From: "Jansen, Frank" <fjansen@CROSSBEAMSYS.COM>
To: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Latency issues with MD-RAID
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 21:13:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <FE279AF0CA06284B8C26150408F3EB12078DB4AA@CBSSEXM02P.crossbeamsys.com> (raw)
We're doing some testing to determine performance of MD-RAID and suitability for our environment.
One particular test is giving some cause for concern:
- Run heavy I/O to a raw partition:
# time dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/md0p1 bs=131072 count=1000000
- Run single sync I/Os to the partition:
# time dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/md0p1 bs=4096 count=1 oflag=sync
When we run this, latency for the single I/O completion can go as high as 5-10 seconds
In investigating this, it looks like the following code in md_write_start causes most of the slow down:
if (mddev->in_sync) {
spin_lock_irq(&mddev->write_lock);
if (mddev->in_sync) {
mddev->in_sync = 0;
set_bit(MD_CHANGE_CLEAN, &mddev->flags);
set_bit(MD_CHANGE_PENDING, &mddev->flags);
md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
did_change = 1;
}
spin_unlock_irq(&mddev->write_lock);
}
When we change this to run about once every 10 seconds, our latency goes way down to a reasonable number of milliseconds.
Questions:
- is the high latency for single sync I/Os something that we should expect?
- the first time the thread runs, it was seen to take a lot longer. Is this due to more outstanding metadata or similar?
- is the approach to run the thread less frequently reasonable, or does that open up huge problems?
Thanks,
Frank
next reply other threads:[~2011-03-01 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-01 21:13 Jansen, Frank [this message]
2011-03-01 22:04 ` Latency issues with MD-RAID NeilBrown
2011-03-02 19:17 ` Jansen, Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=FE279AF0CA06284B8C26150408F3EB12078DB4AA@CBSSEXM02P.crossbeamsys.com \
--to=fjansen@crossbeamsys.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox