linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@spadim.com.br>
To: Liam Kurmos <quantum.leaf@gmail.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Brad Campbell <lists2009@fnarfbargle.com>,
	Drew <drew.kay@gmail.com>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mdadm raid1 read performance
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 21:24:06 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimdzEFBr__07PnZHHWk+NF+Wm=vgA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=W=DNdqOBiGwbu67P1EgoEqNy+sg@mail.gmail.com>

2011/5/4 Liam Kurmos <quantum.leaf@gmail.com>:
> Thanks guys!
>
>
>
>>> raid10: 220MB/s
>>
>> Assuming the default 'n2' layout, I would expect 2*140 or 280, so this is a
>> little slow.  Try "--layout=f2" and see what you get (should be more like
>> RAID0).
>
>
> mdadm -C /dev/md0 --level=raid10 --layout=f2 --raid-devices=4
> /dev/sda1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 /dev/sde1
>
> dd if=/dev/md0 of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1000
> 1000+0 records in
> 1000+0 records out
> 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 2.23352 s, 469 MB/s
>
> :D
>
> awesome!!
>
>>
>>> raid5: ~165MB/s
>>
>> I would expect 3*140 or 420, so this is very slow.  I wonder if read-ahead is
>> set badly.
>
>> Can you:
>>   blockdev --getra /dev/md0
>> multiply the number it gives you by 8 and give it back with
>>   blockdev --setra NUMBER /dev/md0
>>
>
> genius.
>
> im not really sure what this did but it totally fixed the problem.
>
> look ahead was 768, set it 6144 and immediately got 400MB/s
>>
>>> raid1: ~140MB/s  (single disk speed)
>>
>> as expected.
>>
>>>
>>> for 4 disks raid0 seems like suicide, but for my system drive the
>>> speed advantage is so great im tempted to try it anyway and try and
>>> use rsync to keep constant back up.
>>
>> If you have somewhere to rsync to, then you have more disks so RAID10 might
>> be an answer... but I suspect you cannot move disks around that freely :-)
>>
>
> no need now! f2 layout is awesome.

hum, you should consider you application.....
for example, if you need a big ALTER TABLE (SQL database), that must
be very fast to don´t stop your production server, you should use f2
or raid0 ehehehe
but if you have a stable application that you need multiuser acess,
raid1 or n2 layout could be better

backup i´m running with raid10 f2, or raid1+raid0, and production
machine i´m using raid1 and linear to get more space

don´t forget to align partitions if you use it


>
> many thanks,
>
> Liam
>
>
>
>> NeilBrown
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> cheers for you responses,
>>>
>>> Liam
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>



-- 
Roberto Spadim
Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-05  0:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-04  0:07 mdadm raid1 read performance Liam Kurmos
2011-05-04  0:57 ` John Robinson
2011-05-06 20:44   ` Leslie Rhorer
2011-05-06 21:56     ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-04  0:58 ` NeilBrown
2011-05-04  5:30   ` Drew
2011-05-04  6:31     ` Brad Campbell
2011-05-04  7:42       ` Roberto Spadim
2011-05-04 23:08         ` Liam Kurmos
2011-05-04 23:35           ` Roberto Spadim
2011-05-04 23:36           ` Brad Campbell
2011-05-04 23:45           ` NeilBrown
2011-05-04 23:57             ` Roberto Spadim
2011-05-05  0:14             ` Liam Kurmos
2011-05-05  0:20               ` Liam Kurmos
2011-05-05  0:25                 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-05-05  0:40                   ` Liam Kurmos
2011-05-05  7:26                     ` David Brown
2011-05-05 10:41                       ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-05 11:38                         ` David Brown
2011-05-06  4:14                           ` CoolCold
2011-05-06  7:29                             ` David Brown
2011-05-06 21:05                       ` Leslie Rhorer
2011-05-07 10:37                         ` David Brown
2011-05-07 10:58                           ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-05  0:24               ` Roberto Spadim [this message]
2011-05-05 11:10             ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-06 21:20               ` Leslie Rhorer
2011-05-06 21:53                 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-07  3:17                   ` Leslie Rhorer
2011-05-05  4:06           ` Roman Mamedov
2011-05-05  8:06             ` Nikolay Kichukov
2011-05-05  8:39               ` Liam Kurmos
2011-05-05  8:49                 ` Liam Kurmos
2011-05-05  9:30               ` NeilBrown
2011-05-04  7:48       ` David Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='BANLkTimdzEFBr__07PnZHHWk+NF+Wm=vgA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=roberto@spadim.com.br \
    --cc=drew.kay@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lists2009@fnarfbargle.com \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=quantum.leaf@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).