linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex <creamyfish@gmail.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is this enough for us to have triple-parity RAID?
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:32:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMqP1GXaqtxrSviV1ZhBXopt82ZprjzPFppXvLK36yLkptmXQw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <067e21e2-6f21-48a7-93a8-bb2249534155@email.android.com>

I understand we need a generator to facilitate a 255 data disks array, but 255
sounds like a theoretic limit to me. ZFS now only supports an array of only 9
disks(6 of them are data disks), so having, say, a quad-parity array
of 48 disks(theoretically)
doesn't sound that bad, does it?

Cheers,
Alex

On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:00 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> Being a generator is a requirement for that.
>
> Alex <creamyfish@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>I think when David says 'generator', he doesn't mean the generator of
>>the order
>>8 Galois field, he means an arbitrary set  of number in it which can
>>render the
>>system of equations solvable to up to a certain number of data
>>disks(not necessarily
>>255). He uses a brute-force method with the help of a Python program to
>>actually
>>figure that out. It looks pretty cool to me since I have known the
>>system of 4 equations
>>generally fails to render a solution for a while, but now I know
>>exactly how many ways
>>it may fail...
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Alex
>>
>>
>>On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 2:16 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>>> On 04/17/2012 01:18 PM, David Brown wrote:
>>>>
>>>> For quad parity, we can try g3 = 8 as the obvious next choice in the
>>>> pattern.  Unfortunately, we start hitting conflicts.  To recover
>>missing
>>>> data, we have to solve multiple simultaneous equations over G(2⁸),
>>whose
>>>> coefficients depend on the index numbers of the missing disks.  With
>>>> parity generators (1, 2, 4, 8), some of these combinations of
>>missing
>>>> disk indexes lead to insoluble equations when you have more that 21
>>disks.
>>>>
>>>
>>> That is because 255 = 3*5*17... this means {02}^3 = {08} is not a
>>generator.
>>>
>>>        -hpa
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid"
>>in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> --
> Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-20  3:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-17  6:11 Is this enough for us to have triple-parity RAID? Alex
2012-04-17  7:58 ` David Brown
2012-04-17 16:37   ` Stefan /*St0fF*/ Hübner
2012-04-18 14:15     ` Alex
2012-04-18 14:11       ` David Brown
2012-04-17 17:16   ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2012-04-17 20:18     ` David Brown
2012-04-17 20:54       ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2012-04-18 18:22       ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2012-04-18 20:20         ` David Brown
2012-04-18 20:39           ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2012-04-19 18:16       ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-20  2:27         ` Alex
2012-04-20  3:00           ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-20  3:32             ` Alex [this message]
2012-04-20 18:58               ` David Brown
2012-04-20 19:39                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-20 21:04                   ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2012-04-20 21:01                 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2012-04-20 21:29                   ` Peter Grandi
2012-04-20 22:31                     ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2012-04-21  9:51                       ` Peter Grandi
2012-04-21 11:18                         ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2012-04-22  3:14                           ` Alex
2012-04-22  8:57                             ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2012-04-20  7:45 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-23 15:26   ` Alex
2012-04-25  1:20     ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-25  2:45       ` Alex
2012-04-25 16:59         ` Emmanuel Noobadmin
2012-04-25 19:29           ` David Brown
2012-04-26  2:30           ` Alex
2012-04-27 15:15             ` Emmanuel Noobadmin
2012-05-01 16:38               ` Alex
2012-04-26  4:24           ` Alex

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMqP1GXaqtxrSviV1ZhBXopt82ZprjzPFppXvLK36yLkptmXQw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=creamyfish@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).