From: Sebastian Kuzminsky <seb@highlab.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid sync observations
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 14:33:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1Eop7O-00005k-JG@highlab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17320.30528.417691.57401@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> You can get better speed on creation with
> mdadm -C -l6 -n4 -x2 /dev/sd[ab] missing missing /dev/sd[cd]
>
> i.e. create with 2 missing devices and 2 spares. Recovery onto the
> spares will do purely sequential IO on all devices and so will go
> much faster.
> Doing this requires regenerating datablocks which is more cpu
> intensive that generating P and Q, so there might be some CPU
> overhead, but the disk throughput is still much faster.
>
> In 2.6.16, raid6 resync has been improved somewhat. This will not
> affect the initial sync, but resync after a crash will only write
> P/Q blocks which are wrong and there are usually very few of those.
> This means that it will mostly to sequential reads on all drives, so
> you get full device speed.
Thanks!!
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-20 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-20 17:18 Raid sync observations Sebastian Kuzminsky
2005-12-20 18:14 ` Sebastian Kuzminsky
2005-12-20 21:27 ` Neil Brown
2005-12-20 21:33 ` Sebastian Kuzminsky [this message]
2005-12-21 1:55 ` Christopher Smith
2005-12-21 11:49 ` Andy Smith
2005-12-21 17:02 ` Sebastian Kuzminsky
2005-12-21 17:13 ` Gordon Henderson
2006-01-08 18:18 ` Bill Davidsen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-12-20 18:27 Andrew Burgess
2005-12-20 19:13 ` Sebastian Kuzminsky
2005-12-20 22:09 Jeff Breidenbach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1Eop7O-00005k-JG@highlab.com \
--to=seb@highlab.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).