linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Ryan Earl" <ryan@dynaconnections.com>
To: "J. Ryan Earl" <ryan@dynaconnections.com>,
	Janusz Zamecki <janusz@pipi.ma.cx>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: RAID1 & 2.6.9 performance problem
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:34:54 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <OMEKLMBKKEOEENCKLEIDGEFGCAAA.ryan@dynaconnections.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OMEKLMBKKEOEENCKLEIDAEFGCAAA.ryan@dynaconnections.com>

"You will get 2 parallel sequential reads at around 120MB/sec
assuming you're not bus limited."

To clarify because this looks ambiguous to me now, you should be able to
perform 2 parallel sequential reads both at 60MB/sec = 120MB/sec total.

-ryan


  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-18 17:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-17 15:22 RAID1 & 2.6.9 performance problem Janusz Zamecki
2005-01-17 15:39 ` Gordon Henderson
2005-01-17 15:51   ` Hans Kristian Rosbach
2005-01-17 16:46     ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-18 13:18       ` Hans Kristian Rosbach
2005-01-18 13:43         ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-17 20:49     ` Janusz Zamecki
2005-01-17 16:24   ` Andrew Walrond
2005-01-17 16:51     ` Is this hdparm -t output correct? (was Re: RAID1 & 2.6.9 performance problem) Andy Smith
2005-01-17 17:04       ` Andrew Walrond
2005-01-17 18:26         ` RAID1 Corruption Markus Gehring
2005-01-17 19:14           ` Paul Clements
2005-01-17 19:35             ` Tony Mantler
2005-01-17 19:42             ` Markus Gehring
2005-01-17 19:21           ` Sven Anders
2005-01-18 17:32 ` RAID1 & 2.6.9 performance problem J. Ryan Earl
2005-01-18 17:34   ` J. Ryan Earl [this message]
2005-01-18 18:41     ` Janusz Zamecki
2005-01-18 19:18       ` J. Ryan Earl
2005-01-18 19:34         ` Janusz Zamecki
2005-01-18 19:12   ` Janusz Zamecki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=OMEKLMBKKEOEENCKLEIDGEFGCAAA.ryan@dynaconnections.com \
    --to=ryan@dynaconnections.com \
    --cc=janusz@pipi.ma.cx \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).