dev/sda: Device or resource busy
> >> root@ubuntu:~# sudo mdadm /dev/md1123 --remove /dev/sdb
> >> mdadm: hot remove failed for /dev/sdb: Device or resource busy
> >> root@ubuntu:~# sudo mdadm /dev/md1123 --remove /dev/sdc
> >> mdadm: hot remove failed for /dev/sdc: Device or resource busy
> >>
> >> This is happening on ubuntu-natty, with mdadm - v3.1.4 - 31st August 2010.
> >> Looking at some code in mdadm/Detail.c, it looks like /dev/sda has
> >> been marked only as MD_DISK_FAULTY, but has not yet been kicked out of
> >> the array. The "spare" and "rebuilding" prints also result from that.
> >>
> >> Same thing also happens (sometimes) when I manually initiate resync
> >> (by writing 'repair' to 'sync_action'), and later manually failing one
> >> of the devices. Then I also saw messages like this in the syslog:
> >> Jun 5 21:42:00 ubuntu kernel: [ 2280.350454] INFO: task
> >> md1123_resync:7993 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> >> Jun 5 21:42:00 ubuntu kernel: [ 2280.350552] "echo 0 >
> >> /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> >> Jun 5 21:42:00 ubuntu kernel: [ 2280.350644] md1123_resync D
> >> 0000000000000000 0 7993 2 0x00000004
> >> Jun 5 21:42:00 ubuntu kernel: [ 2280.350647] ffff8800b56b1cd0
> >> 0000000000000046 ffff8800b56b1fd8 ffff8800b56b0000
> >> Jun 5 21:42:00 ubuntu kernel: [ 2280.350649] 0000000000013d00
> >> ffff880036c09a98 ffff8800b56b1fd8 0000000000013d00
> >> Jun 5 21:42:00 ubuntu kernel: [ 2280.350652] ffff8800b7f1adc0
> >> ffff880036c096e0 ffff8800b56b1cb0 ffff880036c56610
> >> Jun 5 21:42:00 ubuntu kernel: [ 2280.350654] Call Trace:
> >> Jun 5 21:42:00 ubuntu kernel: [ 2280.350657] [<ffffffff81492885>]
> >> md_do_sync+0xb45/0xc90
> >> Jun 5 21:42:00 ubuntu kernel: [ 2280.350660] [<ffffffff81087940>] ?
> >> autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
> >> Jun 5 21:42:00 ubuntu kernel: [ 2280.350663] [<ffffffff8107861b>] ?
> >> recalc_sigpending+0x1b/0x50
> >> Jun 5 21:42:00 ubuntu kernel: [ 2280.350665] [<ffffffff8148c516>]
> >> md_thread+0x116/0x150
> >> Jun 5 21:42:00 ubuntu kernel: [ 2280.350667] [<ffffffff8148c400>] ?
> >> md_thread+0x0/0x150
> >> Jun 5 21:42:00 ubuntu kernel: [ 2280.350669] [<ffffffff810871f6>]
> >> kthread+0x96/0xa0
> >> Jun 5 21:42:00 ubuntu kernel: [ 2280.350672] [<ffffffff8100cde4>]
> >> kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> >> Jun 5 21:42:00 ubuntu kernel: [ 2280.350674] [<ffffffff81087160>] ?
> >> kthread+0x0/0xa0
> >> Jun 5 21:42:00 ubuntu kernel: [ 2280.350676] [<ffffffff8100cde0>] ?
> >> kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
> >>
> >> This is pretty easy for me to reproduce.
> >>
> >> Basically, I would like to know what the user is expected to do when
> >> more than one RAID5 array component fails during rebuild/resync.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Alex.
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >>
> >
> >
> > ----- End message from alex.bolshoy@gmail.com -----
> >
> >
> >
> > ========================================================================
> > # _ __ _ __ http://www.nagilum.org/ \n icq://69646724 #
> > # / |/ /__ ____ _(_) /_ ____ _ nagilum@nagilum.org \n +491776461165 #
> > # / / _ `/ _ `/ / / // / ' \ Amiga (68k/PPC): AOS/NetBSD/Linux #
> > # /_/|_/\_,_/\_, /_/_/\_,_/_/_/_/ Mac (PPC): MacOS-X / NetBSD /Linux #
> > # /___/ x86: FreeBSD/Linux/Solaris/Win2k ARM9: EPOC EV6 #
> > ========================================================================
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > cakebox.homeunix.net - all the machine one needs..
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-21 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <BANLkTikkeoCsr3-UBSPEDrYwh4jGSn=MaA@mail.gmail.com>
2011-06-05 19:41 ` RAID5: failing an active component during spare rebuild - arrays hangs Alexander Lyakas
[not found] ` <20110605230014.14822hd7b50rcqww@cakebox.homeunix.net>
2011-06-06 18:19 ` Alexander Lyakas
2011-06-21 8:05 ` Alexander Lyakas [this message]
2011-06-22 2:54 ` NeilBrown
2011-06-26 18:13 ` Alexander Lyakas
2011-06-28 2:29 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-17 8:29 ` Alexander Lyakas
2011-08-25 8:59 ` Alexander Lyakas
2011-08-25 10:10 ` Alexander Lyakas
2011-08-31 2:46 ` NeilBrown
2011-11-27 9:56 ` Alexander Lyakas
2011-12-06 3:16 ` NeilBrown
2011-12-06 21:07 ` Alexander Lyakas
2011-12-06 21:21 ` NeilBrown
2011-12-14 10:27 ` Alexander Lyakas
2011-12-14 11:32 ` NeilBrown
2011-12-15 14:38 ` Alexander Lyakas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTik+kjXHPzrp=bPDjZXz7N2j_n2NLw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=alex.bolshoy@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).