From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@gmail.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question about raid5 disk recovery logic
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 16:36:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGRgLy4jdP-ZhiPYMB=-4NYAC7YJsM2nX6SyJcgmMKHpp-FXhQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120701180053.504ba439@notabene.brown>
Thanks, Neil!
That clarifies.
Does this also mean, that when md_do_sync() gets to such
already-reconstructed stripe, it might reconstruct it once again,
unless the stripe stays in the stripe cache?
Thanks for helping,
Alex.
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 11:00 AM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2012 10:08:40 +0300 Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everybody,
>> I am trying to understand what happens when raid5 is recovering a
>> disk, and a write comes to a stripe that has not been recovered yet.
>> Does md first reconstruct the missing chunk and then applies the
>> write, or first the write is applied as if the array is still degraded
>> (and not recovering), and only later the missing chunk is
>> reconstructed (when the md_do_sync() loop gets to this area)?
>> I am looking at the stripe handling logic (kernel 2.6.38), can anybody
>> pls point me at the path that handle_stripe5() takes in that case?
>>
>>
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> The stripe is still degraded, so md/raid5 treats it like a write to a
> degraded array.
> Exactly what happens depends one which block is being written.
> If the block being written would be stored on the recovering devices, then
> md will perform a reconstruct-write. It will read the other data blocks,
> calculate the parity, and write out the parity and the changed data.
> Similarly if the parity block is on the recovering device a
> reconstruct-write will be needed.
> If some other block is being written, md will do a read-modify-write to
> calculate the new parity and then write out the parity and data. In this
> case the block on the recovering device will not be written.
>
> I hope that clarifies the situation.
>
> NeilBrown
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-01 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-01 7:08 Question about raid5 disk recovery logic Alexander Lyakas
2012-07-01 8:00 ` NeilBrown
2012-07-01 13:36 ` Alexander Lyakas [this message]
2012-07-01 21:44 ` NeilBrown
2012-07-02 8:32 ` Alexander Lyakas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGRgLy4jdP-ZhiPYMB=-4NYAC7YJsM2nX6SyJcgmMKHpp-FXhQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=alex.bolshoy@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).