From: Steve Bergman <sbergman27@gmail.com>
To: Linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Is this expected RAID10 performance?
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 06:25:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAO9HMNG2M7KDke3A0c06G47kvVWgssu7ur47BN=0goc2ELDhKQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130607165236.60ac7451@natsu>
I don't have the source link handy, but it was an industry white
paper. (I doubt you'll get it changed.)
There does seem to be some interface limitation here. Running "dd
if=/dev/sdX of=/dev/null bs=512k" simultaneously for various
combinations of drives gives me:
Port A alone : 155MByte/s
Ports A & B : 105MByte/s per drive
Ports A, B & C: 105MBytes/s per drive for A & B. 155MBytess's for C.
Ports A, B, C & D: 105MBytes/s per drive
So there's an aggregate limitation of ~1.7Gbit/s per port pair, with
A&B and C&D making up the pairs.
More information on the interfaces:
From lshw:
description: IDE interface
product: 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset 4 port SATA IDE Controller
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 1f.2
bus info: pci@0000:00:1f.2
logical name: scsi0
logical name: scsi1
version: 05
width: 32 bits
clock: 66MHz
capabilities: ide pm bus_master cap_list emulated
configuration: driver=ata_piix latency=0
resources: irq:20 ioport:dca0(size=8) ioport:dc90(size=4)
ioport:dca8(size=8) ioport:dc94(size=4) ioport:dcc0(size=16)
ioport:dcd0(size=16)
From dmesg:
ata1.00: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
ata1.01: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
ata2.00: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
ata2.01: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
From lspci:
IDE interface: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset 4 port
SATA IDE Controller (rev 05) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP PriO])
Subsystem: Dell Device 02a4
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort-
<TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
Latency: 0
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 20
Region 0: I/O ports at dca0 [size=8]
Region 1: I/O ports at dc90 [size=4]
Region 2: I/O ports at dca8 [size=8]
Region 3: I/O ports at dc94 [size=4]
Region 4: I/O ports at dcc0 [size=16]
Region 5: I/O ports at dcd0 [size=16]
Capabilities: [70] Power Management version 3
Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
Status: D0 NoSoftRst+ PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
Capabilities: [b0] PCI Advanced Features
AFCap: TP+ FLR+
AFCtrl: FLR-
AFStatus: TP-
Kernel driver in use: ata_piix
Kernel modules: ata_generic, pata_acpi, ata_piix
-Steve Bergman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-07 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-06 23:52 Is this expected RAID10 performance? Steve Bergman
2013-06-07 3:25 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-06-07 7:51 ` Roger Heflin
2013-06-07 8:07 ` Alexander Zvyagin
2013-06-07 10:44 ` Steve Bergman
2013-06-07 10:52 ` Roman Mamedov
2013-06-07 11:25 ` Steve Bergman [this message]
2013-06-07 13:18 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-06-07 13:54 ` Steve Bergman
2013-06-07 21:43 ` Bill Davidsen
2013-06-07 23:33 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-06-07 12:39 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-06-07 12:59 ` Steve Bergman
2013-06-07 20:51 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-06-08 18:23 ` keld
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-06-08 19:56 Steve Bergman
2013-06-09 3:08 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-06-09 12:09 ` Ric Wheeler
2013-06-09 20:06 ` Steve Bergman
2013-06-09 21:40 ` Ric Wheeler
2013-06-09 23:08 ` Steve Bergman
2013-06-10 8:35 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-06-10 0:11 ` Joe Landman
2013-06-09 22:05 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-06-09 23:34 ` Steve Bergman
2013-06-10 0:02 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-06-10 2:37 ` Steve Bergman
2013-06-10 10:00 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-06-10 7:19 ` David Brown
2013-06-10 0:05 ` Joe Landman
2013-06-09 23:53 Steve Bergman
2013-06-10 9:23 ` Stan Hoeppner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAO9HMNG2M7KDke3A0c06G47kvVWgssu7ur47BN=0goc2ELDhKQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=sbergman27@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).