linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linux Raid Study <linuxraid.study@gmail.com>
To: Linux Raid Study <linuxraid.study@gmail.com>,
	NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: iostat with raid device...
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 01:32:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTim4fenro-GQchqJ0JzrcDAcJXG0UQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110409085044.GB417@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk>

Hi Robin,

Thanks. So, the uneven (unequal) distribution of Wrtie/Sec numbers in
the iostat output are ok...is that correct?

Thanks.

On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Robin Hill <robin@robinhill.me.uk> wrote:
> On Fri Apr 08, 2011 at 05:40:46PM -0700, Linux Raid Study wrote:
>
>> What I'm not sure of is if the device is newly formatted, would raid
>> recovery happen? What else could explain difference in the first run
>> of IO benchmark?
>>
> When an array is first created, it's created in a degraded state - this
> is the simplest way to make it available to the user instantly. The
> final drive(s) are then automatically rebuilt, calculating the
> parity/data information as normal for recovering a drive.
>
> Cheers,
>    Robin
> --
>     ___
>    ( ' }     |       Robin Hill        <robin@robinhill.me.uk> |
>   / / )      | Little Jim says ....                            |
>  // !!       |      "He fallen in de water !!"                 |
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-11  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-08 19:55 iostat with raid device Linux Raid Study
2011-04-08 22:05 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-04-08 22:10   ` Linux Raid Study
2011-04-08 23:46 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-09  0:40   ` Linux Raid Study
2011-04-09  8:50     ` Robin Hill
2011-04-11  8:32       ` Linux Raid Study [this message]
2011-04-11  9:25         ` Robin Hill
2011-04-11  9:36           ` Linux Raid Study
2011-04-11  9:53             ` Robin Hill
2011-04-11 10:18               ` NeilBrown
2011-04-12  1:57                 ` Linux Raid Study
2011-04-12  2:51                   ` NeilBrown
2011-04-12 19:36                     ` Linux Raid Study
2011-04-13 18:21                       ` Linux Raid Study
2011-04-13 21:00                         ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BANLkTim4fenro-GQchqJ0JzrcDAcJXG0UQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=linuxraid.study@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).