From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Derek Vadala Subject: Re: raid 5 question Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 14:08:25 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: References: <20020430221936.E15847@unthought.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20020430221936.E15847@unthought.net> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jakob_=D8stergaard?= Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, [iso-8859-1] Jakob =D8stergaard wrote: > >I noticed that the raidreconf bundled with the raidtools-1.0 in > > skipjack is 0.1.2 and the one at unthought.net is 0.1.1-- but maybe= that's > > because someone else worked on it and didn't put their name in. >=20 > That is interesting - too bad RedHat didn't care to ask me about the = known > problems with the tool... Some of the known problems are easily fixab= le. There are indeed differences, but they all appear to be trivial. Looks like some stuff was moved from rrc_common.c and into raidreconf.c, specifcally the progress indicator, command line error-checking and use= r confirmation. Everything else appears to be simple compatibility change= s for parts of the raidtools that raidreconf relies on. For example, md-int.h is now md_p.h and md_u.h. I'm about half way through the tests I want to run, so I should have so= me data on how longs are expected to take tomorrow. So far it hasn't been = as slow as I expected. --- Derek Vadala, derek@cynicism.com, http://www.cynicism.com/~derek - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html