From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@gmail.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>, linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: mismatches after growing raid1 and re-adding a failed drive
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 14:59:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGRgLy6YHMe-CRB1h4WHC-1xtdy5nURecf51LWu9WRaCy8Nw6w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi Neil,
testing the following scenario:
1) create a raid1 with drives A and B, wait for resync to complete
(verify mismatch_cnt is 0)
2) drive B fails, array continues to operate as degraded, new data is
written to array
3) add a fresh drive C to array (after zeroing any possible superblock on C)
4) wait for C recovery to complete
At this point, for some reason "bitmap->events_cleared" is not
updated, it remains 0, although the bitmap is clear.
5) grow the array by one slot:
mdadm --grow /dev/md1 --raid-devices=3 --forc
6) re-add drive B back
mdadm --manage /dev/md1 --re-add /dev/sdb
MD accepts this drive, because in super_1_validate:
/* If adding to array with a bitmap, then we can accept an
* older device, but not too old.
*/
if (ev1 < mddev->bitmap->events_cleared)
return 0;
Since events_cleared==0, this condition DOES NOT hold, and drive B is accepted
7) recovery begins and completes immediately as the bitmap is clear
8) issuing "echo check > ..." yields in a lot of mismatched
(naturally, as B's data was not synced)
Is this a valid scenario? Any idea why events_cleared is not updated?
Kernel is 3.8.13
Thanks,
Alex.
next reply other threads:[~2014-06-06 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-06 11:59 Alexander Lyakas [this message]
2014-06-10 0:21 ` mismatches after growing raid1 and re-adding a failed drive NeilBrown
2014-06-18 17:42 ` Alexander Lyakas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGRgLy6YHMe-CRB1h4WHC-1xtdy5nURecf51LWu9WRaCy8Nw6w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=alex.bolshoy@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).