linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
To: Vishal Verma <vverma@digitalocean.com>
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	rgoldwyn@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] md: raid1 add nowait support
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 12:33:38 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW5vrMcyMHXNyyFUkzdHnWAGs+WUSLwkrrpyt81Bu3ap2g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211215060906.3230-2-vverma@digitalocean.com>

On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:09 PM Vishal Verma <vverma@digitalocean.com> wrote:
>
> This adds nowait support to the RAID1 driver. It makes RAID1 driver
> return with EAGAIN for situations where it could wait for eg:
>
> - Waiting for the barrier,
> - Array got frozen,
> - Too many pending I/Os to be queued.
>
> wait_barrier() fn is modified to return bool to support error for
> wait barriers. It returns true in case of wait or if wait is not
> required and returns false if wait was required but not performed
> to support nowait.

Please see some detailed comments below. But a general and more important
question: were you able to trigger these conditions (path that lead to
bio_wouldblock_error) in the tests?

Ideally, we should test all these conditions. If something is really
hard to trigger,
please highlight that in the commit log, so that I can run more tests on them.

Thanks,
Song

>
> Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vverma@digitalocean.com>
> ---
>  drivers/md/raid1.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> index 7dc8026cf6ee..727d31de5694 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> @@ -929,8 +929,9 @@ static void lower_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr)
>         wake_up(&conf->wait_barrier);
>  }
>
> -static void _wait_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, int idx)
> +static bool _wait_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, int idx, bool nowait)
>  {
> +       bool ret = true;
>         /*
>          * We need to increase conf->nr_pending[idx] very early here,
>          * then raise_barrier() can be blocked when it waits for
> @@ -961,7 +962,7 @@ static void _wait_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, int idx)
>          */
>         if (!READ_ONCE(conf->array_frozen) &&
>             !atomic_read(&conf->barrier[idx]))
> -               return;
> +               return ret;
>
>         /*
>          * After holding conf->resync_lock, conf->nr_pending[idx]
> @@ -979,18 +980,27 @@ static void _wait_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, int idx)
>          */
>         wake_up(&conf->wait_barrier);
>         /* Wait for the barrier in same barrier unit bucket to drop. */
> -       wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_barrier,
> -                           !conf->array_frozen &&
> -                            !atomic_read(&conf->barrier[idx]),
> -                           conf->resync_lock);
> +       if (conf->array_frozen || atomic_read(&conf->barrier[idx])) {

Do we really need this check?

> +               /* Return false when nowait flag is set */
> +               if (nowait)
> +                       ret = false;
> +               else {
> +                       wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_barrier,
> +                                       !conf->array_frozen &&
> +                                       !atomic_read(&conf->barrier[idx]),
> +                                       conf->resync_lock);
> +               }
> +       }
>         atomic_inc(&conf->nr_pending[idx]);

Were you able to trigger the condition in the tests? I think we should
only increase
nr_pending for ret == true. Otherwise, we will leak a nr_pending.

>         atomic_dec(&conf->nr_waiting[idx]);
>         spin_unlock_irq(&conf->resync_lock);
> +       return ret;
>  }
>
> -static void wait_read_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr)
> +static bool wait_read_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr, bool nowait)
>  {
>         int idx = sector_to_idx(sector_nr);
> +       bool ret = true;
>
>         /*
>          * Very similar to _wait_barrier(). The difference is, for read
> @@ -1002,7 +1012,7 @@ static void wait_read_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr)
>         atomic_inc(&conf->nr_pending[idx]);
>
>         if (!READ_ONCE(conf->array_frozen))
> -               return;
> +               return ret;
>
>         spin_lock_irq(&conf->resync_lock);
>         atomic_inc(&conf->nr_waiting[idx]);
> @@ -1013,19 +1023,27 @@ static void wait_read_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr)
>          */
>         wake_up(&conf->wait_barrier);
>         /* Wait for array to be unfrozen */
> -       wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_barrier,
> -                           !conf->array_frozen,
> -                           conf->resync_lock);
> +       if (conf->array_frozen || atomic_read(&conf->barrier[idx])) {

I guess we don't need this either. Also, the condition there is not identical
to wait_barrier (no need to check conf->barrier[idx]).

> +               if (nowait)
> +                       /* Return false when nowait flag is set */
> +                       ret = false;
> +               else {
> +                       wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_barrier,
> +                                       !conf->array_frozen,
> +                                       conf->resync_lock);
> +               }
> +       }
>         atomic_inc(&conf->nr_pending[idx]);

ditto on nr_pending.

>         atomic_dec(&conf->nr_waiting[idx]);
>         spin_unlock_irq(&conf->resync_lock);
> +       return ret;
>  }
>
> -static void wait_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr)
> +static bool wait_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr, bool nowait)
>  {
>         int idx = sector_to_idx(sector_nr);
>
> -       _wait_barrier(conf, idx);
> +       return _wait_barrier(conf, idx, nowait);
>  }
>
>  static void _allow_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, int idx)
> @@ -1236,7 +1254,11 @@ static void raid1_read_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
>          * Still need barrier for READ in case that whole
>          * array is frozen.
>          */
> -       wait_read_barrier(conf, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
> +       if (!wait_read_barrier(conf, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector,
> +                               bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT)) {
> +               bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
> +               return;
> +       }
>
>         if (!r1_bio)
>                 r1_bio = alloc_r1bio(mddev, bio);
> @@ -1336,6 +1358,10 @@ static void raid1_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
>                      bio->bi_iter.bi_sector, bio_end_sector(bio))) {
>
>                 DEFINE_WAIT(w);
> +               if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) {
> +                       bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
> +                       return;
> +               }
>                 for (;;) {
>                         prepare_to_wait(&conf->wait_barrier,
>                                         &w, TASK_IDLE);
> @@ -1353,17 +1379,26 @@ static void raid1_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
>          * thread has put up a bar for new requests.
>          * Continue immediately if no resync is active currently.
>          */
> -       wait_barrier(conf, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
> +       if (!wait_barrier(conf, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector,
> +                               bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT)) {
> +               bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
> +               return;
> +       }
>
>         r1_bio = alloc_r1bio(mddev, bio);
>         r1_bio->sectors = max_write_sectors;
>
>         if (conf->pending_count >= max_queued_requests) {
>                 md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
> +               if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) {
> +                       bio_wouldblock_error(bio);

I think we need to fix conf->nr_pending before returning.

> +                       return;
> +               }
>                 raid1_log(mddev, "wait queued");
>                 wait_event(conf->wait_barrier,
>                            conf->pending_count < max_queued_requests);
>         }
> +
>         /* first select target devices under rcu_lock and
>          * inc refcount on their rdev.  Record them by setting
>          * bios[x] to bio
> @@ -1458,9 +1493,14 @@ static void raid1_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
>                                 rdev_dec_pending(conf->mirrors[j].rdev, mddev);
>                 r1_bio->state = 0;
>                 allow_barrier(conf, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
> +
> +               if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) {
> +                       bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
> +                       return;
> +               }
>                 raid1_log(mddev, "wait rdev %d blocked", blocked_rdev->raid_disk);
>                 md_wait_for_blocked_rdev(blocked_rdev, mddev);
> -               wait_barrier(conf, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
> +               wait_barrier(conf, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector, false);
>                 goto retry_write;
>         }
>
> @@ -1687,7 +1727,7 @@ static void close_sync(struct r1conf *conf)
>         int idx;
>
>         for (idx = 0; idx < BARRIER_BUCKETS_NR; idx++) {
> -               _wait_barrier(conf, idx);
> +               _wait_barrier(conf, idx, false);
>                 _allow_barrier(conf, idx);
>         }
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-15 20:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-01 21:51 [PATCH] md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT Vishal Verma
2021-11-02  3:41 ` Li Feng
2021-11-02  5:01 ` Song Liu
2021-11-02 14:40   ` [PATCH v2] " Vishal Verma
2021-11-02 15:31     ` Jens Axboe
2021-11-02 18:35     ` Song Liu
2021-11-04  4:51       ` [PATCH v3 2/2] md: raid1 add nowait support Vishal Verma
2021-11-04  4:51         ` [PATCH v3 1/2] md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT Vishal Verma
2021-11-06 15:38           ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-11-07  0:16             ` Vishal Verma
2021-11-08 22:17           ` Song Liu
2021-11-08 22:36             ` Vishal Verma
2021-11-06 15:24         ` [PATCH v3 2/2] md: raid1 add nowait support Guoqing Jiang
2021-11-07  0:18           ` Vishal Verma
2021-11-08 22:32         ` Song Liu
2021-11-08 22:39           ` Vishal Verma
2021-11-09 20:59             ` Vishal Verma
2021-11-10 17:02               ` Song Liu
2021-11-10 17:04                 ` Vishal Verma
2021-11-10 18:14           ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/4] md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT Vishal Verma
2021-11-10 18:14             ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/4] md: raid1 add nowait support Vishal Verma
2021-11-10 18:14             ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/4] md: raid10 " Vishal Verma
2021-12-14  0:32               ` Song Liu
2021-12-14 15:27                 ` Vishal Verma
2021-11-10 18:14             ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/4] md: raid456 " Vishal Verma
2021-11-11 21:42               ` Song Liu
     [not found]                 ` <f8c2a2bc-a885-8254-2b39-fc0c969ac70d@digitalocean.com>
2021-11-19  4:07                   ` Song Liu
2021-11-19  4:20                     ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-09 16:53                     ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-09 16:59                       ` Song Liu
2021-12-09 17:01                         ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-10  2:16               ` Song Liu
2021-12-10  7:18                 ` Song Liu
2021-12-10 18:26                 ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-13  5:56                   ` Song Liu
2021-12-13 22:43                     ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-13 23:35                       ` Jens Axboe
     [not found]                         ` <78d5f029-791e-6d3f-4871-263ec6b5c09b@digitalocean.com>
2021-12-14  1:11                           ` Song Liu
2021-12-14  1:12                             ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-14 15:30                               ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-14 17:08                                 ` Song Liu
2021-12-14 18:09                                   ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-15  6:09                                   ` [PATCH v5 1/4] md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT Vishal Verma
2021-12-15  6:09                                     ` [PATCH v5 2/4] md: raid1 add nowait support Vishal Verma
2021-12-15 20:33                                       ` Song Liu [this message]
2021-12-15 22:20                                         ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-21 20:06                                           ` [PATCH v6 1/4] md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT Vishal Verma
2021-12-21 20:06                                             ` [PATCH v6 2/4] md: raid1 add nowait support Vishal Verma
2021-12-21 20:06                                             ` [PATCH v6 3/4] md: raid10 " Vishal Verma
2021-12-22 23:58                                               ` Song Liu
2021-12-23  1:47                                               ` Song Liu
2021-12-21 20:06                                             ` [PATCH v6 4/4] md: raid456 " Vishal Verma
2021-12-21 22:02                                               ` John Stoffel
2021-12-25  2:14                                               ` Song Liu
     [not found]                                                 ` <aadc6d52-bc6e-527a-3b9c-0be225f9b727@digitalocean.com>
2021-12-25 22:13                                                   ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-26  0:07                                                     ` Song Liu
2021-12-26  4:02                                                       ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-26 21:20                                                         ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-22 16:06                                             ` [PATCH v6 1/4] md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT Jens Axboe
2021-12-23  1:22                                             ` Song Liu
2021-12-23  2:57                                             ` Song Liu
2021-12-23  3:08                                               ` Vishal Verma
2022-01-02  0:11                                               ` Song Liu
2022-01-02  2:08                                                 ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-23  8:36                                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-15  6:09                                     ` [PATCH v5 3/4] md: raid10 add nowait support Vishal Verma
2021-12-15 20:42                                       ` Song Liu
2021-12-15 22:20                                         ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-16  0:30                                           ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-16 16:40                                             ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-16 16:42                                             ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-16 16:45                                               ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-16 18:49                                                 ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-16 19:40                                                   ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-16 20:18                                                     ` Song Liu
2021-12-16 20:37                                                       ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-16 23:50                                                         ` Song Liu
     [not found]                                                           ` <bd90d6e6-adb4-2696-3110-fad0b1ee00dc@digitalocean.com>
2021-12-21  8:13                                                             ` Song Liu
2021-12-21 15:29                                                               ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-21 15:59                                                                 ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-21 16:26                                                                   ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-16 18:14                                               ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-15  6:09                                     ` [PATCH v5 4/4] md: raid456 " Vishal Verma
2021-12-15 20:02                                     ` [PATCH v5 1/4] md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT Song Liu
2021-12-14  0:36                       ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/4] md: raid456 add nowait support Song Liu
2021-12-13 23:50             ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/4] md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT Song Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPhsuW5vrMcyMHXNyyFUkzdHnWAGs+WUSLwkrrpyt81Bu3ap2g@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
    --cc=vverma@digitalocean.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).