From: daobang wang <wangdb1981@gmail.com>
To: stan@hardwarefreak.com
Cc: "Marcus Sorensen" <shadowsor@gmail.com>,
"Mathias Burén" <mathias.buren@gmail.com>,
linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
"xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: RAID5 created by 8 disks works with xfs
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 10:33:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACwgYDPur_8sO-BhhP-ggEmPCGa5ddsCcmSDfCuhD9OgiwGRyw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACwgYDMEpFqJhtUGeRg4hvux3GigNRnA--V18DwdyUvJpY434w@mail.gmail.com>
There is another issue, i updated xfsprog from 2.10.1 to 3.1.5, and
found i could not make the xfs filesystem when the logical volume size
large than 8TB with command mkfs.xfs -f -i size=512
/dev/vg+vg00+20120406101850/lv+nxx+lv0000, this command seems hang, it
did not return for a long time, is there any parameter i should
adjust?
Thank you very much
Best Regards,
Daobang Wang.
On 4/6/12, daobang wang <wangdb1981@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have found the solution, i updated the xfsprogs from 2.10.1 to
> 3.1.5, and could repair it, Thanks.
>
> Best Wishes,
> Daobang Wang.
>
> On 4/6/12, Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com> wrote:
>> On 4/5/2012 1:48 AM, daobang wang wrote:
>>> Hi stan,
>>>
>>> I duplicated the input/output error issue, about the detail
>>> operations and logs, please see the attachments, Is there any way to
>>> fix this? thanks!
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Daobang Wang.
>>
>>
>> These fiilesystem issues have nothing to do with linux-raid. I'm
>> copying the XFS mailing list which is where this discussion should be
>> taking place from this point forward. Please reply-to-all, and paste
>> the output you previously attached, but inline this time.
>>
>> Also, since the XFS folks are unfamiliar with what you're doing up to
>> this point, please provide a basic description of your hardware/storage
>> setup, kernel version, mdraid configuration, xfs_info output as well as
>> your fstab XFS mount options, and a description of your workload.
>>
>> My best guess at this point as to the du and ls errors is that your
>> application is not behaving properly, or you're still running with XFS
>> barriers disabled, which, I say _loudly_ for the 2nd time, you should
>> NOT do in the absence of BBWC, which you stated you do not have.
>>
>> --
>> Stan
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-06 2:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-31 1:22 RAID5 created by 8 disks works with xfs daobang wang
2012-03-31 7:59 ` Mathias Burén
2012-03-31 20:09 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-01 1:16 ` daobang wang
2012-04-01 2:05 ` daobang wang
2012-04-01 5:13 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-01 3:51 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-01 5:12 ` daobang wang
2012-04-01 5:40 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-01 5:59 ` daobang wang
2012-04-01 6:20 ` daobang wang
2012-04-01 7:08 ` Marcus Sorensen
2012-04-02 3:47 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-05 0:48 ` daobang wang
[not found] ` <CACwgYDOtCoVF-p+KKqPYxHhA4vWF78Ueecx9hcVWLoyxFWzV9Q@mail.gmail.com>
2012-04-05 21:01 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-06 0:25 ` daobang wang
2012-04-06 2:33 ` daobang wang [this message]
2012-04-06 6:00 ` Jack Wang
2012-04-06 6:45 ` daobang wang
2012-04-06 6:49 ` daobang wang
2012-04-06 8:18 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-06 8:45 ` daobang wang
2012-04-06 11:12 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-18 2:23 ` daobang wang
2012-04-02 3:12 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-01 10:33 ` David Brown
2012-04-01 12:28 ` John Robinson
2012-04-02 6:59 ` David Brown
[not found] ` <CA+res+QkLi7sxZrD-XOcbR47CeJ5gADf7P6pa1w1oMf8CKSB4g@mail.gmail.com>
2012-04-02 8:01 ` John Robinson
2012-04-02 10:01 ` Jack Wang
2012-04-02 10:28 ` John Robinson
2012-04-02 20:41 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-02 5:43 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-02 7:04 ` David Brown
2012-04-02 20:21 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-01 4:52 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-01 8:06 ` John Robinson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACwgYDPur_8sO-BhhP-ggEmPCGa5ddsCcmSDfCuhD9OgiwGRyw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=wangdb1981@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.buren@gmail.com \
--cc=shadowsor@gmail.com \
--cc=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).