From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Francis Moreau Subject: Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 22:10:54 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20130914064305.0baadc69@notabene.brown> <20130914203800.385466b2@notabene.brown> <5234CA6A.3070305@arcor.de> <52373A19.7000105@arcor.de> <523C8EF9.60809@arcor.de> <52409E62.3090105@arcor.de> <524C6711.3090805@arcor.de> <20131016155711.715678e7@notabene.brown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131016155711.715678e7@notabene.brown> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: NeilBrown Cc: Martin Wilck , linux-raid List-Id: linux-raid.ids Hi Neil, On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 6:57 AM, NeilBrown wrote: > On Wed, 02 Oct 2013 20:33:53 +0200 Martin Wilck wrote: > >> On 09/27/2013 05:47 PM, Francis Moreau wrote: >> >> > I finally found my issue: mdmon --takeover service wasn't started >> > anymore (probably I messed it up earlier). Therefore mdmon started by >> > initrd was used and wasn't working properly. >> >> Thanks a lot for finding this out, glad your system is working again. >> And sorry for having lost you and talking about the BIOS; I was thinking >> you were still working on fake BIOS hardware. >> >> > If you still want me to test something, please tell me. >> > >> > OTHO, it would be easier if you setup a git tree somewhere with your >> > patches that you want me to test. BTW I'm not subscribed to linux-raid >> > mailing list. >> >> I'll wait for Neil to come back and comment on my patches. It doesn't >> make sense for me right now to create my own repository. > > Hi, > I'm back from leave now :-) > Your patches look good - thanks a lots. > I think I have applied them all (though the numbering was a bit odd and I > might have missed something). > > I've lost track ... are there any outstanding issues here, or are we "done" ? > I think there's still one open issue when sequence numbers don't match during incremental assembly. Martin started addressing this in another new thread whose subject is "RFC: incremental container assembly when sequence numbers don't match" Thanks -- Francis