From: "J. Ryan Earl" <ryan@dynaconnections.com>
To: Janusz Zamecki <janusz@pipi.ma.cx>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: RAID1 & 2.6.9 performance problem
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:18:47 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <OMEKLMBKKEOEENCKLEIDOEFICAAA.ryan@dynaconnections.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1106073663.14134.249.camel@pipi.ma.cx>
I missed that, sounds like you got an IDE concurrency problem. Perhaps you
can't read from both ports for some reason. Don't think it's a raid problem
though.
-ryan
-----Original Message-----
From: Janusz Zamecki [mailto:janusz@pipi.ma.cx]
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 12:41 PM
To: J. Ryan Earl
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: RAID1 & 2.6.9 performance problem
W liście z wto, 18-01-2005, godz. 18:34, J. Ryan Earl pisze:
> "You will get 2 parallel sequential reads at around 120MB/sec
> assuming you're not bus limited."
>
> To clarify because this looks ambiguous to me now, you should be able to
> perform 2 parallel sequential reads both at 60MB/sec = 120MB/sec total.
>
> -ryan
>
Hi,
Unfortunatelly it is not the case. Please go to my original e-mail. I've
ran two simultaneous tests and I get:
hdparm -t /dev/md6 &
hdparm -t /dev/md6
This is the result:
--disk/hdg----disk/hde-
_read write _read write
0 0 : 0 0
0 0 : 0 0
124k 0 :26.0M 0
368k 0 :45.5M 0
0 0 : 0 0
0 0 : 896k 0
124k 0 :1568k 0
0 0 : 0 0
One disk works with 75% of its full speed, the second one works with
0,6% of its full speed or even less.
Best regards, Janusz
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-18 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-17 15:22 RAID1 & 2.6.9 performance problem Janusz Zamecki
2005-01-17 15:39 ` Gordon Henderson
2005-01-17 15:51 ` Hans Kristian Rosbach
2005-01-17 16:46 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-18 13:18 ` Hans Kristian Rosbach
2005-01-18 13:43 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-17 20:49 ` Janusz Zamecki
2005-01-17 16:24 ` Andrew Walrond
2005-01-17 16:51 ` Is this hdparm -t output correct? (was Re: RAID1 & 2.6.9 performance problem) Andy Smith
2005-01-17 17:04 ` Andrew Walrond
2005-01-17 18:26 ` RAID1 Corruption Markus Gehring
2005-01-17 19:14 ` Paul Clements
2005-01-17 19:35 ` Tony Mantler
2005-01-17 19:42 ` Markus Gehring
2005-01-17 19:21 ` Sven Anders
2005-01-18 17:32 ` RAID1 & 2.6.9 performance problem J. Ryan Earl
2005-01-18 17:34 ` J. Ryan Earl
2005-01-18 18:41 ` Janusz Zamecki
2005-01-18 19:18 ` J. Ryan Earl [this message]
2005-01-18 19:34 ` Janusz Zamecki
2005-01-18 19:12 ` Janusz Zamecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=OMEKLMBKKEOEENCKLEIDOEFICAAA.ryan@dynaconnections.com \
--to=ryan@dynaconnections.com \
--cc=janusz@pipi.ma.cx \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).