From: Ole Tange <ole@tange.dk>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Software RAID checksum performance on 24 disks not even close to kernel reported
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 21:26:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+4vN7xjqbd-o2k4u3SM90xQ3-zHp+ei3H9Mr6TxAD__rYnoQQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABE8wws8u_bOwfv_j1gJicFbrwUQ4M_BFc7bMV2_+fJSkhL=mg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Ole Tange <ole@tange.dk> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
:
>>> Don't use CONFIG_MULTICORE_RAID456, we need a different approach.
>>
>> Here you disagree with Brad Campbell and Igor M Podlesny. Can you
>> elaborate why you do not think I should use CONFIG_MULTICORE_RAID456
>> and why you do not think that approach will work?
>
> Because I wrote the code and it doesn't work the way I want it to [...]
It can hardly be more authoritative than this :-)
/Ole
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-06 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-04 23:14 Software RAID checksum performance on 24 disks not even close to kernel reported Ole Tange
2012-06-05 1:26 ` Joe Landman
2012-06-05 3:36 ` Igor M Podlesny
2012-06-05 7:47 ` Ole Tange
2012-06-05 11:25 ` Peter Grandi
2012-06-05 20:57 ` Ole Tange
2012-06-06 17:37 ` Peter Grandi
2012-06-05 14:15 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-06-05 20:45 ` Ole Tange
2012-06-05 3:39 ` Igor M Podlesny
2012-06-05 7:47 ` Ole Tange
2012-06-05 11:29 ` Igor M Podlesny
2012-06-05 13:09 ` Peter Grandi
2012-06-05 21:17 ` Ole Tange
2012-06-06 1:38 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-06-05 18:44 ` Ole Tange
2012-06-06 1:40 ` Brad Campbell
2012-06-06 3:48 ` Marcus Sorensen
2012-06-06 11:21 ` Ole Tange
2012-06-06 11:17 ` Ole Tange
2012-06-06 12:58 ` Brad Campbell
2012-06-06 14:11 ` Ole Tange
2012-06-06 16:05 ` Igor M Podlesny
2012-06-06 19:51 ` Ole Tange
2012-06-06 22:21 ` Igor M Podlesny
2012-06-06 22:53 ` Peter Grandi
2012-06-07 3:41 ` Igor M Podlesny
2012-06-07 4:59 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-06-07 5:22 ` Igor M Podlesny
2012-06-07 9:03 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-06-07 9:22 ` Igor M Podlesny
2012-06-06 16:09 ` Dan Williams
2012-06-06 19:19 ` Ole Tange
2012-06-06 19:24 ` Dan Williams
2012-06-06 19:26 ` Ole Tange [this message]
2012-06-07 4:06 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-06-07 14:40 ` Joe Landman
2012-06-08 1:23 ` Stan Hoeppner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+4vN7xjqbd-o2k4u3SM90xQ3-zHp+ei3H9Mr6TxAD__rYnoQQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ole@tange.dk \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).