Re: dirty chunks on bitmap not clearing (RAID1)

Re: dirty chunks on bitmap not clearing (RAID1)

[Chris Pearson]

I have the same problem.  3 chunks are always dirty.

I'm using 2.6.38-8-generic and mdadm - v3.1.4 - 31st August 2010

If that's not normal, then maybe what I've done differently is that I
created the array, raid 1, with one live and one missing disk, then
added the second one later after writing a lot of data.

Also, though probably not the cause, I continued writing data while it
was syncing, and a couple times during the syncing, both drives
stopped responding and I had to power off.

# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5]
[raid4] [raid10]
md127 : active raid1 sdd1[0] sdc1[2]
      1904568184 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]
      bitmap: 3/15 pages [12KB], 65536KB chunk

unused devices: <none>

# mdadm -X /dev/sd[dc]1
        Filename : /dev/sdc1
           Magic : 6d746962
         Version : 4
            UUID : 43761dc5:4383cf0f:41ef2dab:43e6d74e
          Events : 40013
  Events Cleared : 40013
           State : OK
       Chunksize : 64 MB
          Daemon : 5s flush period
      Write Mode : Allow write behind, max 256
       Sync Size : 1904568184 (1816.34 GiB 1950.28 GB)
          Bitmap : 29062 bits (chunks), 3 dirty (0.0%)
        Filename : /dev/sdd1
           Magic : 6d746962
         Version : 4
            UUID : 43761dc5:4383cf0f:41ef2dab:43e6d74e
          Events : 40013
  Events Cleared : 40013
           State : OK
       Chunksize : 64 MB
          Daemon : 5s flush period
      Write Mode : Allow write behind, max 256
       Sync Size : 1904568184 (1816.34 GiB 1950.28 GB)
          Bitmap : 29062 bits (chunks), 3 dirty (0.0%)


Quoting NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>:

> On Thu, October 15, 2009 9:39 am, aristizb@ualberta.ca wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a RAID1 with 2 LVM disks and I am running into a strange
>> situation where having the 2 disks connected to the array the bitmap
>> never clears the dirty chunks.
>
> That shouldn't happen...
> What versions of mdadm and the Linux kernel are you using?
>
> NeilBrown
>
>>
>> I am assuming also that when a RAID1 is in write-through mode, the
>> bitmap  indicates that all the data has made it to all the disks if
>> there are no dirty chunks using mdadm --examine-bitmap.
>>
>> The output of cat /proc/mdstat is:
>>
>> md2060 : active raid1 dm-5[1] dm-6[0]
>>        2252736 blocks [2/2] [UU]
>>        bitmap: 1/275 pages [12KB], 4KB chunk, file: /tmp/md2060bm
>>
>>
>> The output of mdadm --examine-bitmap /tmp/md2060bm is:
>>
>> Filename : md2060bm
>>             Magic : 6d746962
>>           Version : 4
>>              UUID : ad5fb74c:bb1c654a:087b2595:8a5d04a9
>>            Events : 12
>>    Events Cleared : 12
>>             State : OK
>>         Chunksize : 4 KB
>>            Daemon : 5s flush period
>>        Write Mode : Normal
>>         Sync Size : 2252736 (2.15 GiB 2.31 GB)
>>            Bitmap : 563184 bits (chunks), 3 dirty (0.0%)
>>
>>
>> Having the array under no IO, I waited 30 minutes but the dirty data
>> never gets clear from the bitmap, so I presume  the disks are not in
>> sync; but after I ran a block by block comparison of the two devices I
>> found that they are equal.
>>
>> The superblocks and the external bitmap tell me that all the events
>> are cleared, so I am confused on why the bitmap never goes to 0 dirty
>> chunks.
>>
>> How can I tell if the disks are in sync?
>>
>>
>> Thank you in advance for any help

Re: dirty chunks on bitmap not clearing (RAID1)

[NeilBrown]

On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:30:56 -0500 Chris Pearson <kermit4@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have the same problem.  3 chunks are always dirty.
> 
> I'm using 2.6.38-8-generic and mdadm - v3.1.4 - 31st August 2010
> 
> If that's not normal, then maybe what I've done differently is that I
> created the array, raid 1, with one live and one missing disk, then
> added the second one later after writing a lot of data.
> 
> Also, though probably not the cause, I continued writing data while it
> was syncing, and a couple times during the syncing, both drives
> stopped responding and I had to power off.
> 
> # cat /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5]
> [raid4] [raid10]
> md127 : active raid1 sdd1[0] sdc1[2]
>       1904568184 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]
>       bitmap: 3/15 pages [12KB], 65536KB chunk
> 
> unused devices: <none>
> 
> # mdadm -X /dev/sd[dc]1
>         Filename : /dev/sdc1
>            Magic : 6d746962
>          Version : 4
>             UUID : 43761dc5:4383cf0f:41ef2dab:43e6d74e
>           Events : 40013
>   Events Cleared : 40013
>            State : OK
>        Chunksize : 64 MB
>           Daemon : 5s flush period
>       Write Mode : Allow write behind, max 256
>        Sync Size : 1904568184 (1816.34 GiB 1950.28 GB)
>           Bitmap : 29062 bits (chunks), 3 dirty (0.0%)
>         Filename : /dev/sdd1
>            Magic : 6d746962
>          Version : 4
>             UUID : 43761dc5:4383cf0f:41ef2dab:43e6d74e
>           Events : 40013
>   Events Cleared : 40013
>            State : OK
>        Chunksize : 64 MB
>           Daemon : 5s flush period
>       Write Mode : Allow write behind, max 256
>        Sync Size : 1904568184 (1816.34 GiB 1950.28 GB)
>           Bitmap : 29062 bits (chunks), 3 dirty (0.0%)

I cannot see how this would be happening.  If any bits are set, then they
will be cleared after 5 seconds, and then 5 seconds later the block holding
the bits will be written out so that they will appear on disk to be cleared.

I assume that if you write to the array, the 'dirty' count increases, but
always goes back to three?

And if you stop the array and start it again, the '3' stays there?

If I sent you a patch to add some tracing information would you be able to
compile a new kernel with that patch applied and see what it says?

Thanks,

NeilBrown


> 
> 
> Quoting NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>:
> 
> > On Thu, October 15, 2009 9:39 am, aristizb@ualberta.ca wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I have a RAID1 with 2 LVM disks and I am running into a strange
> >> situation where having the 2 disks connected to the array the bitmap
> >> never clears the dirty chunks.
> >
> > That shouldn't happen...
> > What versions of mdadm and the Linux kernel are you using?
> >
> > NeilBrown
> >
> >>
> >> I am assuming also that when a RAID1 is in write-through mode, the
> >> bitmap  indicates that all the data has made it to all the disks if
> >> there are no dirty chunks using mdadm --examine-bitmap.
> >>
> >> The output of cat /proc/mdstat is:
> >>
> >> md2060 : active raid1 dm-5[1] dm-6[0]
> >>        2252736 blocks [2/2] [UU]
> >>        bitmap: 1/275 pages [12KB], 4KB chunk, file: /tmp/md2060bm
> >>
> >>
> >> The output of mdadm --examine-bitmap /tmp/md2060bm is:
> >>
> >> Filename : md2060bm
> >>             Magic : 6d746962
> >>           Version : 4
> >>              UUID : ad5fb74c:bb1c654a:087b2595:8a5d04a9
> >>            Events : 12
> >>    Events Cleared : 12
> >>             State : OK
> >>         Chunksize : 4 KB
> >>            Daemon : 5s flush period
> >>        Write Mode : Normal
> >>         Sync Size : 2252736 (2.15 GiB 2.31 GB)
> >>            Bitmap : 563184 bits (chunks), 3 dirty (0.0%)
> >>
> >>
> >> Having the array under no IO, I waited 30 minutes but the dirty data
> >> never gets clear from the bitmap, so I presume  the disks are not in
> >> sync; but after I ran a block by block comparison of the two devices I
> >> found that they are equal.
> >>
> >> The superblocks and the external bitmap tell me that all the events
> >> are cleared, so I am confused on why the bitmap never goes to 0 dirty
> >> chunks.
> >>
> >> How can I tell if the disks are in sync?
> >>
> >>
> >> Thank you in advance for any help
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: dirty chunks on bitmap not clearing (RAID1)

[Chris Pearson]

I'm happy to apply a patch to whichever kernel you like, but the blocks have since cleared, so I will try and reproduce it first.

On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, NeilBrown wrote:

>Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 17:38:42 +1000
>From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
>To: Chris Pearson <kermit4@gmail.com>
>Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: dirty chunks on bitmap not clearing (RAID1)
>
>On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:30:56 -0500 Chris Pearson <kermit4@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have the same problem.  3 chunks are always dirty.
>> 
>> I'm using 2.6.38-8-generic and mdadm - v3.1.4 - 31st August 2010
>> 
>> If that's not normal, then maybe what I've done differently is that I
>> created the array, raid 1, with one live and one missing disk, then
>> added the second one later after writing a lot of data.
>> 
>> Also, though probably not the cause, I continued writing data while it
>> was syncing, and a couple times during the syncing, both drives
>> stopped responding and I had to power off.
>> 
>> # cat /proc/mdstat
>> Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5]
>> [raid4] [raid10]
>> md127 : active raid1 sdd1[0] sdc1[2]
>>       1904568184 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]
>>       bitmap: 3/15 pages [12KB], 65536KB chunk
>> 
>> unused devices: <none>
>> 
>> # mdadm -X /dev/sd[dc]1
>>         Filename : /dev/sdc1
>>            Magic : 6d746962
>>          Version : 4
>>             UUID : 43761dc5:4383cf0f:41ef2dab:43e6d74e
>>           Events : 40013
>>   Events Cleared : 40013
>>            State : OK
>>        Chunksize : 64 MB
>>           Daemon : 5s flush period
>>       Write Mode : Allow write behind, max 256
>>        Sync Size : 1904568184 (1816.34 GiB 1950.28 GB)
>>           Bitmap : 29062 bits (chunks), 3 dirty (0.0%)
>>         Filename : /dev/sdd1
>>            Magic : 6d746962
>>          Version : 4
>>             UUID : 43761dc5:4383cf0f:41ef2dab:43e6d74e
>>           Events : 40013
>>   Events Cleared : 40013
>>            State : OK
>>        Chunksize : 64 MB
>>           Daemon : 5s flush period
>>       Write Mode : Allow write behind, max 256
>>        Sync Size : 1904568184 (1816.34 GiB 1950.28 GB)
>>           Bitmap : 29062 bits (chunks), 3 dirty (0.0%)
>
>I cannot see how this would be happening.  If any bits are set, then they
>will be cleared after 5 seconds, and then 5 seconds later the block holding
>the bits will be written out so that they will appear on disk to be cleared.
>
>I assume that if you write to the array, the 'dirty' count increases, but
>always goes back to three?
>
>And if you stop the array and start it again, the '3' stays there?
>
>If I sent you a patch to add some tracing information would you be able to
>compile a new kernel with that patch applied and see what it says?
>
>Thanks,
>
>NeilBrown
>
>
>> 
>> 
>> Quoting NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>:
>> 
>> > On Thu, October 15, 2009 9:39 am, aristizb@ualberta.ca wrote:
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> I have a RAID1 with 2 LVM disks and I am running into a strange
>> >> situation where having the 2 disks connected to the array the bitmap
>> >> never clears the dirty chunks.
>> >
>> > That shouldn't happen...
>> > What versions of mdadm and the Linux kernel are you using?
>> >
>> > NeilBrown
>> >
>> >>
>> >> I am assuming also that when a RAID1 is in write-through mode, the
>> >> bitmap  indicates that all the data has made it to all the disks if
>> >> there are no dirty chunks using mdadm --examine-bitmap.
>> >>
>> >> The output of cat /proc/mdstat is:
>> >>
>> >> md2060 : active raid1 dm-5[1] dm-6[0]
>> >>        2252736 blocks [2/2] [UU]
>> >>        bitmap: 1/275 pages [12KB], 4KB chunk, file: /tmp/md2060bm
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> The output of mdadm --examine-bitmap /tmp/md2060bm is:
>> >>
>> >> Filename : md2060bm
>> >>             Magic : 6d746962
>> >>           Version : 4
>> >>              UUID : ad5fb74c:bb1c654a:087b2595:8a5d04a9
>> >>            Events : 12
>> >>    Events Cleared : 12
>> >>             State : OK
>> >>         Chunksize : 4 KB
>> >>            Daemon : 5s flush period
>> >>        Write Mode : Normal
>> >>         Sync Size : 2252736 (2.15 GiB 2.31 GB)
>> >>            Bitmap : 563184 bits (chunks), 3 dirty (0.0%)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Having the array under no IO, I waited 30 minutes but the dirty data
>> >> never gets clear from the bitmap, so I presume  the disks are not in
>> >> sync; but after I ran a block by block comparison of the two devices I
>> >> found that they are equal.
>> >>
>> >> The superblocks and the external bitmap tell me that all the events
>> >> are cleared, so I am confused on why the bitmap never goes to 0 dirty
>> >> chunks.
>> >>
>> >> How can I tell if the disks are in sync?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thank you in advance for any help
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>

Re: dirty chunks on bitmap not clearing (RAID1)

[NeilBrown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8104 bytes --]

On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:23:01 -0500 (CDT) Chris Pearson
<pearson.christopher.j@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm happy to apply a patch to whichever kernel you like, but the blocks have since cleared, so I will try and reproduce it first.

I have finally identified the problem here.  I was looking into a different
but related problem and saw what was happening.  I don't know what I didn't
notice it before.

You can easily reproduce the problem by writing to an array with a bitmap
while a spare is recovering. Any bits that get set in the section that has
already been recovered will stay set.

This patch fixes it and will - with luck - be in 3.2.

Thanks,
NeilBrown

From b9664495d2a884fbf7195e1abe4778cc6c3ae9b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 09:42:52 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] md/bitmap: It is OK to clear bits during recovery.

commit d0a4bb492772ce5c4bdfba3744a99ed6f6fb238f introduced a
regression which is annoying but fairly harmless.

When writing to an array that is undergoing recovery (a spare
in being integrated into the array), writing to the array will
set bits in the bitmap, but they will not be cleared when the
write completes.

For bits covering areas that have not been recovered yet this is not a
problem as the recovery will clear the bits.  However bits set in
already-recovered region will stay set and never be cleared.
This doesn't risk data integrity.  The only negatives are:
 - next time there is a crash, more resyncing than necessary will
   be done.
 - the bitmap doesn't look clean, which is confusing.

While an array is recovering we don't want to update the
'events_cleared' setting in the bitmap but we do still want to clear
bits that have very recently been set - providing they were written to
the recovering device.

So split those two needs - which previously both depended on 'success'
and always clear the bit of the write went to all devices.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

diff --git a/drivers/md/bitmap.c b/drivers/md/bitmap.c
index b690711..6d03774 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bitmap.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bitmap.c
@@ -1393,9 +1393,6 @@ void bitmap_endwrite(struct bitmap *bitmap, sector_t offset, unsigned long secto
 			 atomic_read(&bitmap->behind_writes),
 			 bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.max_write_behind);
 	}
-	if (bitmap->mddev->degraded)
-		/* Never clear bits or update events_cleared when degraded */
-		success = 0;
 
 	while (sectors) {
 		sector_t blocks;
@@ -1409,7 +1406,7 @@ void bitmap_endwrite(struct bitmap *bitmap, sector_t offset, unsigned long secto
 			return;
 		}
 
-		if (success &&
+		if (success && !bitmap->mddev->degraded &&
 		    bitmap->events_cleared < bitmap->mddev->events) {
 			bitmap->events_cleared = bitmap->mddev->events;
 			bitmap->need_sync = 1;



> 
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, NeilBrown wrote:
> 
> >Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 17:38:42 +1000
> >From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> >To: Chris Pearson <kermit4@gmail.com>
> >Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
> >Subject: Re: dirty chunks on bitmap not clearing (RAID1)
> >
> >On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:30:56 -0500 Chris Pearson <kermit4@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I have the same problem.  3 chunks are always dirty.
> >> 
> >> I'm using 2.6.38-8-generic and mdadm - v3.1.4 - 31st August 2010
> >> 
> >> If that's not normal, then maybe what I've done differently is that I
> >> created the array, raid 1, with one live and one missing disk, then
> >> added the second one later after writing a lot of data.
> >> 
> >> Also, though probably not the cause, I continued writing data while it
> >> was syncing, and a couple times during the syncing, both drives
> >> stopped responding and I had to power off.
> >> 
> >> # cat /proc/mdstat
> >> Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5]
> >> [raid4] [raid10]
> >> md127 : active raid1 sdd1[0] sdc1[2]
> >>       1904568184 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]
> >>       bitmap: 3/15 pages [12KB], 65536KB chunk
> >> 
> >> unused devices: <none>
> >> 
> >> # mdadm -X /dev/sd[dc]1
> >>         Filename : /dev/sdc1
> >>            Magic : 6d746962
> >>          Version : 4
> >>             UUID : 43761dc5:4383cf0f:41ef2dab:43e6d74e
> >>           Events : 40013
> >>   Events Cleared : 40013
> >>            State : OK
> >>        Chunksize : 64 MB
> >>           Daemon : 5s flush period
> >>       Write Mode : Allow write behind, max 256
> >>        Sync Size : 1904568184 (1816.34 GiB 1950.28 GB)
> >>           Bitmap : 29062 bits (chunks), 3 dirty (0.0%)
> >>         Filename : /dev/sdd1
> >>            Magic : 6d746962
> >>          Version : 4
> >>             UUID : 43761dc5:4383cf0f:41ef2dab:43e6d74e
> >>           Events : 40013
> >>   Events Cleared : 40013
> >>            State : OK
> >>        Chunksize : 64 MB
> >>           Daemon : 5s flush period
> >>       Write Mode : Allow write behind, max 256
> >>        Sync Size : 1904568184 (1816.34 GiB 1950.28 GB)
> >>           Bitmap : 29062 bits (chunks), 3 dirty (0.0%)
> >
> >I cannot see how this would be happening.  If any bits are set, then they
> >will be cleared after 5 seconds, and then 5 seconds later the block holding
> >the bits will be written out so that they will appear on disk to be cleared.
> >
> >I assume that if you write to the array, the 'dirty' count increases, but
> >always goes back to three?
> >
> >And if you stop the array and start it again, the '3' stays there?
> >
> >If I sent you a patch to add some tracing information would you be able to
> >compile a new kernel with that patch applied and see what it says?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >NeilBrown
> >
> >
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Quoting NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>:
> >> 
> >> > On Thu, October 15, 2009 9:39 am, aristizb@ualberta.ca wrote:
> >> >> Hello,
> >> >>
> >> >> I have a RAID1 with 2 LVM disks and I am running into a strange
> >> >> situation where having the 2 disks connected to the array the bitmap
> >> >> never clears the dirty chunks.
> >> >
> >> > That shouldn't happen...
> >> > What versions of mdadm and the Linux kernel are you using?
> >> >
> >> > NeilBrown
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> I am assuming also that when a RAID1 is in write-through mode, the
> >> >> bitmap  indicates that all the data has made it to all the disks if
> >> >> there are no dirty chunks using mdadm --examine-bitmap.
> >> >>
> >> >> The output of cat /proc/mdstat is:
> >> >>
> >> >> md2060 : active raid1 dm-5[1] dm-6[0]
> >> >>        2252736 blocks [2/2] [UU]
> >> >>        bitmap: 1/275 pages [12KB], 4KB chunk, file: /tmp/md2060bm
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> The output of mdadm --examine-bitmap /tmp/md2060bm is:
> >> >>
> >> >> Filename : md2060bm
> >> >>             Magic : 6d746962
> >> >>           Version : 4
> >> >>              UUID : ad5fb74c:bb1c654a:087b2595:8a5d04a9
> >> >>            Events : 12
> >> >>    Events Cleared : 12
> >> >>             State : OK
> >> >>         Chunksize : 4 KB
> >> >>            Daemon : 5s flush period
> >> >>        Write Mode : Normal
> >> >>         Sync Size : 2252736 (2.15 GiB 2.31 GB)
> >> >>            Bitmap : 563184 bits (chunks), 3 dirty (0.0%)
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Having the array under no IO, I waited 30 minutes but the dirty data
> >> >> never gets clear from the bitmap, so I presume  the disks are not in
> >> >> sync; but after I ran a block by block comparison of the two devices I
> >> >> found that they are equal.
> >> >>
> >> >> The superblocks and the external bitmap tell me that all the events
> >> >> are cleared, so I am confused on why the bitmap never goes to 0 dirty
> >> >> chunks.
> >> >>
> >> >> How can I tell if the disks are in sync?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Thank you in advance for any help
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> >


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

Re: dirty chunks on bitmap not clearing (RAID1)

[Alexander Lyakas]

Hello Neil,

from the patch it looks like for raid levels with more than a single
redundancy, like 3-way raid1 or raid6, when there is an additional
missing drive, the bits will still not be cleared, correct?
This seems to be protected by !bitmap->mddev->degraded part. Because
these bits are still needed to rebuild future drive(s)?

Thanks,
  Alex.


On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:48 AM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:23:01 -0500 (CDT) Chris Pearson
> <pearson.christopher.j@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm happy to apply a patch to whichever kernel you like, but the blocks have since cleared, so I will try and reproduce it first.
>
> I have finally identified the problem here.  I was looking into a different
> but related problem and saw what was happening.  I don't know what I didn't
> notice it before.
>
> You can easily reproduce the problem by writing to an array with a bitmap
> while a spare is recovering. Any bits that get set in the section that has
> already been recovered will stay set.
>
> This patch fixes it and will - with luck - be in 3.2.
>
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
>
> From b9664495d2a884fbf7195e1abe4778cc6c3ae9b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 09:42:52 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] md/bitmap: It is OK to clear bits during recovery.
>
> commit d0a4bb492772ce5c4bdfba3744a99ed6f6fb238f introduced a
> regression which is annoying but fairly harmless.
>
> When writing to an array that is undergoing recovery (a spare
> in being integrated into the array), writing to the array will
> set bits in the bitmap, but they will not be cleared when the
> write completes.
>
> For bits covering areas that have not been recovered yet this is not a
> problem as the recovery will clear the bits.  However bits set in
> already-recovered region will stay set and never be cleared.
> This doesn't risk data integrity.  The only negatives are:
>  - next time there is a crash, more resyncing than necessary will
>   be done.
>  - the bitmap doesn't look clean, which is confusing.
>
> While an array is recovering we don't want to update the
> 'events_cleared' setting in the bitmap but we do still want to clear
> bits that have very recently been set - providing they were written to
> the recovering device.
>
> So split those two needs - which previously both depended on 'success'
> and always clear the bit of the write went to all devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bitmap.c b/drivers/md/bitmap.c
> index b690711..6d03774 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bitmap.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bitmap.c
> @@ -1393,9 +1393,6 @@ void bitmap_endwrite(struct bitmap *bitmap, sector_t offset, unsigned long secto
>                         atomic_read(&bitmap->behind_writes),
>                         bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.max_write_behind);
>        }
> -       if (bitmap->mddev->degraded)
> -               /* Never clear bits or update events_cleared when degraded */
> -               success = 0;
>
>        while (sectors) {
>                sector_t blocks;
> @@ -1409,7 +1406,7 @@ void bitmap_endwrite(struct bitmap *bitmap, sector_t offset, unsigned long secto
>                        return;
>                }
>
> -               if (success &&
> +               if (success && !bitmap->mddev->degraded &&
>                    bitmap->events_cleared < bitmap->mddev->events) {
>                        bitmap->events_cleared = bitmap->mddev->events;
>                        bitmap->need_sync = 1;
>
>
>
>>
>> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, NeilBrown wrote:
>>
>> >Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 17:38:42 +1000
>> >From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
>> >To: Chris Pearson <kermit4@gmail.com>
>> >Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
>> >Subject: Re: dirty chunks on bitmap not clearing (RAID1)
>> >
>> >On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:30:56 -0500 Chris Pearson <kermit4@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I have the same problem.  3 chunks are always dirty.
>> >>
>> >> I'm using 2.6.38-8-generic and mdadm - v3.1.4 - 31st August 2010
>> >>
>> >> If that's not normal, then maybe what I've done differently is that I
>> >> created the array, raid 1, with one live and one missing disk, then
>> >> added the second one later after writing a lot of data.
>> >>
>> >> Also, though probably not the cause, I continued writing data while it
>> >> was syncing, and a couple times during the syncing, both drives
>> >> stopped responding and I had to power off.
>> >>
>> >> # cat /proc/mdstat
>> >> Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5]
>> >> [raid4] [raid10]
>> >> md127 : active raid1 sdd1[0] sdc1[2]
>> >>       1904568184 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]
>> >>       bitmap: 3/15 pages [12KB], 65536KB chunk
>> >>
>> >> unused devices: <none>
>> >>
>> >> # mdadm -X /dev/sd[dc]1
>> >>         Filename : /dev/sdc1
>> >>            Magic : 6d746962
>> >>          Version : 4
>> >>             UUID : 43761dc5:4383cf0f:41ef2dab:43e6d74e
>> >>           Events : 40013
>> >>   Events Cleared : 40013
>> >>            State : OK
>> >>        Chunksize : 64 MB
>> >>           Daemon : 5s flush period
>> >>       Write Mode : Allow write behind, max 256
>> >>        Sync Size : 1904568184 (1816.34 GiB 1950.28 GB)
>> >>           Bitmap : 29062 bits (chunks), 3 dirty (0.0%)
>> >>         Filename : /dev/sdd1
>> >>            Magic : 6d746962
>> >>          Version : 4
>> >>             UUID : 43761dc5:4383cf0f:41ef2dab:43e6d74e
>> >>           Events : 40013
>> >>   Events Cleared : 40013
>> >>            State : OK
>> >>        Chunksize : 64 MB
>> >>           Daemon : 5s flush period
>> >>       Write Mode : Allow write behind, max 256
>> >>        Sync Size : 1904568184 (1816.34 GiB 1950.28 GB)
>> >>           Bitmap : 29062 bits (chunks), 3 dirty (0.0%)
>> >
>> >I cannot see how this would be happening.  If any bits are set, then they
>> >will be cleared after 5 seconds, and then 5 seconds later the block holding
>> >the bits will be written out so that they will appear on disk to be cleared.
>> >
>> >I assume that if you write to the array, the 'dirty' count increases, but
>> >always goes back to three?
>> >
>> >And if you stop the array and start it again, the '3' stays there?
>> >
>> >If I sent you a patch to add some tracing information would you be able to
>> >compile a new kernel with that patch applied and see what it says?
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >
>> >NeilBrown
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Quoting NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>:
>> >>
>> >> > On Thu, October 15, 2009 9:39 am, aristizb@ualberta.ca wrote:
>> >> >> Hello,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I have a RAID1 with 2 LVM disks and I am running into a strange
>> >> >> situation where having the 2 disks connected to the array the bitmap
>> >> >> never clears the dirty chunks.
>> >> >
>> >> > That shouldn't happen...
>> >> > What versions of mdadm and the Linux kernel are you using?
>> >> >
>> >> > NeilBrown
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I am assuming also that when a RAID1 is in write-through mode, the
>> >> >> bitmap  indicates that all the data has made it to all the disks if
>> >> >> there are no dirty chunks using mdadm --examine-bitmap.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The output of cat /proc/mdstat is:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> md2060 : active raid1 dm-5[1] dm-6[0]
>> >> >>        2252736 blocks [2/2] [UU]
>> >> >>        bitmap: 1/275 pages [12KB], 4KB chunk, file: /tmp/md2060bm
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The output of mdadm --examine-bitmap /tmp/md2060bm is:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Filename : md2060bm
>> >> >>             Magic : 6d746962
>> >> >>           Version : 4
>> >> >>              UUID : ad5fb74c:bb1c654a:087b2595:8a5d04a9
>> >> >>            Events : 12
>> >> >>    Events Cleared : 12
>> >> >>             State : OK
>> >> >>         Chunksize : 4 KB
>> >> >>            Daemon : 5s flush period
>> >> >>        Write Mode : Normal
>> >> >>         Sync Size : 2252736 (2.15 GiB 2.31 GB)
>> >> >>            Bitmap : 563184 bits (chunks), 3 dirty (0.0%)
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Having the array under no IO, I waited 30 minutes but the dirty data
>> >> >> never gets clear from the bitmap, so I presume  the disks are not in
>> >> >> sync; but after I ran a block by block comparison of the two devices I
>> >> >> found that they are equal.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The superblocks and the external bitmap tell me that all the events
>> >> >> are cleared, so I am confused on why the bitmap never goes to 0 dirty
>> >> >> chunks.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> How can I tell if the disks are in sync?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thank you in advance for any help
>> >> --
>> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> >
>> >
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: dirty chunks on bitmap not clearing (RAID1)

[NeilBrown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10122 bytes --]

On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 20:07:16 +0200 Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello Neil,
> 
> from the patch it looks like for raid levels with more than a single
> redundancy, like 3-way raid1 or raid6, when there is an additional
> missing drive, the bits will still not be cleared, correct?

Correct.  This is by design.


> This seems to be protected by !bitmap->mddev->degraded part. Because
> these bits are still needed to rebuild future drive(s)?

Exactly.

NeilBrown


> 
> Thanks,
>   Alex.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:48 AM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:23:01 -0500 (CDT) Chris Pearson
> > <pearson.christopher.j@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm happy to apply a patch to whichever kernel you like, but the blocks have since cleared, so I will try and reproduce it first.
> >
> > I have finally identified the problem here.  I was looking into a different
> > but related problem and saw what was happening.  I don't know what I didn't
> > notice it before.
> >
> > You can easily reproduce the problem by writing to an array with a bitmap
> > while a spare is recovering. Any bits that get set in the section that has
> > already been recovered will stay set.
> >
> > This patch fixes it and will - with luck - be in 3.2.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > NeilBrown
> >
> > From b9664495d2a884fbf7195e1abe4778cc6c3ae9b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> > Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 09:42:52 +1100
> > Subject: [PATCH] md/bitmap: It is OK to clear bits during recovery.
> >
> > commit d0a4bb492772ce5c4bdfba3744a99ed6f6fb238f introduced a
> > regression which is annoying but fairly harmless.
> >
> > When writing to an array that is undergoing recovery (a spare
> > in being integrated into the array), writing to the array will
> > set bits in the bitmap, but they will not be cleared when the
> > write completes.
> >
> > For bits covering areas that have not been recovered yet this is not a
> > problem as the recovery will clear the bits.  However bits set in
> > already-recovered region will stay set and never be cleared.
> > This doesn't risk data integrity.  The only negatives are:
> >  - next time there is a crash, more resyncing than necessary will
> >   be done.
> >  - the bitmap doesn't look clean, which is confusing.
> >
> > While an array is recovering we don't want to update the
> > 'events_cleared' setting in the bitmap but we do still want to clear
> > bits that have very recently been set - providing they were written to
> > the recovering device.
> >
> > So split those two needs - which previously both depended on 'success'
> > and always clear the bit of the write went to all devices.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/bitmap.c b/drivers/md/bitmap.c
> > index b690711..6d03774 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/bitmap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/bitmap.c
> > @@ -1393,9 +1393,6 @@ void bitmap_endwrite(struct bitmap *bitmap, sector_t offset, unsigned long secto
> >                         atomic_read(&bitmap->behind_writes),
> >                         bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.max_write_behind);
> >        }
> > -       if (bitmap->mddev->degraded)
> > -               /* Never clear bits or update events_cleared when degraded */
> > -               success = 0;
> >
> >        while (sectors) {
> >                sector_t blocks;
> > @@ -1409,7 +1406,7 @@ void bitmap_endwrite(struct bitmap *bitmap, sector_t offset, unsigned long secto
> >                        return;
> >                }
> >
> > -               if (success &&
> > +               if (success && !bitmap->mddev->degraded &&
> >                    bitmap->events_cleared < bitmap->mddev->events) {
> >                        bitmap->events_cleared = bitmap->mddev->events;
> >                        bitmap->need_sync = 1;
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, NeilBrown wrote:
> >>
> >> >Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 17:38:42 +1000
> >> >From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> >> >To: Chris Pearson <kermit4@gmail.com>
> >> >Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
> >> >Subject: Re: dirty chunks on bitmap not clearing (RAID1)
> >> >
> >> >On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:30:56 -0500 Chris Pearson <kermit4@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I have the same problem.  3 chunks are always dirty.
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm using 2.6.38-8-generic and mdadm - v3.1.4 - 31st August 2010
> >> >>
> >> >> If that's not normal, then maybe what I've done differently is that I
> >> >> created the array, raid 1, with one live and one missing disk, then
> >> >> added the second one later after writing a lot of data.
> >> >>
> >> >> Also, though probably not the cause, I continued writing data while it
> >> >> was syncing, and a couple times during the syncing, both drives
> >> >> stopped responding and I had to power off.
> >> >>
> >> >> # cat /proc/mdstat
> >> >> Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5]
> >> >> [raid4] [raid10]
> >> >> md127 : active raid1 sdd1[0] sdc1[2]
> >> >>       1904568184 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]
> >> >>       bitmap: 3/15 pages [12KB], 65536KB chunk
> >> >>
> >> >> unused devices: <none>
> >> >>
> >> >> # mdadm -X /dev/sd[dc]1
> >> >>         Filename : /dev/sdc1
> >> >>            Magic : 6d746962
> >> >>          Version : 4
> >> >>             UUID : 43761dc5:4383cf0f:41ef2dab:43e6d74e
> >> >>           Events : 40013
> >> >>   Events Cleared : 40013
> >> >>            State : OK
> >> >>        Chunksize : 64 MB
> >> >>           Daemon : 5s flush period
> >> >>       Write Mode : Allow write behind, max 256
> >> >>        Sync Size : 1904568184 (1816.34 GiB 1950.28 GB)
> >> >>           Bitmap : 29062 bits (chunks), 3 dirty (0.0%)
> >> >>         Filename : /dev/sdd1
> >> >>            Magic : 6d746962
> >> >>          Version : 4
> >> >>             UUID : 43761dc5:4383cf0f:41ef2dab:43e6d74e
> >> >>           Events : 40013
> >> >>   Events Cleared : 40013
> >> >>            State : OK
> >> >>        Chunksize : 64 MB
> >> >>           Daemon : 5s flush period
> >> >>       Write Mode : Allow write behind, max 256
> >> >>        Sync Size : 1904568184 (1816.34 GiB 1950.28 GB)
> >> >>           Bitmap : 29062 bits (chunks), 3 dirty (0.0%)
> >> >
> >> >I cannot see how this would be happening.  If any bits are set, then they
> >> >will be cleared after 5 seconds, and then 5 seconds later the block holding
> >> >the bits will be written out so that they will appear on disk to be cleared.
> >> >
> >> >I assume that if you write to the array, the 'dirty' count increases, but
> >> >always goes back to three?
> >> >
> >> >And if you stop the array and start it again, the '3' stays there?
> >> >
> >> >If I sent you a patch to add some tracing information would you be able to
> >> >compile a new kernel with that patch applied and see what it says?
> >> >
> >> >Thanks,
> >> >
> >> >NeilBrown
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Quoting NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>:
> >> >>
> >> >> > On Thu, October 15, 2009 9:39 am, aristizb@ualberta.ca wrote:
> >> >> >> Hello,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I have a RAID1 with 2 LVM disks and I am running into a strange
> >> >> >> situation where having the 2 disks connected to the array the bitmap
> >> >> >> never clears the dirty chunks.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > That shouldn't happen...
> >> >> > What versions of mdadm and the Linux kernel are you using?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > NeilBrown
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I am assuming also that when a RAID1 is in write-through mode, the
> >> >> >> bitmap  indicates that all the data has made it to all the disks if
> >> >> >> there are no dirty chunks using mdadm --examine-bitmap.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The output of cat /proc/mdstat is:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> md2060 : active raid1 dm-5[1] dm-6[0]
> >> >> >>        2252736 blocks [2/2] [UU]
> >> >> >>        bitmap: 1/275 pages [12KB], 4KB chunk, file: /tmp/md2060bm
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The output of mdadm --examine-bitmap /tmp/md2060bm is:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Filename : md2060bm
> >> >> >>             Magic : 6d746962
> >> >> >>           Version : 4
> >> >> >>              UUID : ad5fb74c:bb1c654a:087b2595:8a5d04a9
> >> >> >>            Events : 12
> >> >> >>    Events Cleared : 12
> >> >> >>             State : OK
> >> >> >>         Chunksize : 4 KB
> >> >> >>            Daemon : 5s flush period
> >> >> >>        Write Mode : Normal
> >> >> >>         Sync Size : 2252736 (2.15 GiB 2.31 GB)
> >> >> >>            Bitmap : 563184 bits (chunks), 3 dirty (0.0%)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Having the array under no IO, I waited 30 minutes but the dirty data
> >> >> >> never gets clear from the bitmap, so I presume  the disks are not in
> >> >> >> sync; but after I ran a block by block comparison of the two devices I
> >> >> >> found that they are equal.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The superblocks and the external bitmap tell me that all the events
> >> >> >> are cleared, so I am confused on why the bitmap never goes to 0 dirty
> >> >> >> chunks.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> How can I tell if the disks are in sync?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Thank you in advance for any help
> >> >> --
> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> >> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >> >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

dirty chunks on bitmap not clearing (RAID1)

[aristizb]

Hello,

I have a RAID1 with 2 LVM disks and I am running into a strange  
situation where having the 2 disks connected to the array the bitmap  
never clears the dirty chunks.

I am assuming also that when a RAID1 is in write-through mode, the  
bitmap  indicates that all the data has made it to all the disks if  
there are no dirty chunks using mdadm --examine-bitmap.

The output of cat /proc/mdstat is:

md2060 : active raid1 dm-5[1] dm-6[0]
       2252736 blocks [2/2] [UU]
       bitmap: 1/275 pages [12KB], 4KB chunk, file: /tmp/md2060bm


The output of mdadm --examine-bitmap /tmp/md2060bm is:

Filename : md2060bm
            Magic : 6d746962
          Version : 4
             UUID : ad5fb74c:bb1c654a:087b2595:8a5d04a9
           Events : 12
   Events Cleared : 12
            State : OK
        Chunksize : 4 KB
           Daemon : 5s flush period
       Write Mode : Normal
        Sync Size : 2252736 (2.15 GiB 2.31 GB)
           Bitmap : 563184 bits (chunks), 3 dirty (0.0%)


Having the array under no IO, I waited 30 minutes but the dirty data  
never gets clear from the bitmap, so I presume  the disks are not in  
sync; but after I ran a block by block comparison of the two devices I  
found that they are equal.

The superblocks and the external bitmap tell me that all the events  
are cleared, so I am confused on why the bitmap never goes to 0 dirty  
chunks.

How can I tell if the disks are in sync?


Thank you in advance for any help.


-- 
Juan Aristizabal

Re: dirty chunks on bitmap not clearing (RAID1)

[NeilBrown]

On Thu, October 15, 2009 9:39 am, aristizb@ualberta.ca wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a RAID1 with 2 LVM disks and I am running into a strange
> situation where having the 2 disks connected to the array the bitmap
> never clears the dirty chunks.

That shouldn't happen...
What versions of mdadm and the Linux kernel are you using?

NeilBrown

>
> I am assuming also that when a RAID1 is in write-through mode, the
> bitmap  indicates that all the data has made it to all the disks if
> there are no dirty chunks using mdadm --examine-bitmap.
>
> The output of cat /proc/mdstat is:
>
> md2060 : active raid1 dm-5[1] dm-6[0]
>        2252736 blocks [2/2] [UU]
>        bitmap: 1/275 pages [12KB], 4KB chunk, file: /tmp/md2060bm
>
>
> The output of mdadm --examine-bitmap /tmp/md2060bm is:
>
> Filename : md2060bm
>             Magic : 6d746962
>           Version : 4
>              UUID : ad5fb74c:bb1c654a:087b2595:8a5d04a9
>            Events : 12
>    Events Cleared : 12
>             State : OK
>         Chunksize : 4 KB
>            Daemon : 5s flush period
>        Write Mode : Normal
>         Sync Size : 2252736 (2.15 GiB 2.31 GB)
>            Bitmap : 563184 bits (chunks), 3 dirty (0.0%)
>
>
> Having the array under no IO, I waited 30 minutes but the dirty data
> never gets clear from the bitmap, so I presume  the disks are not in
> sync; but after I ran a block by block comparison of the two devices I
> found that they are equal.
>
> The superblocks and the external bitmap tell me that all the events
> are cleared, so I am confused on why the bitmap never goes to 0 dirty
> chunks.
>
> How can I tell if the disks are in sync?
>
>
> Thank you in advance for any help.
>
>
> --
> Juan Aristizabal
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

Re: dirty chunks on bitmap not clearing (RAID1)

[aristizb]

Hi Neil.

I am using mdadm 2.6.3 and the kernel is Ubuntu 2.6.24-24.


Quoting NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>:

> On Thu, October 15, 2009 9:39 am, aristizb@ualberta.ca wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a RAID1 with 2 LVM disks and I am running into a strange
>> situation where having the 2 disks connected to the array the bitmap
>> never clears the dirty chunks.
>
> That shouldn't happen...
> What versions of mdadm and the Linux kernel are you using?
>
> NeilBrown
>
>>
>> I am assuming also that when a RAID1 is in write-through mode, the
>> bitmap  indicates that all the data has made it to all the disks if
>> there are no dirty chunks using mdadm --examine-bitmap.
>>
>> The output of cat /proc/mdstat is:
>>
>> md2060 : active raid1 dm-5[1] dm-6[0]
>>        2252736 blocks [2/2] [UU]
>>        bitmap: 1/275 pages [12KB], 4KB chunk, file: /tmp/md2060bm
>>
>>
>> The output of mdadm --examine-bitmap /tmp/md2060bm is:
>>
>> Filename : md2060bm
>>             Magic : 6d746962
>>           Version : 4
>>              UUID : ad5fb74c:bb1c654a:087b2595:8a5d04a9
>>            Events : 12
>>    Events Cleared : 12
>>             State : OK
>>         Chunksize : 4 KB
>>            Daemon : 5s flush period
>>        Write Mode : Normal
>>         Sync Size : 2252736 (2.15 GiB 2.31 GB)
>>            Bitmap : 563184 bits (chunks), 3 dirty (0.0%)
>>
>>
>> Having the array under no IO, I waited 30 minutes but the dirty data
>> never gets clear from the bitmap, so I presume  the disks are not in
>> sync; but after I ran a block by block comparison of the two devices I
>> found that they are equal.
>>
>> The superblocks and the external bitmap tell me that all the events
>> are cleared, so I am confused on why the bitmap never goes to 0 dirty
>> chunks.
>>
>> How can I tell if the disks are in sync?
>>
>>
>> Thank you in advance for any help.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Juan Aristizabal
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
>