From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@gmail.com>
To: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
Cc: Wols Lists <antlists@youngman.org.uk>,
Phil Turmel <philip@turmel.org>,
David T-G <davidtg+robot@justpickone.org>,
Linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: hardware recovery and RAID5 services
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 12:59:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAMCDee0zoWB9ud6wxvfSj0rpswFde9dd2T3chur4R9YFnRPwQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87leyvvrqp.fsf@esperi.org.uk>
And do not do write-sector on a disk that is in use in RAID, otherwise
that sectors data is gone.
I will completely remove a disk/partition and do --write-sectors
against it and then do a --add (don't do a re-add). In general
though I have not had a lot of luck with the write-sector fixing
and/or forcing a reallocate even when the sector is clearly bad. I
have to conclude (based on both WD and seagate not reallocating
sectors that reliably fail rereads in <30-seconds after just being
re-written) that pretty much everyone's disk firmware must suck.
Would --make-bad-sector work to force a reallocate?
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 9:40 AM Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On 29 Jan 2022, Wols Lists told this:
>
> > I believe there is also a way of injecting a hardware error onto a
> > drive. Unless you can take a backup of the backup :-) I wouldn't
> > recommend it at the moment, but there's some ATA command or whatever
> > that tells the drive to flag a sector as bad, and return a read error
> > until it's over-written.
>
> See hdparm --make-bad-sector. The manpage says "EXCEPTIONALLY DANGEROUS.
> DO NOT USE THIS OPTION!!". It is not lying. :)
>
> (This is also --write-sector, which is merely VERY DANGEROUS, but can be
> used to force rewrites of bad sectors. Make sure you get the sector
> number right! Needless to say, if you don't, it's too late, and there's
> no real way to test in advance...)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-31 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-21 16:48 hardware recovery and RAID5 services David T-G
2022-01-21 19:31 ` Wols Lists
2022-01-21 19:34 ` Wols Lists
2022-01-21 19:47 ` Wols Lists
2022-01-22 14:23 ` Roger Heflin
2022-01-22 22:23 ` Phil Turmel
2022-01-23 0:20 ` anthony
2022-01-29 15:25 ` David T-G
2022-01-29 15:36 ` Wols Lists
2022-01-31 15:39 ` Nix
2022-01-31 18:59 ` Roger Heflin [this message]
2022-01-31 19:07 ` Geoff Back
2022-01-31 19:21 ` Phil Turmel
2022-01-31 19:46 ` Roger Heflin
2022-01-31 20:04 ` Geoff Back
2022-01-31 20:53 ` Wols Lists
2022-01-29 15:21 ` David T-G
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAMCDee0zoWB9ud6wxvfSj0rpswFde9dd2T3chur4R9YFnRPwQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rogerheflin@gmail.com \
--cc=antlists@youngman.org.uk \
--cc=davidtg+robot@justpickone.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nix@esperi.org.uk \
--cc=philip@turmel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).